JunMcKill

The SU-27SK manual is online in russian and english, very detailed.

I thnk the problem is not to simulate the F-16 in DCS, I think the problem is that DCS could simulate all the other things that BMS has and DCS not, I am talking about dynamic campaigns, radio communications, radio chat between aircraft and ATC etc

Thanks!

I have a question and it's about the modeled SU-27 RWR (Beryoza), I have a Mig-21bis flying straight to me, radar turned on, the SU-27 RWR detects nothing, and the HUD shows the MIG-21 at 50kms away. Why the SU-27 RWR only awakes to the MIG21 radar signal about 32kms away, in the very moment that the MIG-21 pilot receive the echo of my SU-27? In fact EM pulse moves and bound in the other aircraft much before the signal can return to the sender, in the same way of active sonars in submarines.

From Wiki: "R-27R and ER variants can be used in any meteorological conditions. Launch can made at less than 5 g overload and less 50 deg/s roll rate.It is allowed to redesignate targets during flight, or sharing target illumination with other aircraft. R-27T and ET variants can be used out of cloudiness, at least 15 degrees away from the bearing of sun, and 4 degrees away from the bearing of moon and ground based head-contrasting conditions. In cases of maximum head-on range launches where lock-command cannot be utilised, missile can be fired in PPS: In this mode, missile will fly straight until achieves target lock. As missile lacks capability of maneuvering before lock, aircraft itself must maneuver so that missile will be pointed to no more than 15 degrees bearing of the target for confident capture by the IR seeker after launch. Equalising altitude is recommended but not required. On combat operations section of the Su-27 manual, this mode of usage is especially recommended for head-on usage for passive attacks at targets with 0 degrees approach angle (i.e. another fighter moving to intercept), leaving target unalerted to incoming missile. Launch can be made at 0 to 7 g, but limited to 6 g if roll induced slip is more than 2x diameter of the ball." I've tried to launch the R-27ET on this conditions with a friend flying straight to me, and the ET never lock him and flew dumb all the time!. Passing close to his canopy

Then can you answer me, WHY the R-27ET have the range he have? if it's not possible to lock with IR an enemy aircraft less than 25km away?. Why I design a missile with a long range capability if in the real I can't use it !? You have no answer for that logical question, by the way I asked my request of the missile to IASGATG, not to you or anyone of ED, that never listen to others! There is a lot of people, including real pilots of the cuban and venezuelan airforce and technicians, dissapointed with the simulation of the russian missiles by ED. http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-Rus-BVR-AAM.html#mozTocId611424 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlo_Kopp

Who told you that? all the sources I know, including cuban MIG-29 pilots say it's real, the R-27ET is launched using radar and radio guidance. And all the info published on internet about the information I postwd, is wrong? why the ED simulation of the R-27ER never goes pitbull and activate the doppler radar in the final stage? how ED can probe us (the clients!!!) they are giving us the most realistic missile simulation? and not the comercial one, trying to keep an even level with the AIM-120C and F-15 pilots?. I don't think Russian airforce is enough stupid to be flying everyday all their fighters with those dumbs missiles! (if you watch every picture in the avitionist online page, they are always flying with R-27ER and R-27ET in their wings!)

Hi Flanker, I was looking the tacview file (the original on my PC, and the one posted offcial) and I have the situation that Ironmike AIM-120Cs exploded at 2.5km from my aircraft and I was destroyed, I replay my own track (with no lag) with exernal views and labels, and happened the same, both misiles exploded at 2 km from me and I was destroyed. I know DCS have lot of issues with the MP communication yet, but in this case is not fair, my aircraft was not lagging in any of the tracks and tacs I have seen so far. I recall that I perfectly saw the smoke trail of both missiles from the very beginning, and began evasing maneuvers, but anyway they destroyed me very far from the real point of activation! Regards, RuSh PS: If you need, if I can upload my track and my own tacview, anyway both have the same thing than yours.

Hi Flankenator, Maverick and Frostie I have an idea to be considered by you, as you know we like to fly DCS closer to reality as possible, not only in terms of simulation, but the area of operations as in real life, so I propose that in the next Joint warrior put 14 vs 14, the game will only have 13 aircraft vs 13, but the individual will be as ground controller, this person can not move land units (you can edit that in mission editor) and will be like GCI and chief operating officer with the FOG OF WAR only, in the air for each side will allow an AWACS and one EW radar for backup in case you destroy the AWACS. I think the idea is good, and the server will only have 13 vs 13 fighters. regards, RuSh

Users with Joystick logitech G940 have the JOY_BTN3 auto assigned by the mod in the SU-27 options to "Stick to trimmer control mode", and in the others FC3 aircrafts is deleted, you have to manually assign again to View Center o whatever you use it.

Yeah, 104th as usual, show a masterful command of the air, both in strategy and tactical combat. Congratulations to both squads! and all pilots! RuSh

Thanks! RuSH

Hi Maverick and Flanker, it's possible you can activate the 104th server in the morning with the official server version (1.2.10) in order to check if all our pilots have the proper IC files to get into the server? Thanks, RuSh

Hi Flanker, if it is possible leave two SU-33 available for the green coalition: =EV57= Iberian will take a SU-33 and =71st= Truco in a SU-27 but is not decided yet, thats why I prefer two SU-33 available tomorrow in Anapa Thanks! RuSh

Users with Joystick logitech G940 have the JOY_BTN3 auto assigned by the mod in the SU-27 options to "Stick to trimmer control mode", and in the others FC3 aircrafts is deleted, you have to manually assign again to View Center o whatever you use it.

Yeah Mav, I told the same to the green coalition!. Thanks! RuSh

ASAP PLEASE!!!

Hi Flankenator, I edited our roster, changed some official pilots, reserve and aircrafts. Sorry for the inconvenience. Thanks! RuSh Coalition EDP =71st=, ECV56 Condor and EV57 pilots (MODIFIED): Callsign: <CLE> =71st= AlemaN Nationality: Argentina Aircraft: SU-27 Callsign: <CLE> =71st= Honos Nationality: Spain Aircraft: SU-27 Callsign: =71st= Truco Nationality: Argentina Aircraft: SU-33 Callsign: <CLE> Pajaron IV Nationality: Argentina Aircraft: SU-27 Callsign: <CLE> =ECV56= Skyhell Nationality: Argentina Aircraft: F-15C Callsign: <CLE> =71st= Jackal Nationality: Argentina Aircraft: SU-27 Callsign: <CLE> =71st= Rush Nationality: Cuba-Mexico Aircraft: MIG-29S Callsign: =EV57= Iberian Nationality: Cuba-USA Aircraft: MIG-29S Callsign: =EV57= Tunther Nationality: Cuba-USA Aircraft: MIG-29S Callsign: =EV57= Ninja Nationality: Colombia Aircraft: F-15C Callsign: =EV57= Hogan77 Nationality: Colombia Aircraft: F-15C Callsign: <CLE> =71st= FoxOne Nationality: Argentina Aircraft: SU-25T Callsign: <CLE> =71st= Cefalea Nationality: Mexico Aircraft:SU-25T Reserve: Callsign: <CLE> =CDA= Unisold Nationality: Spain Aircraft: F-15C Callsign: =EV57= Maniac Nationality: Republica Dominicana Aircraft: F-15C Callsign: =EV57= Madman Nationality: Colombia Aircraft: F-15C Callsign: <CLE> =71st= Flecha Nationality: Argentina Aircraft: SU-27 Callsign: <CLE> =ECV56= Krypto Nationality: Argentina Aircraft: SU-27 Callsign: <CLE> =71st= Manu Nationality: Spain Aircraft: SU-27

Hi Flanker, I noticed that Sukhumi and Sochi airports have no weapons, and do not have a refill schedule (left the mission for hours and nothing), it means that is mandatory to replenish ammo in Batumi/Maykop? Thanks! RuSh

Thanks then we are red! RuSh

Thanks Flanker, when the sides will be selected? some kind of lottery? Regards, RuSh

Coalition EDP =71st=, ECV56 Condor and EV57 pilots (MODIFIED): Callsign: <CLE> =71st= AlemaN Nationality: Argentina Aircraft: SU-27 Callsign: <CLE> =71st= Honos Nationality: Spain Aircraft: SU-27 Callsign: =71st= Truco Nationality: Argentina Aircraft: SU-33 Callsign: <CLE> Pajaron IV Nationality: Argentina Aircraft: SU-27 Callsign: <CLE> =ECV56= Skyhell Nationality: Argentina Aircraft: F-15C Callsign: <CLE> =71st= Jackal Nationality: Argentina Aircraft: SU-27 Callsign: <CLE> =71st= Rush Nationality: Cuba-Mexico Aircraft: MIG-29S Callsign: =EV57= Iberian Nationality: Cuba-USA Aircraft: MIG-29S Callsign: =EV57= Tunther Nationality: Cuba-USA Aircraft: MIG-29S Callsign: =EV57= Ninja Nationality: Colombia Aircraft: F-15C Callsign: =EV57= Hogan77 Nationality: Colombia Aircraft: F-15C Callsign: <CLE> =71st= FoxOne Nationality: Argentina Aircraft: SU-25T Callsign: <CLE> =71st= Cefalea Nationality: Mexico Aircraft:SU-25T Reserve: Callsign: <CLE> =CDA= Unisold Nationality: Spain Aircraft: F-15C Callsign: =EV57= Maniac Nationality: Republica Dominicana Aircraft: F-15C Callsign: =EV57= Madman Nationality: Colombia Aircraft: F-15C Callsign: <CLE> =71st= Flecha Nationality: Argentina Aircraft: SU-27 Callsign: <CLE> =ECV56= Krypto Nationality: Argentina Aircraft: SU-27 Callsign: <CLE> =71st= Manu Nationality: Spain Aircraft: SU-27

Hi Maverick and Flanker, I was making some calculations in the mission, and is visble that red side have advantage, first thing is they are at only 320 km from bullseye and about 272km from sochi, in the blue side from vaziani to bullseye they have 422km! and 352km to sukhumi, are 7 minutes of flight and fuel burn of difference, I think to make things fair you should take the beslan airfield as blue fighters airfield, or give 5 minutes of flight to the blue side, before the red side takeof. In the last JW 2 we were blue against 51st, when we arrived to sukhumi they were already over our airfield!. At the same time, I would like to know what side will take all the teams from the first moment they are defined, in order to make all estrategy based on the operations theater of the selected side. Regards, RuSh

Thanks Mav!

Hi Flanker, i was looking in the mission you posted and there is no Ka-50 or any helo, could you post please the mission with those aircrafts? Thanks! =71st= RuSh