NotiA10

http://www.defencetalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=41 http://www.2la.org/syria/wmd/al-safir-dg-5.jpg http://img369.imageshack.us/img369/4199/sa10a2fd8.jpg http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread217139/pg1 ( you should like this one ! ) http://bbs.keyhole.com/ubb/printthread.php/Cat/0/Board/modEarthMilitary/main/406094/type/thread hope that the above links contain info relevant to what you are looking for. wbr,

wow !!! this looks very interesting

looking forward to it !

very nice !!!

Austria - no kangaroos here

good job and congrats !!!

same as strela - pretty much the same in lockon - my 2 cents

just take the 25 or 25T and land it on the carrier :pilotfly:

very nice :thumbup: p.s. pls dont forget that there is a paint scheme called JAWs :music_whistling:

am no 25 expert but i think (:music_whistling:) that the 25 has no autopilot at all

try to land on grass in the a10 mate (then you will se what no major harm means) :lol:

what do you mean with "complicatility" ? further more and with all due respect mate, but the 25T is not that hard to fly, even with its AFM. if a plane is to be called "hardcore" its the 25a imho

i dont think it is quite as simple as you say pilot. we did some tests with the am-9 on the 15 and the results were not conclusive.

Rgr that D, we will fly it one day !

i could be wrong but i believe that there might be an easy way, through editing some of his grafics.cfg file settings to not have any probs with higher settings. anyone know how to do it ? I remebmer seeing something but am now sure where and how it is done.

u would have some 30mm up your .... before you could even think about grabing this stinger from the backseat of your truck :lol: but on a serious note, yes it would make for very interesting gameplay if everything is on a study sim level.

well the SEAD targets can move (not many people make use of it in lockon) also they can popup and become active at a certain time not giving you any warning prior. these can be ir or radar sams or AAA. it really depends on the mission builder. now just imagine the complexity of being circled in by radar sams and AAA which all of a sudden popped up all aournd you in an area where you felt safe (according to intel). cheers, good times are ahead of us sim freaks, i think.

if you get hold of this study it would be interesting to see for sure. in regards to what you say about SEAD i have to disagree (you are correct in a gerneral when referring to most missions on hl though with some exceptions). Yes basically SEAD could be explained in my opinion also very simply the way you did it. However, there are factors like airspace, weather - example cloud cover and wind, terrain, type of target and its capabilities, location, surrounding unknown surface to air, available weapons etc etc which make it much more complicated than what it may seem - if you focus on surviving and completing the mission that is. I for myself like the concept of lockon and i sincerely hope that this will be continued in an enhaced form through DSC. Both A2A and A2G and maybe one day G2G (does this exist ? lol).

rgr that - from my personal professional experience i also like studies but i made the mistake once to not question it and to not go into details. Thing is that yes overall A2G can be split into several very different mission types. I think that many of them could be quite easy to get back into provided all the knowledge is still there. On the otherhand, if we talk about some very specific mission types (i didnt read the study so i just assume) which make up part of the result, their nature and the requirements maybe completely different. I cannot imagine that for example SEAD, CSAR and CAS are mission types where someone could easily get back into without constant training.

rgr GG, i agree with you that up to a certain degree it comes down to natural talent. however somethings can only be learned and keept fresh through practice. If not practiced on a regular basis these learned skills disappear, ala "use it or loose it". this very principle applies also (well i guess so) to both A2A and A2G. For some it is easier than the other and visa versa. What is the deciding factor whether it is easier for some to get back into A2A or A2G easier and quicker or not ?: maybe it is the talent and/or personal interest into one particular style.

well you must be a very good and gifted pilot then. speaking for my self, if i dont fly for 2-3 weeks it takes me quite some time to get back into it.

try the same with A2G. Its not any different sorry GG. This thread has gone a bit OT. The question is what interests you most and not what is more difficult or what is easier. I personally prefer A2G but at the same time i could not imagine the game without human controlled A2A. cheers

it would be great to have human controlled ground vehicles, especially for us groundpounders. Not that i personally would jump into a tank or a AAA, i will stick with the hog :thumbup: focus should remain however on realistic simulation and not become something like an FPS.

rgr that deadman - she is a monster in rl

thx kuky :thumbup: