pepin1234

Well if an official website is not a proof then what is for you? Your negation to have the missile in DCS maybe is a proof of fear to not be shoot down by something different that what you know until now.

The R-27P was recently in the Tactical Missiles Corporation web site. It’s an official site from Russian defense. They removed from the web site after the Ukraine war started. It’s Is a fact that missile exist and the removed action for export after war started is a proof that missile is a lethal weapon and probably they decided to stop offering to export. https://ktrv.ru/production/voennaya_produktsiya/upravlyaemoe_aviatsionnoe_vooruzhenie/rakety_klassa_-vozdukh-vozdukh/

Yeah Mig-23BN or MiG-27 will be a must have for every Redfor pilot

How many aircrafts were built?

Do you need a ECM pod to have light.

Ka-52 mod have it. Probably only fit to Helicopters mod.

This video is a good footage. 15 degrees pitch. 800kph speed and distance seem to be 5km. Interesting -1505117794613741569.mp4

Make sense. So what is your fire setup to hit a narrow area using OFP2? So far, I do well only with KOM.

The loft bombing with S-8 work pretty well in DCS only with S-8KOM. The rest of the rockets have not same flight model, and they are barely or not at all accurate. I’m talking about the ballistic trajectory. It’s extremely different in comparison with the other similar variant S-8OFP. Please give it a try

我真的很難理解你在這裡想說的內容。你至少能嘗試用英語組成一個正確且連貫的句子嗎？如果您不能，請用您的母語輸入並使用Google翻譯，因為我相信這會有更好的結果。 現在，回到 N019 雷達和 R-27R 操作的細節。雷達以 30.72 毫秒的間隔在照明和無線電校正 (IL - RC - IL - RC) 之間切換。一枚飛彈的完整無線電校正週期需要 358.2 毫秒。如果在此期間間隔中斷（鎖定丟失），則雷達無法恢復它，因為它沒有基於軌蹟的存儲系統（雷達嘗試重新建立鎖定的時間很短） ）導彈也沒有足夠智能的電子設備來推斷最後收到的RC 命令之外的軌跡。至於 AIM-7，特別是較新的型號，它們確實具有 INS 和照明雷達，通常具有基於追蹤記憶體的架構以及 CW 照明（如果鎖定失敗）。不管怎樣，如果鎖被丟棄足夠長的時間，即使是麻雀也應該被扔掉——不知道目前在 DCS 中是如何工作的，所以也許有一些東西需要糾正。

UB should be a nice option

Se the video on Telegram from the first post. Loft bombing with rockets like in the Ukraine war

You are the only is mentioned lock missed. its way different than have a notch. Can you get that now?

This. I'm excited to know more about this Su-17 project. Because redfor have been struggling for long time to have a decent bombing task. Whoever made the current DCS developing map road for real was not a smart move. Lot of disbalance and nonsense missions with mixed western and Ru fighters to get a close sense of ground attack capability. Su-17 should get a close approach to a good mission logic. Su-25 it's a CAS very maneuverable but speed is key to get in enemy territory and sadly general Missions most of the time lack frontline, lack a good briefing and lack waypoint. So, the only fix to all that is afterburner and scape.

No, it's not. Make a test and if the opponent get a solid efective notch for a while, that R-27 is missed.

RWR on F-15E is not that precise or fast reaction in maneuvers, seem to be more on the real thing what those guys made. The ED western RWR are magical. You are misunderstanding relock with Notch. I'm talking about a Notch with a solid lock not too long distance. Yeah, everyone know how defeat the Aim-120, I will not go to the F-16 forum missiles to give that explanation. Sound gross and disrespectful.

You give tips to defeat the Mig-29A... you just forget mention the R-27 missile doesn't came back to guidance after the enemy leave the notch maneuver, such its wrong simulation behavior, Notch could take about one sec or two most of the time. The Russian missile become a miss after a single short notch WRONG!! AIM-7 do reacquire guidance very well so that issue is for ED. Have been so for quite long, make it an easy defeat to any Russian missiles.

Just try right now and you will se the differences. It’s only implemented on KOM

The only rocket that perform lofting bombing in DCS is the S-8KOM. Please improve that flight model for the rest of the Su-25 rockets, like S-8OFP and S-13, S-25 etc see OFP in action. There are more videos of S-25 doing this job. https://t.me/mod_russia_en/11972

IRST is not only for dogfighting… if you are a twin engine you will generate more heat. Also for F-16 single is a pretty big powerful engine to be compared with the tiny MiG-21, so F-16 is not that stealth on that regard. So you will be detected from a long distance. As you maneuver side to the IRST sensor you will show the hot side of your engine and R-27T/ET should effectively hit you even when you are maneuvering low on afterburner. another misconception is people tell the R-27T should be launched first to avoid the previous rocket burst. That’s not 100% correct. RU fighter can launch the T variant as second launch, just need to make dive banking maneuver before second T be on the way.

That’s wrong. Are you part of the development team? I’m scare to get an An-2 biplane avionics if ED follow all false information posted here.

Today I shoot down a F-16 from 10000m high, 25km away using R-27R. He was low and I was radar off. I turn Radar ON just over him. No chance to scape. R-27R still can do a good job using tactics

you can combine both so it's even better than FC3. FC3 have the IRST fixed as well on Mig-29. Su-27 have elevation and azimuth, it is way advanced compared to Mig-29.

it's not about game play or balance. The ER missiles must be there because is part of the Payload weapon, ET and EP as well. I understand you don't want that news, but if things go different, then as always, we are on the wrong direction ones again.