LordOrion
-
Posts
1582 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by LordOrion
-
"si" ad entrambe le tue affermazioni. Che io sappia gli aggiornamenti si scaricano solo in automatico usando l'apposito tool installato con il gioco.
-
Ho gia' fatto il cambio 2 volte, confermo che ti basta copia & incollare la cartella di installazione sul nuovo drive e aggiornare i link.
-
Se posso darti un consiglio, evita di usare TARGET e configura il tuo HOTAS direttamente dal menu' di DCS. E' molto piu' facile e rapido, oltre che molto piu' flessibile:
-
Dell'apache non so nulla, ma l'AP del viper a me funziona... :uhm:
-
Not an expert of the Jeff but yes, it supports the CCIP mode for unguided bombs, se Chuck's Guide (always be blessed) chapter 12, section 2.1.1 for details.
-
Nice!
-
Fuzing options have been here for some time now but honestly speaking I still haven't figured out how to use them properly, mainly because I haven't found any document that clearly explain the differences between various fuzes and how/when use them, especially for cluster bombs. Is there any good guide/tutorial which can help me? Thank you and merry Xmas!
-
1998 I remeber I saved money from xmas, birthday and my weekly allowance to buy the Matrox Mystique I need in order to allow my poor Pentium 133MHz to run it (without, my hardware was under the minimum specs). I loved that game, as well as I loved Janes'F/A-18E and Microprose F-15 Strike Eagle III, but none of them was better than the RB F-15E in term of simulation.
-
100% agree. Fox-2s are a welcome addition. More than them whould be completely out of scope.
-
IMHO, even if unrealistic, the Fox-IIs would be a welcome addition for the Macchino.
-
I stopped believing in Santa Claus many, many years ago...
-
I'm waiting since the began of this mess, and in the meantime I heard a lot of nonsenses: You can also stop being mysterious, one more or one less makes no difference. Keeping my finger crossed for any "good-ending" solution. And If we get a "bad ending", well, I think I will enjoy AV-8B, M200C and F-15E as long as they continue to work in DCS while looking forward for some new module... The EF-2000 as an example. I won't be that drastic: I'll just stop buying Razbam stuff (including other platforms)... We'll see if it's out of obligation or choice
-
They are still in business? I feel relieved: many users swore that without ED's money at Razbam they were in serious trouble! There were reports of people seen medicating on the street...
-
Do you know something we don't ?
-
2x AIM-9 whould be an HUGE improvement for the Tiger...
-
Don't worry And I totally understand your point: I had to wait for this remaster of my beloved F-5 for a while too. It probably depends on how much interest there is around the specific module, but I think that ED will update all the old modules as they already did for A-10, KA-50 and now the F-5E.
-
I wasn't referring to you specifically mate
-
No, but is getting worse
- 131 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- f-5e
- f-5e tiger ii
- (and 3 more)
-
That would be nice. However I'm wandering why we cannot have an F-20 Tigershark: that whould mean not only AGM-65 but AIM-7/AIM/120 too (and 4x AIM-9)!
-
... and no one complain about that. Looks like "complaining" for any new stuff coming is the new "cool thing" among many DCS users nowdays.
- 131 replies
-
- 2
-
-
- f-5e
- f-5e tiger ii
- (and 3 more)
-
The clarification is just few lines below:
- 131 replies
-
- 4
-
-
- f-5e
- f-5e tiger ii
- (and 3 more)
-
Title New version of the module will be released soon. -
We already have GBU-12, just can't lase them.
-
https://x.com/eagledynamics/status/1859975626037313962
-
- 131 replies
-
- 8
-
-
- f-5e
- f-5e tiger ii
- (and 3 more)