ac5

P-47 flight time is not appearing in the logbook..... Latest stable DCS world version.

Same here. With my settings of even gamma 2.2 or 2.4 ALL the other planes are OK, but the P-47 is too dark in the cockpit.

Yes, in the F-18 it is still there, but less. Though I agree, still annoying, as it prevents hearing the reeling down or up of the engine, VERY IMPORTANT to judge the status of the plane for us simmers. Oddly enough, I find the F-16 is quite OK... I wish there were a similar option to reduce that rumbling noise on the A-10.....

Yes, it is still there, but less. Though I agree, still annoying, as it prevents hearing the reeling down or up of the engine, VERY IMPORTANT to judge the status of the plane for us simmers. I wish there were a similar option to reduce that rumbling noise on the A-10.....

THANKS! That helps quite a lot!

I'd like that too, but now ED don't let us modify the sound files, with that odd new sound "system". VERY BAD AND DISAPPOINTING.

Same here, but that noise completely covers the engine, not allowing to hear the power applied. Something similar, although not so bad, happens on the A-10 C, I find the F-16 OK. And now ED don't let us modify the sound files, with that odd new sound "system". VERY BAD AND DISAPPOINTING.

Indeed... Inside the cockpit is quite OK, but outside.. Whisperquiet! And yes, with any sound setting..

I remember YEARS ago, there was a B-17 simulation, albeit with primitive graphics. You could be a bombardier with the norden bombsight, co-pilot, pilot, gunner.. Would be amazing to have something like this in DCS.

A joke indeed... I wanted to buy the Mig 19 with my bonuses, no way... It was released before August 1, 2019 no?

Recently updated to STABLE version 2.5.5.41371 Internal sound is now OK, but from the outside, the MIG 21 STILL sounds like a Boeing 787... Whisper quiet... And yes, at any sound level / setting.

Definitely NOT. Don't you think that ED and the other devs have enough to do as it is?

Indeed... I have observed the same behaviour. Lamps as well.

I just can't accept this. ED should CLEARLY mark that the update for the WWII Assets is ONLY for the beta. This is not the case.

Well, at least in the JF-17 module shop page is clearly stated: You need to have the "Open Beta" version DCS World 2.5 installed on your PC for this product. But in the DCS: WWII Assets Pack It is stated, and I quote: You only need to have the "Stable" version DCS World 2.5 installed on your PC. ???

This is simply not true. The F-16 is very much in EA state, and can be installed in the stable version. And so are and were other modules.

Well, that's just great... NOWHERE is mentioned that this update to the World War II Assets Pack will not work in the latest STABLE VERSION 2.5.5.41371!!! I even bought it again, uninstalled, installed again, no JU-88 or the other stuff there. VERY disappointing.

Well, that's just great... NOWHERE is mentioned that this update to the World War II Assets Pack will not work in the latest STABLE VERSION 2.5.5.41371!!! I even bought it again, uninstalled, installed again, no JU-88 or the other stuff there. VERY disappointing.

What has "it was years before 1.5 and 2.0 got merged" to do with this? As far as I remember it has never taken so long for the release version to be updated...

I am well aware of the problems in the Beta 2.6... but..... Rush? It's been 4 months!

Look at the title: Does Updating stable version delete mods

Hello ED, it's been almost 4 months since the last stable update... On the 12 of April a small Hotfix-Patch came updating to 2.5.5.41371, not an update to 2.6 stable....

Hello ED, it's been almost 4 months since the last stable update... On the 12 of April a small Hotfix-Patch came updating to 2.5.5.41371, not an update to 2.6 stable....

Hi, please help! I have my DCS installed in a different drive, D:\DCS World, and this does not work.....

And even Normandy now smooth as silk...