pepin1234

@currenthill did you try give the S-8 rockets size value to the Iskander. If maneuverability can’t not be implemented due anti cheat or core broken maybe using smaller cross section radar from other weapons can make the job.

I don’t wanna start a battle about who is better. Just keep in mind there is not a single radar operation interception proof about nothing against Islander, just Ukr side telling you stories and showing debris

@currenthill can you please restart the mod production on the real life, real action Russian and NATO hardware? Today Iskander Missiles were unbeatable even against Patriots. In your current Iskander mod Patriots eat Iskander like piece of Cake. Not seem to be the same in real Life. Today real action video: also will be nice add a cluster munition version for the Iskander mod. The core Smerch MLRS has Cluster munition version… easy peasy

Hi Folks. I'm out of DCS right now but want to check back how is the current situation for F-15E right now? I really liked what Razbam was doing.

The R-27P head seeker was made originally in Ukraine for export customer only as the Russian domestic version manufactured is located in Russia and they don’t share details. The Ukraine head seeker is orange color as Internet picture show. The Russian version form is unknown as they don’t share details but there is in Internet proof of Russian engineers talking about the production stock of this missile in the Russian inventory. Anyway… at least the Ukrainian version should be in this module. But to be honest don’t expect too much from ED…. when you see there is not Kuznetsov aircraft carrier in a module called supercarrier, that tell the level of expectation you should have from a developer as ED.

Kh-22 has his own flight model? The ED flight model it’s a joke…

The Beast being more beast! Thank you

Su-30SM also with R-37M https://t.me/mod_russia_en/14045

please share your developer discord group

what is happening? can anyone clarify the situation with this module? I was expecting get a Mig-23 Beta close to the F-4 launch but again and again we see certain issues with ED and everything around Russian modules.

Seem you want to compare Mirage F-1 vs MiG-23. They are different configuration and have to do a lot adaptability and practice to get a good level to feel that you can get into a comparison. Probably The learning curve is bigger in Mig, but that doesn’t mean is worst. I believe the only case both face each other in the life of both aircraft was in the Angola vs South Africa air combat encounters. The acceleration of the Mig was stunning in comparison and the maneuverability was good inside that fighter Gen category. Encounters were not many but few of them was enough to get to know Migs were a serious threat. All you can read about trashing the MiG-23 is propaganda and disinformation. There were weak parts on MiGs but it is a matter of mastering your weapon before get the desired results. Same in every other weapons. I will say using SAHR missiles and tactics of that time, MiG-23 were a beast. The Syrian Air Force did not perform well on that bird and Soviets weapons delivery have fault on that too. So is nothing to do in that regard other than proof yourself in a different scenario.

Here we can make a comparison about real cold war avionic and what we get from a Mig-29A early 80s version. Also, we will get a good picture how to adapt the weaponry and systems of current DCS modules to adapt Mig-29A opponents into a cold war scenery.

The R-73 from DDR inventory was a 45 degrees targeting, thrust vectoring on his outlet engine made the rest of the job to get him to turn amazingly 90 degrees very quick.

I love the radar representation on the Hud. I would like to know how they will implement the GCI.

The thread war merged to Chit Chat sub forum. They always do that when someone is asking for something they don’t want to do. So yeah is clear ED will do exactly what you are explaining. Thanks for open a new user to explain all. Enjoy hunting the Mig-29. Have fun with R-27 mocking.

Another quick question. what about F-4, F-5, Mirage F-1 and older 3Th Gen fighters. They also will have the R-27R quick response awareness on RWR? They have MSIP-2 M as well? I think ED should tune up DCS core and put apart what we actually have from FC3 MiG-29A. Things should be clear up in RWR depending what Era and generation fighter will fight MiG-29A. I’m talking about how 3rd Gen fighter will react against R-27R. We already know ED will work in a new R-27R implementation. I hope that includes what opponent RWR see, depending on what RWR see on respective Fighters generation. And that have to do with DCS core.

hopefully after 6 month this feature is close to be ready for the general public Can you please add this feature in DCS core. F-16 take no longer than 4min to rearm that way and they even don't shootdown engines. Fuel tanks doesn't get installed full; they are part of the refueling process.

Make sense.

there are two new threads telling the same issue. It's not a mistake of user logging. Can you confirm is an ED problem?

The point is first the Multistage Improvement Program 1 (MSIP-I), started at 1983 and started to be really operational from 1985. As DCS have not ECM implemented 100%, ECM is not relevant at this point. Not the case for the radar warning receiver. In that case there are some important questions. Is the RWR ALC-56C RWR from MSIP-I capable to detect R-27R SAHR missiles guidance in all stages, as current FC3 F-15C do from the very first moment R-27R leave the rail??? (supposing our F-15C is using the Multistage Improvement Program 2 M, MSIP-II M) Why Soviet Mig-29A should be fighting modernized programs post-cold war? supposed all the information for R-27 taken from ex WARSAW pact countries after 1992 (Now NATO members) was used in further post soviets' improvements of MSIP-II M available after 1993. Its fair keeps a Cold War soviet facing a Post Cold War F-15C with MSIP-II M? In real life they (Soviets) never were close to do so after 1993, but the Serbian and Iragi due the real conflicts. After all that been told, Question is ED is making an Mig-29A to keep the post-cold war Iraq, Serbia conflicts simulation?? or we are allowed to have F-4, F-16A and F-15A/C with the respective MSIP-I from 1985 without detecting every movement of the soviet hardware on the air as we have seen in the current DCS modules?? This is Key to create a fair situational awareness, otherwise we will keep piloting Mig-29A as puppies to bring fun to the post-Cold-War jet Era. F-15 Eagle (globalsecurity.org) F-15 Eagle > Air Force > Fact Sheet Display (af.mil) F-15 Eagle Archives | Air & Space Forces Magazine (airandspaceforces.com)

I hope ED makes a later upgraded version like they did with Ka-50.