pepin1234

That was not the point of my post. Parts including head seekers was made in Ukraine. Mostly for export clients users of R-27. That means information about variants is well known. and the modern new fighter means, R-27 for RuAf have nothing to do with what was made in Ukraine as it was a modular missile. So of course we still get a Soviet MiG-29 version but with the possibility to carry export R-27 family, unfortunately export stopped after 2014. But they were shown for real to the general public for sale to MiG, Su fighter family users R-27P/R/T with the respective extended versions. Not anymore in the web site. We have been discussing about that a lot in this forum in old threads. https://en.topwar.ru/185470-ukraina-zakljuchila-krupnyj-kontrakt-na-postavku-aviacionnyh-raket-r-27-vozduh-vozduh-srednej-dalnosti.html This news, even when is not 100% clear. Give you a picture of the situation for export R-27 after 2014. Mostly because was a Soviet design, still in use by new RuAf modern Fighters, for sure not with export components (Ukrainian made)

@draconus highlighted for you. Maybe you missed the Ukrainian MiG-29 part and also I added the new fighters because in case you don’t know, Some parts of R-27 was made in Ukraine, but not for service Russian client… still a remarkable detail…

R-27P on a supposed MiG-29 of Ukraine. The wing logo was censored but still the yellow and blue can be seen. New Russian fighters still using the Soviet design R-27 in late war action. Probably with new sensors made in Russia, after removing the Ukraine made parts. That particular missiles seem to be censored in the HUD.

The AWACS in DCS keep telling all maneuvers and positions with accuracy in ECM scenery such is a joke for kids… NS430 doesn’t hurt anybody after look well on DCS

we can turn off the SR radar in your TOR while keeping the TR radar ON and tracking? that is all about my question is. it's not unrealistic at all. I didn't understand what you agree with @Abburo Buk launcher doesn't need a search radar, but instead have a limited SR/TR radar that will track everything go in front of him. Not sure is HAWK TR can operate with TR ones SR radar is destroyed. BUK do it and work perfect for ambushes. Also to set as single units in Frontline its a deadly tactic used in the current war. @Abburo doesn't have a clue what I'm talking about. unfortunately, This forum in plenty of them.

Let me explain better… it’s not about turn on the SAM at the very last moment to ambush. It’s is turn ON the TRK radar only because if the unit received azimuth from EWR, then there isn’t need to turn SR radar ON but only the TRK to do the lock on and fire. SR radar ON means you have 360 degrees on enemy detection sensors, while TRK radar ON only means about 15-30 degrees of radar beam and so will avoid the easy destruction by ARM missiles from Air enemy units. ED knows very well that and is keeping it unreal for easy SEAD missions. Totally unreal.

@currenthill we really need increase the simulation for Air defense sistema. Units like TOR, Tunguska, Roland have all radars together in DCS and that is not the way it work in real life. The only tactical system that work TRK and SR units independent is the BUK. Can you please do something to separate the TRK and SR radar and make a key combination for them separately. We already have triggers that turn off and ON radars and that way probably you can figure it out how to do that job. TOR and Pantsir are SR radar ON all the time and that is not the way always goes IRL.

I would like know more about that in real action war. An inspection after landing is a must. Probably in real emergency situation you can skip that.

I want to know if FF Mig-29 will rearm and refuel with engine on like FF F-16,18,15 do right now in MP? This is a Full Fidelity feature though… as FC3 aircraft’s must engine off before rearm and refuel…

Can I custom change the DCS wallpaper to one of those Fulcrum wallpapers?

New Swift Acrobatic group Paint Scheme (vertical stabilizer is different scheme now): https://t.me/rostmeo/4075

Your statement need to be approved by the UN I guess. Things doesn’t work like that or should not.

Please Do you have the photo to share?

Well if an official website is not a proof then what is for you? Your negation to have the missile in DCS maybe is a proof of fear to not be shoot down by something different that what you know until now.

The R-27P was recently in the Tactical Missiles Corporation web site. It’s an official site from Russian defense. They removed from the web site after the Ukraine war started. It’s Is a fact that missile exist and the removed action for export after war started is a proof that missile is a lethal weapon and probably they decided to stop offering to export. https://ktrv.ru/production/voennaya_produktsiya/upravlyaemoe_aviatsionnoe_vooruzhenie/rakety_klassa_-vozdukh-vozdukh/

Yeah Mig-23BN or MiG-27 will be a must have for every Redfor pilot

How many aircrafts were built?

Do you need a ECM pod to have light.

Ka-52 mod have it. Probably only fit to Helicopters mod.

This video is a good footage. 15 degrees pitch. 800kph speed and distance seem to be 5km. Interesting -1505117794613741569.mp4

Make sense. So what is your fire setup to hit a narrow area using OFP2? So far, I do well only with KOM.

The loft bombing with S-8 work pretty well in DCS only with S-8KOM. The rest of the rockets have not same flight model, and they are barely or not at all accurate. I’m talking about the ballistic trajectory. It’s extremely different in comparison with the other similar variant S-8OFP. Please give it a try