Jump to content

pepin1234

Members
  • Posts

    3767
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Everything posted by pepin1234

  1. pepin1234

    Hotfix

    Thanks. Good job!
  2. Hoho when we talk about ECM suddenly is WIP, the rest that affect F-15 is to have fun and turn around. Wait and keep looking to the West and to the East forever cuz BS should be fix it.
  3. WIP? like the wings of your F-15 that never get broken with fuel tanks in G’s maneuvers?
  4. My bad. Mig-23BN. It is a really interesting ground attack version. The laser targeting sensor make bombing more accurate. Also have an extra pylon and we still can do some air combat with R-3S and R-13 missiles. I hope they put this version in roadmap for future. Will be very convenient have afterburner in CAS mission. http://www.airwar.ru/enc/fighter/mig23bn.html
  5. Look the picture, circle is the target, but also there is a small mark. Maybe radar position?. I am talking about the radar angle position on Hud representation. Also for similar, look our Su-27 in lock mode. https://images.app.goo.gl/uQt6eDavABCDnQrP9
  6. The radar sweep position on lock target will be represented somehow in Hud? e.g like our Su-27 do?
  7. With all the Physics and instruments, 3D models they are closer to Mig-27.
  8. :thumbup: Ones we know bearing or at least spot the Aim-7 launch it is possible, even Mig-21bis vs F-15 can do it.
  9. That’s also true. I agree with you. I just didn’t want go beyond the Tech issue because then I need to jump in personal issues. About Cubans in Angola. SAAF wanted to do the same ambushes to the Cubans. Worked well the first two. After those Cubans never bite again. Also after that Cubans did respond to SAAF with their own ambushes just did it different.
  10. Because it is MLA/MLD yes, we find good performance there. About the poor success in certain Middle East conflicts. Sometimes they were in tactical and technological disadvantage. Israel with AWACS and F-15 vs the crappy mixed version of Mig-23 from Syria (I guess many people here know the disadvantage between AWACS and GCI). I don’t know if Soviets help Syria with AWACS for those Cold War conflicts. I guess Nop. Iraq-Iran F-14 most of the time was far away from hot areas giving a important kind of tactical AWACS use. Iraq didn’t have this important service. together with all the crappy versions with poor avionic that never help. Soviets export policy help for those poor results.
  11. Some people know that. The problem is the success in DCS with this IRL action war payload mentioned before. If you don’t mind, what is the tactic with DCS range?
  12. nighthawk@ thanks for your respectful chat. I hope someday we get a more comprehensive Russian missiles. I suspect that don’t gonna happen soon.
  13. Just an observation if you want go for the real action of this missile. The R-27R1 (the shorter one) and R-77 in DCS both have about the same range right... When you look in the payload of the Su-35 and Su-30 in Syria what you find is a combination of R-27R1 and R-77. If you follow the supposed real performance of DCS this payload is a no sense, accounting the DCS numbers the semi active radar guided R-27R1 launched in the same range of an active head seeker like R-77 is a no sense and is out of any combat tactic. It is the same A-A payload for J-11, let’s think this export version of both missiles was downgraded in range, still keep as a non sense this payload having the range of DCS for R-27R1 and R-77. The only that can justify this payload is that R-27R1 (the shorter one) IRL have more range and this range by DCS is the same or even slightly less compared with R-77 in our simulator. Something is just not following the real life or basic air combat tactics. If you want to test this, use our J-11 with the R-27R (shorter) with R-77. This both missile range are just unreal in a tactic payload. Just go ahead a whole day in combat with this payload in DCS. You will not find a single tactical reason to set this payload in DCS.
  14. I have a question for Deka. As the HQ-7 SHORAD is a tracking radar only (or kind of radar for distance only), then as mentioned before we will get a Search radar unit separated from the launcher. Can we drive this Search radar unit separate from launcher as Tor and OSA do with the new radar menu? It is a radar guided or Radio Command guided missiles?
  15. I don’t know guys if you have the same issue. After every update I feel very hard to drive the 29 when I perform the dive to the side when got into combat. It is like when you push down and to the side the aircraft don’t want get the path. Two days before I even get in a unexpected roll. I will keep an eye on this...
  16. As I told you before. You don't know the Thrust generate by R-77 rocket. Your imagination can’t be beyond the drag result. Time of the rocket burn and drag generated is not a solid data to tell everybody one missile is better than other. If you want research data sending PM then maybe you want put into this discussion someone else to look for support in your defense to proof something tricky. Maybe you enjoy this low performance Russian missiles not because you look for real data but because you fight against R-77. Do you know the thrust generated by the Russian space rocket in comparison to the competition? Do you know the thrust generated by S-400 missiles or S-300 missiles rockets in comparison with the competition? Do you know the thrust generated by Mig-31 engines? If someone don’t know those thrust data probably don’t know nether the thrust generated by R-77 rocket.
  17. I don’t take simulator as source for real data. I don’t need mention 3rd persons I am talking by myself based in my research. This R-77 from ED have the same range performance of R-24 missile and this is absolutely unacceptable to see this poor performance. I am not telling you must be the same range of Aim-120. Just that range ED simulate for this missile is ridiculous for a BVR missile for a 4gen fighter. Actually the R-77 and R-27R1 are very similar in range, both with 10 years difference in development. The missiles in DCS change in almost every update. Right now we have R-27ER with lower performance than 3 months ago but sometimes we see after another Update get improved back again and so on. It is more like a triggered situation to something else, instead of looking for a 3rd person support for discussion.
  18. You don’t know how powerful is the thrust generated by R-77 rocket. Also the difference with Aim-120 is more than 10km for a maneuver fighter. This difference is compared with R-24 missile which is 2 generation older. This R-77 from ED is extremely low performance in range.
  19. nice! this is the moment we feel this project is in good hands. thanks a lot
  20. Too many rockets used for a single unit. I set only 4 units and two bombers was not enough to kill the 4 units with only rockets because the amount of rocket used by the two bombers in the first entry was too exaggerated. also the ground units was light armors so I don't find the reason why too many rocket spent. mostly in the first inbound. track below: two rocket container.trk
  21. Dart@ Can you make an option to do the automatic alerts by DCS AWACS off while an user is client connected and do this alerts by clicking on the human unit and the human bandit threat with the Lotatc user action. Also the AWACS client should receive every request from MP users by show text in his LotAtc map, then we know which client need the service. Also if you set the AWACS off to no answer, then you can make the answer itself (do it by the clicking action of the user AWACS over the units) in a text message (created by .lua) for the human unit that prev requested only if you get to do that you will get a more friendly multiplayer user for this wonderful app. The goal of this idea is make this app more international friendly using the automatic English message as the pinpoint language for everybody. edit: I forgot mention, with the help of the community you can get the translation of the text message in every popular language, prev set by request in the chat menu.
  22. I have seen very promising mods in Russian community forum. Never finished, very weird. Poor motivation? https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=20901&page=14
  23. the wings span is wider for the drone. About the pod, there is a new one smaller, slight different
  24. pepin1234

    An2

    Did you see this version? It is similar in concept but far different manufacturing and composite materials, new wing design. Cockpit is what I liked most! Very different.
  25. The missiles are smoky. It is a missile launch warning?
×
×
  • Create New...