Jump to content

pepin1234

Members
  • Posts

    3830
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Everything posted by pepin1234

  1. Yeah, Thaad should be there. thanks for the suggestion! @currenthill what about to have a second zipped file as an updater to the mayor huge package. That way we don't need to download the whole package every time you launch some minors add and fix. That way slow speed internet people have a refresh on that. I know some people did stop use your mods due the size of the package to download.
  2. The High digit is a M1-2, previous variant. With old radar. I was just trying to have both Ukraine war versions. Sound to me having only the M3 is too much
  3. You just told I am right. If you see before was officially told that was not possible make a Russian 4th gen because a particular reason…. (Don’t wanna repeat the same crap) then now we get a MiG-29 made by public manual. my question to you: WHAT ARE YOU DOING NOW? Saying again what we all know was not a real reason. Do you really think people gonna believe certain government gonna put in jail the programmer. There are documents and features out there even for new weapons. It’s a leak old Information not secret anymore, nothing that make any difference in the battlefield, because there are newer weapons already. Moreover, there are weapons that were or are banned in this simulator, with the reason: "there is not proof of real use” Example of that is the S-25O. This rocket was not available for very long time. People asked and the answer was there were not proof for the real combat use. After the Ukraine war erupted, They brought the S-25O (by ED with super weak power destruction) to DCS. That was a real proof they are not going to take anything from Russia from manual or documents even when they are for real. It’s a game not a simulator. It’s a manipulation, not an implementation.
  4. ED have something to say about this picture. We were asking for the EP and P (passive for radiation seeker, goes to your radar signal)?? they probably need to see ones captured by Ukrainian. Then they will bring them to DCS. There we go again. But the very funny of this is that many people repeat everywhere that funny invention. With MiG-29 they were telling the same every where and every time.
  5. Not available for certain users in that particular time.
  6. that's totally wrong! Stop tell false information. Before you told only 20 Mig-29S were on Russian Air force and now Mig-29A never use R-27T...!!! every single user of Mig-29A have both missiles variants.
  7. After this amazing news you deserve a monthly support on your donation site. I really appreciate your job!! About the new Buk. M3 is great and welcome, but M2 have been a lot of real action in the current war. If possible, please make M2 in a later addition.
  8. Correct. Just the Aim-120 performance amazingly well in very high altitude such don’t make sense for kinematics. So things should be corrected somehow
  9. Aim-120 doesn’t have that issue at all. Things should be fixed on that regard.
  10. First red 4th gen fighter is welcome! But what about the missiles? R-27R is just useless over sea level below 100m on the current stage. Today two western fighters launched on my face just keeping flight level under 100m. They already know what we got and so tactics goes in DCS, based in what ED gave us. hopefully they give some love to the current missiles before module be launched.
  11. IMG_7960.MOV
  12. Of course there will be extra tunes to that PFM. steering wheel is a no go now, Air brake is not real (do open in every speed rate)
  13. Moreover. IAF have both fighters. Mig-29 have the mayor advantage in dogfight. IAF pilots tell very clear M2000 have no options against Mig-29 in that scenery. In DCS our M2000 overturn Mig-29 in the first merge. So the simulation there is just not close to reality
  14. Keep in mind if we gonna make a multiplayer mission, downloading 10gb only for a single package gonna be a hard task for some people.
  15. Cold War was ended for the general public when Soviet empire fell. For the real military actions the real end of Cold War started before. I don’t want start a debate about that because is off topic. M2000 is out of Cold War real war actions and the version we got in DCS is not suitable to simulate a Cold War. Mig-29A was deployed and ready for real action from 1984. on top of that the FM of our M2000 is just out all logics of physic.
  16. How can I separate a single unit mod from the whole Russian package? I want to share a single unit to a buddy to get installed for a particular mission instead he download the whole package
  17. well, the bags with tail have been shown for us to comment about. We don't know much about those projects, but they are there. Nothing to be excited but to be expecting for more news.
  18. I hope they make it real
  19. I will say Mig-25 was a very impressive fighter iconic of Cold War. ED can make export variants, as well late variants as the ex Soviets republics now NATO kept some of them, based them and they have retired pilots. Of course, for ED priority is western modules first.
  20. M2000 got really in mass production in late 80. The variant we got is more advanced one. It’s out of Cold War era. and our it’s also an UFO in flight model probably beating F-22.
  21. Coming from ED I have doubts about the R-27ER implementation.
  22. Modders are working in make it better and better.
  23. I don’t expect that. Mig-29S is a standard variant for Ukraine Air Force. If MiG-29A have been planed from public manuals. Mig-29S is possible as well. What mean public for ED? Someone shared the technical manual on the internet. Mig-29S and Mig-25 have been in NATO allies, some of them ex Soviets republics. Somewhere should be enough documentation for them.
  24. This thread have no sense since there is a Su-30 mod out there
×
×
  • Create New...