Raven434th

love to have this for my plane set...count me in please.Thankyou,,,anyways...A dog and a pony walk into a bar...."CENSORED"

Came in for a crash landing ,skidded down the runway and started to bounce like a rubber ball in the same place it stopped. Plane kept leaping about 12 feet into the air and wouldn't stop. Makes me wonder if this isn't the reason takeoffs are so "touchy". We need some gravity weight on these birds when on the ground.

When the mig21 gets hit and destroyed, the missiles are still attached to where the wings would be...also when jumping into an AI plane using alt j...the afterburner stays on graphically

Bug is still here post 1.14...if it even is a bug??

Problem still exists post 1.14

Problem still exists...what's the word ED?

I want the Mig-21 and a pony

Only 3 guns are showing as firing...but the ammo count bars are dropping on all 4 guns. No flame on right wing cannon.

Pffft ...have been ....for years

Don't forget to tell them about the waypoint numbers missing in the su25T

Where are the waypoint numbers displayed in su25T????

When entering a tank...turret slews to rear and can't be over rode until the slew stops.:joystick:

There are still problems with key movement key mapping... this needs some going over by the coders big time

OOOKKKKAYYY...that was the ticket. Thanks a lot. I wonder why this is though??? And is this documented anywhere? Also what is the general category for??

Oh thank god ...I thought it was only me...no offense yup this totally makes ca unplayable. Question is whats going on???BTW I have a x-55 if that's a help

Yeah well there's diffinately something wrong...I also have double entries in the command column.. ie.. I see rotate turret left and underneath it is rotate turret left again.Something is screwed up somewhere as I don't have any control as to what appears in the command columns,that's their end as far as I know. I even deleted the config file and generated a new one...same problem. And If it was something on my end I would have the same problems when applying axis commands to aircraft...which I don't.

I dunno even where to start...but a good indication would be that even if you completely clear all axis movement input...it still receives input. MAPPING THE MOVEMENT FOR GROUND CONTROL AXIS IS COMPLETELY BROKEN

I don't think the ET is in question here...but then again....hmmm

Meaning what ...that its a disadvantage to do so???...I beg to differ...the Ka50 reference to make my point.One targets at distance...other engages at shorter range with stealth. Advantage.

HOW would it NOT be desirable to be able to launch a missile to a target WITHOUT radar lock in combat???? Are you nuts?? Hehe...no offence. Also I think its pretty clear what he's saying...LOCK ON AFTER LAUNCH IS POSSIBLE with a R-27 ER due to command inertial guidance. I don't think thats a misinterpretation. The straight up question here is ... is he right or not. You say he's wrong. I don't know but there seems to be other sources that I picked up right away that support his statement. Unless... its ONLY after an initial radar lock...which isn't really clear ...so that leaves some doubt.

This on wiki: R-27R and ER variants can be used in any meteorological conditions. Launch can made at less than 5 g overload and less 50 deg/s roll rate.[3] It is allowed to redesignate targets during flight, or sharing target illumination with other aircraft. Regarding the ka50 ,the context was target info sharing and designation

well I was thinking more AWACS really....but any data should apply as far as the launch aircraft KNOWING where the target is ,and then sending that data to the missile. Which is what I believe this guy is saying...I think. And even if he is wrong I still wonder why the Russian systems don't take advantage of this data for a "pre intercept" track to gain advantage on said intercept. I mean doesn't the blackshark do something similar??

Theres no problem...except that this guys says different...and makes sense given that the launch aircraft has SA on the target via data link and hands it over to the guidance system onboard the missile for loal launch...so who's right?? You or him. Cause your both on different tracks in a big way. I simply don't know who to believe.

what I mean is...he says the missile gets target info based on data either from the data link...or radar. And in the case of data link (described as mathematical targets)...the missile is capable of flying towards the target based on that data alone , therefore can be locked onto target AFTER launch. Which makes sense IF the aircraft utilizes the data link data for targeting...which you say it doesn't ...is what I'm getting at, and that makes me wonder why it doesn't.It would make sense as a silent launch or surprise attack for BVR.

So its not broadcasting data link data to the missile then?(makes me wonder why that is since the launch aircraft knows where the target is) I wonder why this guy says what he says then...it puts his statements in the "extremely wrong" category...providing he is wrong of course.