Jump to content

LordOrion

Members
  • Posts

    1582
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by LordOrion

  1. I'm not an expert, but mine seems to be something like JST-PH 2.0 2mm.
  2. Mine is identical, except for the presence of a logo:
  3. In the end I opted for the 300mA version (better be conservative), which also has the correct black-on-left polarity. It will arrive on Friday 11...
  4. I'don't have soldering equipment atm. I can buy one on Amazon (I know how to proper use it) but buying the correct battery is cheaper
  5. https://www.amazon.it/dp/B0CYWTW7MC/?coliid=I1AYDK6U5KAGHC
  6. Uhm... I've received the new battery but looks like the connector pitch was worng (1.25mm, I need 2mm). My fault: I should have checked before (I will return it). In the meantime I found another one which is compatible, but the I have to choose between: 300mA, 1.11W 500mA, 1.5W 1200mA, 4.44W Which one is the right/better in your opinion? https://www.amazon.it/Batteria-LIPO-300-mAh-Polazione/dp/B0C66BRMM5/
  7. Minor changes like some Typo fixes maybe? Only Chuck knows.
  8. For 16 euros is worth to try. Connector seems exactly the same.
  9. Surpirse! Looks what I found on Amazon: https://www.amazon.it/Batteria-ricaricabile-elettronici-sostituzione-incorporata/dp/B0CP24PYGY Looks really similar to the one I had...
  10. Unfortunately the battery is really gone: I've connected to to the charging cable and measured the voltage wich seems to be ok (approx 5Volts). However, I left it charing the whole night and once disconnected the voltage was back to less than 4Volts. I've removed the silver envelopment: still no markings but a strange stink... I gave up at this point, I will buy another clip asap.
  11. I won't open the silver envelopment now (better do it tomorrow with the light), here is a detail (fron and back) of the circuit: connections seems to be ok: My multimeter says there are 3.88Volts between the 2 metallic strips that goes into the silver envelopment, but the same voltage is present between the soderings of the red/back cables and at the top of the connector to the clip socket. Looks like the battery might be still good after all...
  12. I did but, as you can see below, the situation does not change too much (no markings), apart for the fact that I found there is a small circuit on the battery top (voltage regulator for recharge?). Looks like this is a custom made/modified battery for the purpose.
  13. After 5 years of honored service the battery of my wireless TrackIR IR led clip (which actually is a wireless clone of the official IR led clip) has decided to "retire" and can't be charged anymore. The clip itself still works in wired mode: I can buy a new one on Amazon, but before paying 60+ euros for a new clip I wander if it is possible to find a replacement for the battery... anyone know what kind of battery could fit it? I took a pic of the dismountetd battery (actually it was just taped to the clip), no other markings that the one you see:
  14. There are some user-made campaigns available on the User-Files section of the game website, and some of them are not bad at all. And moreover, we can use the F-15E within both Liberation and Retribuition dynamic campains.
  15. I'm not 100% but 1000% agree with you about this
  16. Don't take it personally, but to me that seems just "wishful thinking". Maybe that's just a matter of seeing the glass "half full" or "half empty" but I prefer to hope fot the best and get ready for the worst. And I'm saying this hoping to be badly wrong
  17. ED and RB that does not settle up the dispute IS the worst case scenario: in that case we will much probably lose immediately the support/further development not only for the F-15E but for all RB modules. And in the mid/long term we will completely lose them the same way we lost the Hawk some years ago. It's not a pretty prospect, but it's realistically what could happen if everything went to hell. There is nothing "misleading" in my posts, just read them carefully with the correct context. And there is no need to be so upset.
  18. I think it's already clear enough, (just read all the related posts in the thread).
  19. An User asked for the worst case scenario and I gave him the worst case scenario I agree with you that ditching the F-15SE whould have a bigger impact that the Hawk, but keeping alive a dead module forever is something completely unrealistical. It won't happen in the short term, but one day ED will have to choose between continuing to support the SE or introducing one or more improvements/changes to the game's Core Engine that will make it incompatible. So, in case of SNAFU, I'm sure ED will do its best to keep alive the SE as long as possible, but be prepared to lose it one day.
  20. In case of SNAFU the module won't receive any furter updated or fix and it will continue to work for a while, but at the end it will be gone as the Hawk.
  21. Same here, order #2242028 of 03/19/2025 23:19:37 completed but then disappeared from my account.
  22. Are you saying we can't use GBU-27 to settle legal disputes?
  23. Pride and business don't go particularly well together: ED knows that sending RB to go hell would leave a lot of "unhappy" users with a really low trust in ED accountability, which probably won't buy another 3rd party module untill the hell freeze. Much better swallow the pride, try fix the issue with RB and then try to find a way to avoid such kind of problems in future modifiying the ED vs 3rParty dev agreements.
  24. First of all the must finish all missing stuff for Harrier, M-2000C and (obviously) F-15E. Then, RB should release a really interesting module... M-2000-5 / Mig-23 are not interesting enough to me. And even if they did both of above, I will wait for the end of Early Access before buy.
×
×
  • Create New...