A.S

Thx for that nice post.

Gonna try it tommorrow or next day...looking forward ..oh yess :joystick::thumbup:

Oh my god, bad flashback, baad horrortrip....dude....dont take that stuff anymore :megalol:

:megalol: LOLz ... ducktales

omg....:cry:

Hmm, correct me if im wrong, but doesnt the 9x not also have optical shape track besides heat track?

The good ole Pete Bonanni. His Book "Art of the Kill" from HoloByte is "better" though, but still not as advanced as Shaws´ "Fighter Combat". But he covers the very very basics in a nice way and if you dont know then Must Watch!

Good fun, in good old RedFlag fashion coordinated engagements. Nice support from CGI and being in coms with other pilots with teamwork is cream on the cake. Tomorrow again :thumbup:

How to avoid Birdstrikes :D

no worriess...there are dudes out there even more ticking off :lol: http://www.f15sim.com/ uups :huh: ...offtopic :tomato:

On the stream the 4-point rolls..and the bank-stop-banks looked very "dirty" yes.

Guys, you are really drifting in hyper-restriction fears here. Graphics.cfg and that what it can do is really minimal... There are other files way more crucial! (modellod.txt for example ...well most know how to make jets look huuuge over miles i assume..that cheat is leaked already here we have to think about a good modellod.txt file, considering if the new one ine 2.0 is good or not (oversized values again)) Besides haze, LOD, visib-range or values like FogParam1 = x; FogParam2 = x; ObjectFogMultiplier = x; noisemax = x; noisemin = x; } NoiseStrip { min = x; max = x; lod = x.; found in graphics.cfg...and modified by many (what i saw) are really really a miniaml risk and in my view even irrelevant. Lack of SA (Situation Awareness) might be due to the fact, that many approach BVR from a visual aspect...target-fixated (<< general term btw) and as a visual hunt for "dots".... You dont fly BVR hunting pixels or missiles trails...if you do so...you have bigtime missed something in understanding BVR combat/concept/doctrine/geometry Its not starwars and dodge-tomatoes flying.... You dont understand me here? Ok, what you do night, or really bad weather? I tell you what....excaclty the same if you have done it right in first place (day). ..thats my serious opinion on that..... anyways ...graphics.cfg shouldn´t be a "oh oh" watch out file.

everything "changed" by normal settings options shouldnt be listened as "check-files" such as grahics.cfg .....makes sense... it depends how deep we can use that tool once out... but once smart setted up, i can imagine a good start for finally waterproof STANDART servers and gameplay. finally... There used to be a program based on same principle (file-check) in Falcon. Additionally this tool could block certain keystrokes or function which unfortunatly have been used in exploited manner. Furthermore you had to register with that ACP (anti-cheat-program) in a server (license)...basically meaning...once busted...you were really done :) I hear creditable voices telling me that this changed the flightcharacteristics of so many. Im happy, lockon does have something now......im looking all the time for solutions to make a 3rd party ACP which can be configured and used for various sims.....partially im successfull but alot work...

One question to add: Can filecheck in 2.0 can be used to disable export.luas in clients (EnableExportScript = false/true) in order to block clients from sharing lua-files and in order to prevent leavu working for any clients joining to the host? Yes or No? If this is a solid solution, then ok. If not, still problem.

Well Grimes, overall thats right. My personal believes are, as long it goes for simulations, you should try to simulate the most real scenario possible. And if possible THIS in a balanced way. Arcadian compromises are really not my goals. But all that good and fine..i have bigger concerns. Back in days we had Mods, F14s shooting 54s around, we had tacview life monitoring, we had certain other mods, we had CLISD swapings..i dont know what else...the list goes on and on..and i dont wanna even recall all of it.......sick of it... Then LRM came and caused many discussions, but the good part about LRM was, the HOST could dictate what settings matter. The client was depending on that. With LEAVU everything changes. Not only that only people who own a 2nd monitor or a MFD-device can benefit from it, no, as that wouldn´t be enough, whose who use it can use it undetected, indepentend from serversettings, accessing externaly in the events of the host and generate a whole new data-network. Even the new file-check in 2.0 based on md5 or crc will not change it. A filechecking tool might check the files, but it cant track a external data-net work creating a total new "awacs-like" picture if you will for those who are using and connected with it. I have heart argumentations like 08.12.2009 05:25:25 xxxxx> TIR is not a global thing for all to use either ..." "08.12.2009 05:25:36 xxxxx > would you consider it a cheat to use it against someone who doesn't have one ? :)" "08.12.2009 05:25:52 xxx > a road is not illegal, driving too fast is" "08.12.2009 05:25:54 xxx > thats all i saty" "08.12.2009 05:43:56 xxx > im giving it away for free and you can block the people using it from your server thats your choice" [color=red]EDIT:[/color] [color=red]that s not true because leavu does not care about server settings, it shares the network between the clients[/color] [color=red]it is also wrong, that leavu can only share data, delivered by your wingman´s radar who is using same tool in same time.[/color] "08.12.2009 05:44:04 xxx> if you find it offensive AS" "08.12.2009 05:44:10 xxx > for me I like having clickable pit :)" "08.12.2009 05:44:15 xxx > Thanks" . . . "08.12.2009 05:44:26 A.S > no offense...valid question about misusage and security" "08.12.2009 05:44:29 A.S > As YOU KNOW" "08.12.2009 05:44:31 A.S > by yourself" "08.12.2009 05:44:33 A.S > ;)" "08.12.2009 05:44:39 xxx > well AS" "08.12.2009 05:44:41 xxx > tell that to ED" "08.12.2009 05:44:50 xxx > I cant do more than allow to block it" "08.12.2009 05:44:52 A.S > ah..i see..go ED now huh? ok" "08.12.2009 05:44:52 xxx > its not possible" "08.12.2009 05:44:57 xxx > mathematically impossible" or using TS is also an external tool ..etc etc..etc but those arguments are not compareable. Using devices is one story, using an application which can read-out and generate a whole new data-structure not meant to be in the core of the game (speaking of "balance") is something totally different. I dont understand why this is so hard to understand. Just because its cool? ..I dont know. It is promoted, that it is used to "produce" datalinks only but the problem is you can use it for way waay waay more. To my question in post http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=42942&page=47 So Leavu supports displaying your flight (wingmen) ? Do i understand that right? you get the answer Simulating key commands is not required. LEAVU has a direct lua input bus through ERI radar :) LEAVU sends "X,Y\n" to ERI, and if X and Y are numbers, it is interpreted as LoSetCommand(X,Y) Havent tested it yet though. Could be interesting! I give you one analogy what might help understand. Lets assume i give you a program, what allows you to fly with "easy radar" despite server settings, and it would allow you full picture of everything airborne including the missiles, would you use it? Honestly would you use it? Lets assume this program is called LEAWOW and its setted in such a way, that you only have datalink, in case of you dont change the settings of course? So would you change and use it? or are you just a good guy sharing a new program like i did it in this hypothetical example? To make it even worse, this developement comes from DevTeam supporters as an 3rd party application, and i really do wonder why there is no conflict of interest between DEV core and DEV supporters regarding the community feedbacks and the risk this provides. I hope the moderators dont get angry about this post seeing it as offtopic or such, but soo many voices are expressed by many meanwhile (as you can see in other posts too) but the main question is either ignored or unclear distracted. Sorry to say that...for me this is a clear (even made in good will) cheating-application. If you want to call it cheat or MOD....i dont know..up to everyone himself. And if you ask about the risks, the answer i got was ..."i use what i can, if it is not save, go ED and tell them to block it" ..kinda.. Well...i just did :) i hope.

Wild idea .... erm ..can someone make a cockpit mod kicking the MPCD out (in case of F-15) and putting in the LEAVU MFD with all combined functions in instead...yaay? For the russians it could be old MFD vs new MFD. Cause what i understand so far, only ppl with extrnal mfd-monitors or 2nd monitors really benefit from that ...right?

Excellent, so now what remains....is security :D (misusage)

Hihi....good one....you have two directional options 1 is you go full real 2 is you go full Hawx balance? balance what? .......you choose :lol:

Ok, fair enough. Leavu MFD snyc with VSD possible? (range)

I understood ... 1/3-rings ...personally (in AF) i use total centred and hit the DCPL CPL button to get a quick "look closer" snap. FCR / HSD sync ...But that´s just me. SOI and EXP....bolloks....way to much klick klick :D

figures, watched your heading..... so the other numbers are blank BS-coords..(makes sense, BS - BS range is 13nm .so your lock-range is) .ok. That little north arrow is sometimes very very very usefull...even in CAC.

You see, now things make sense. This pushes flights towards proper tactics in public servers rather then chaotic airquakes. :thumbup: Its good to know what the enemy does...but not less important to know what your flight/package does ;)

So Leavu supports displaying your flight (wingmen) ? Do i understand that right? like this (found quick what i mean) PS: add the NORTH-arrow...very usefull sometimes

As i see you use EPAF standarts, but i wanted to ask one thing all the time: Can you see your winmen as BLUE (blue on blue) ? If we speak about LEAVU´s supportive role in multiship and mutual support environment..now THEN it would be c:thumbup:ol. Just imagine how cool that would be remembering one of our old "scorpion tactics"...that little bit extended in depth.....clear picture of your flight....easily chilled exchanging airspace vs enemy airframes...ohh yess.