JABO2009

really think so ? what I've seen so far this thing is just mindblowing and i've seen nearly all of these vids.. pre-ordered few days ago and cant wait for May to pass...

I've watched this on YT just recently .. nice vid

I hope they update the Mig 23 model next for the Persian Gulf Map !

Beautiful little Scooter !! Thx for the Update .. really excited for that nimble bird coming to life in DCS !

yes yes yes :thumbup:

I hope it wont develop that way tbh. the full fidelty modules are also behind a "paywall" If you wanna put it that way, but it didnt prevent many many players from buying them. If ppl would only go for free content only out there, we would have tons of Su25Ts and TF-51s flying around in Caucasus - which is - thankfully - not the case.

also my observation im MP ,, why there is hardly no more action on Nevada Map anymore?

also im DCS log file steht: 2018-04-26 15:20:56.699 INFO DCS: DCS/2.5.0.15365 Ebenso wird die "2.5.0.15365" auf der DCS GUI hauptseite rechts unten angezeigt.. ergo müsste ich lt der Info siehe link unten auf der "stable release" sein ... http://updates.digitalcombatsimulator.com/ EDIT: gerade den Quercheck mit "update @release" gemacht ; Meldung: "Version is up to date" .

Gut zu wissen, Merci !

okay , werde das abends mal checken.. ich bilde mir ein, die stable release drauf zu haben.. habe bisher immer mit "DCS_updater.exe update" befehl geforced ; ohne irgendwelche stable oder OB zusätze

Danke für die Klarstellung: ja ich habe manuell mit "DCS_updater.exe update" geforced ... habe das update aber dann nach 10 secs abgebrochen weil ich mir schon dachte dass das eher ne Konvertierung wird... Grund für mein Vorgehen war: mein autoupdate funzt noch nicht weil ich den entsprechenden Update Verweis auf meine SSD noch nicht gemacht habe ( keine ahg wie das geht) daher pushe ich immer manuell.. sonst tut sich da nix.. aber in diesem fall war es eben zu voreilig, weil ja das update nur für die OB draussen ist ... ich habe es aber abgebrochen. Daher bin ich aktuell -wie gewünscht auf der letzten 2.5er Stable release..

Bitte verzeiht die vl noob style frage aber ich habe aktuell die letzte Version der 2.5 release laufen... als ich gestern abend den updater manuell geforced habe , ist ein update von rd 10GB verfügbar, das wird dann das neue 2.5.1 OB update sein richtig ? Sprich wenn ich das update ausführe, springe automatisch auf die letztversion der 2.5.1 "OB" bis halt das nächste update auf die 2.5.1 release raukommt.. ist das so richtig ? Grüsse .

F.A.N.T.A.S.T.I.C !

This post should be put somewhere on a special place on the Forum here.. It's simply one of the most authentic DCS compliments Iv'e seen for a long time, and it's from real USAF guys !! I can imagine Wags and the ED Team reading this with a big grin :)

sry but this cant be generally said.. at least on my end, RAM makes a difference,... even in the range between 16 to 32 GB. Im playing on High settings (with some minor Med settings and shadows low)., and I sometimes get up to 22/23 GB RAM usage on crowded MP servers,, I was playing DCS with 24GB over the last weeks, which was fine, but now with 28GB its even better.. - DCS MP join gets a bit faster - "low FPS phase" when selecting Role in MP server got shorter - smoother Track IR - overall smoother feeling when flying low over terrain

Well Im fully with you on the "not to tell them how to do their Job" argument, but you did notice this is a "Wish List thread", right ?

I appreciate every 3D model which gets updated by ED and I hope this list gets amended by the Flogger soon, as it would perfectly make sense. :thumbup: We soon get eyecandy Tomcats and Hornets in an eyecandy Persian Gulf Scenario and I hope we wont see them encountering "Pixel Floggers" for too long :D

plus it's more safe to avoid "mishap ejections" by pushing the wrong buttons :)

thanks for sharing this ! I encounter similar behaviour with SSD and 24GB RAM , DCS is running fine atm, but on busy Servers I had issues sometimes. The biggest perfomance gain for me was to follow the recommendation of NineLine (thanks!) to reduce preload radius.. I set my preload to about 60% and now even busy MP servers are really enjoyable. will test with the new additional 8GB RAM block asap

With the upcoming Persian Gulf Map, at least some love to a new Mig 23 Flogger 3D model is my wish as its a hot adversary for F14 + F/A-18C , which will be involved in DCS soon. An eyecandy Flogger really would be a Thing ! Finally, with Modders like Cubanace already involved in some Mig23 Project , this would be nice to get the ball rolling again for the Flogger, say flyable mod etc..

Well, all my RAM blocks should have the same speed, as the specs & manufacturer (Corsair) is exactly the same. Spec of all my blocks: -> "DDR3 1333 Mhz CL 9-9-9-24" -

Thanks , appreciated ! Yeah, will give it a try.

Anybody here with unequal RAM Slot Settings who can report his DCS behaviour? I have the following DIMM pair Setting: DIMM O Slot : 8 GB DIMM 1 Slot : 4 GB DIMM 2 Slot : 8GB DIMM 3 Slot : 4 GB - >equals 24GB with same speed and same size configuration -> corresponding to the appropriate DIMM Slot I grabbed another cheap single 8GB RAM stick on the Internet recently and am thinking of adding this instead of one 4 GB Slot.. which would total up to 28GB but would mean an uneven size pair .. question: can this be recommended or simply non-sense as the uneven size setting isnt adding any real surplus to the system? (@ Mods: pls excuse if this post is too much hardware related here, I'll not broaden this any further ) .

Nice !

Why in the world should ED put much effort for "game mode" in a study level sim ? there are so many Jet "games" out there , pls let ED concentrate on the unique SIM we have with DCS.