Japo32

For me the video was a not high surprise. Yes, of course I will buy the Mig29A if it comes with enough A/G weapons, even is a plane with low flight time because fuel consumption, but the Mig29A was talked about they were doing it for long time, so no real surprise (of course yes to be finally developed). The IRAQ map is a mehh for me, because even lots of wars has happened there, it is the greatest flat region in the world with lot of desert. When I flought it in MSFS I was sleeping in my cockpit. BUT if it comes with the mountains of IRAN up to TEHERAN, then mmmmm, that would be interestin! So lets see what ED has to say about it. I would preffer it more than going to the south to Kuwait. But would have liked to have more surprises, or at least advanced in modules we are waiting for long time. 1. Vietnam. Yes, it is going to be produced, but if it is not in the video, how long will be when we have it? I know it can be a third party development, but also the video shows 3rd parties. 2. Where is Afganistan? I would like to see it more than Iraq for the Apaches. Again as Point 1. how far is to be complete if not shown in the video (unless the first base shown is Kabul) 3. it has been said, about the dynamic campaign, and yes.. it is true it is already talked previously but we have been waiting looong time, and more will be I think. 4. Other type of clouds? cumulonimbus, other weather hazards? (pleaseeeeee upgrade that ugly fog system!!!) 5. Chinook is great, but I won't buy it unless there is a more strong logistics gameplay. But I belive that only will come with dynamic campaign. 6. The huge great surprise it would be it ED would announce an Abrams full fidellity tank with multicrew. I play Steelbeasts and I think it can be done great in DCS. Or a CA 2.0 Don't get me wrong! it is great to see such additions comming to DCS. Lots of new helicopters, planes and terrains, but for a person like me that has ALL the aircrafts and terrains developed in DCS, I think I need more gameplay comming, than more terrains, or aircrafts, that I will buy of course (if I have the enough money when they are released) and I think, also gameplay sells even more than new modules. Specially for new people (please!! fix the AI flying with you!!) Thanks in any case and happy 2024!

Also people always think about PvP (not saying you do) and they try to fight with F18 etc. I believe it is an 1980 early plane so it should fight with it age planes, so maybe the strong one is the MIG29 then. I think "all planes" PvP is making a bad influence in the development of DCS with people complaining about theirs module weak points against others, and "maybe" ED modifying the core weapons to match equally the PvP fights. You didn't say anything about PvP with the future Mig29A but I have read lot of users complain about the same "how I can fight against a F18, or F15e, or F16?" Saying that, If in Ucrania war, we saw how the NATO put a HARM in a Ucranian Mig29, why not mod the future Mig29A with futuristic weapons, simulating that those A versions in a nowadays conflict? If the A version has enough A/G weapons, I will buy it, because it is the most preatiest plane ever built, I think.

my fear is, how they are going to resolve the performance problem. Right now if you put some ground units fighting each other, fps goes down a lot. That has been a huge problem for long time in DCS multiplayer missions. Hope they find the clue to solve those situations without any performance issues.

Hello! With the new FCS the way to make IFF is with the Link mode in future, but for now we have to go to gunner seat, Store the scaned icon on FCR or TSD, store it, and slave to the TADS to see it. Would it be possible to add a function in George menu to Slave the TADS to the selected T01, T02.... T0x that is selected please? That way we as pilots can create the target points and tell George to aim for them, even having laser missiles. Thanks!

ok! and I suppose the sentence is the same Unit.getByName('name') ?

Hello! I am learning LUA for DCS and I know that I can have the position of a unit called "myUnit" in ME like this: local unitLoc = Unit.getByName('myUnit'):getPoint() But if I don't have the name of that object, for example a House in the map. I only have the object ID. (For example 82505001) is there a way of having the "getPoint" or position of that house with its ID number? I suppose I have to use an StaticObject, but don't know what to use, because getID and getObjectID just returns the number of an named object I suppose. I am totally new with this. Thanks!

well.. it is already kamikaze specially when landings XDD but would be nice to add that one.

No, I don't want that. I want the user to be able to do it for himself, not forced by server or whatever. Client side only, and all internet radios would be seen via a txt file or config.

+1 Mbucchia's solution is working great, but it has issues with night raids with reflectors lights over WW2 missions, plus others in winter. This is the only solution that made my fps go higher and even see everything better than by default. But if ED don't give official support, that wonder can be lost in future updates of DCS.

Hello! I would like to have the option to link the internet radios into DCS location. The problem is right now only can be done recording a radio in WAV or OGG, looping the audio and using the radio transmition option. I would like to not be recording anything so I could just put an http radio online as Radio Batumi: 45.9.46.110:1515/batumifm and use it lo make a template for my missions or just a server with all mapped location radios, that appart of giving better ambience, they could do well for Homing FM and interferences if I simulate the transmision harmonic frequencies, https://www.rfwireless-world.com/calculators/RF-Harmonics-Calculator.html Thanks.

I would like also to be able to activate the power switches on the right wall of both radios. I can see them clearly well and they don't move if I put the mouse over them, or just click my joystick assignation. For those of us that fly the plane alone, even in VR is better to look back to the right than sit down in the 2 navigator position and look to the left (at least in my case). So it would be great if we could manage everything from the Pilot position, and of course preserve what is already with the navigator. Also from the navigator seat, is not possible to modify the propeller RPMs.

I would like to change to Voice but the poeple that I fly with, don't like to. Specially when someone still don't hear others, and all the walkarounds are done with same problem. I think the modulation fx, the distance noise and some other features are better in voice, but as said, many people won't change because if SRS do the job, why change? In my case I would like also because less programs running at the same time, and SRS still sometimes gives problems with human copilot. If ED or SRS would make an option to use both at the same time it would be great.

Is the band select of the ARN6 broken? It doesn't change to any band of frequencies. just stays in the 410-850

Subido el video del Ka50 Vademecum tutorial total.. y su piernógrafo. También he querido dejar una clase particular que le di a un colega sobre el F15. el piernógrafo Vademecum también está.

You are right! Thanks!

Añadido el Mirage F1 como piernógrafo. No como video. Para ponerlos recordar hacer en Kneeboard de juegos salvados 3 directorios como: Mirage-F1CE, Mirage-F1BE y Mirage-F1EE y dentro el piernógrafo

Pues el F18 y el Apache por la jugabilidad que me daría en single y multi. No por que los otros no sean tan buenos o incluso mejores.

if safety pin is Gun Firing Trigger UNFOLDED then yes. If it is the parachute pilot jettison, I just tried with plane in flight start so I suppose it was removed.

I cannot make it fire (The gun) without "simplified firing safety logic" 1.MasterARM on 2. Gun Firing Trigger UNFOLDED 3. Select A/A Gun in weapons or just C+M or SW Rbutton 4. Fire with trigger.. don't do anything. With Simplified no problem.

Ok.. found the problem. the inclusion of this line (ULTRA) in the shadows parameter of the optionsDb.lua makes this problem. I suppose I cannot choose ULTRA shadows then. It would be nice that ED would give us that option for the ones that would like to have it. Thanks. graphics('shadows') :setValue(2) :combo({Name(_('OFF')) :Value(0), Name(_('FLAT ONLY')):Value(1), Name(_('LOW')) :Value(2), Name(_('MEDIUM')) :Value(3), Name(_('HIGH')) :Value(4), Name(_('ULTRA')) :Value(5)

I realized that there is this area where I think is better to write in. When Choosing the new Improved Spotting dots I cannot se anything as related by the other post (sorry to post twice)

There is no option. I have spanish language: null

Hello! Last update, don't know if it was previously, but on ground cold and dark the wings vibrate a lot. Specially in South Atlantic cold and dark EE version instant action. Don't know if that is normal or not.

Appart from the rude reply. Also waiting for voice activation of the mic in the hot-mic aircrafts. If the function is available in the real aircrafts I think it would be nice to have it in DCS specially for those people that don't own joysticks with lots of buttons to map (by the way, would it be nice if all voip and ptt menu show would be joined in a single button)

Here in my group still we have issues of people talking and not be heared. They have set the devices as they should, assigned the voip controls in each aircraft, and set the voip volume more than 0%, and press the antenna icon to be green. But nothing. Specially people with the F16. A shame as we would like to change from SRS, no because SRS is a bad program, that is not. It is great! but we wish to use less parallel programs running with DCS