some1

So if it is not a bug, how do we attack a moving target now?

Yeah, the Mav in the Hornet does not follow TGP any more. It will slew only to the initial position once uncaged. Probably Viper changes broke it. Or yet another WIP feature.

Guess where the bombs will fall.... Same problem with Mav indicator on HUD in Vis/Bore mode. BTW why TPOD cross/gate and north symbol are gray instead of white like the rest of the symbols? They are completely invisible against some backgrounds. tpod.trk

I don't think you can. In this mode TGP is slaved to Mav, not the other way round. So make MAV a SOI and slew it directly.

Unlike every other airframe in DCS, Mavericks are not powered if mission begins in the air. You still have to wait 3 min to use them.

You can't ground stabilize if the target is too far away. But thanks for the tip, I'll play with those special settings, haven't noticed them before :)

No, as I said it's a normal convention in Windows. Towards the user is +, away from the user is -. That's how the throttle looks in Windows with all axes full forward:

Each aircraft has separate assignments and also there are different settings often for game and sim mode. Are you sure you're assigning them in correct place?

The axis control for TV/IR missiles needs to be faster at max deflection, especially when zoomed in. Right now it is not possible to track a ground target just a few degrees below horizon, like on a screenshot below. The ground moves faster, than you can slew the seeker.

It's normal, just a convention used in Windows. If it's reversed in game, click the invert checkbox, that's what it's for.

Not rotate. Move sideways. Or when you look at something that moves sideways, like the terrain. Smoothing head rotation is handled by lower-level smoothing algorithm that is always enabled, something Oculus calls Asynchronous Time Warp (ATW) but other companies use something similar. On the other hand, reprojection (or ASW) smooths also translational movement. That's why reprojection on/off look basically the same if you just sit in the cockpit and pan your head around. But if you start moving the head sideways, without reprojection the instruments will blur.

I fell sorry for Baltic Dragon as his works are always exceptional and now he is also dragged into this affair. But that's the point. Why call something complete, when it clearly is not. The manual is just one among many things that need attention.

Is that a bug?

Hey, I found my old thread when they did exactly the same thing with M-2000. https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=186951 Then it was a matter of "priorities change" and the Mirage was improved eventually.... 2-3 years later. Wonder how long it will take in case of the Harrier and if DCS will still exist by then.... I'm sure preorders for the F-15E will start soon enough.

That video contradicts your statements. Look at None of the aircraft slams the nose to the ground. They are more likely to bounce back in the air on hard touchdown than drop the nose. And it doesn't look like any pilot make a special attempt to aerobrake by pulling the stick - they just let the aircraft settle down and begin normal braking.

Looks like even a proper manual is not required for a module to leave Early Access. Why am I surprised, they pulled the same thing with M2000.

The ability to place mobile RSBN and TACAN stations in DCS editor is long overdue.... This stuff is mounted on wheels for a reason:

So where's this: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=280854 and this: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=232106 and this: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=256371 and this: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=256372 and this: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=228192 and this: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=243812 and this: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=243813 and this: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=282104 According to Razbam bugtracker AV-8B has ONE confirmed bug, and couple feature requests. This is beyond silly.

Their bugtracker is empty because no one is putting the bugs reported on these forums. They skipped a lot of issues.

A fundamental issue is that LODs are not switching evenly for both eyes. Meaning that at certain distances you can see a more detailed version of 3D model in one eye, and a lowpoly version in the other eye. This also applies to some effects like fire, explosions, etc. And I'm not talking about config tweaks, I don't have shared_parser enabled or any other mods and the issue is still there. It's like no one at ED really plays this game in VR. It's not that hard to notice.

No it isn't like that in real thing. Just read the bug reports on ADF functionality.

40% that never expires just for saying "don't tell me anybody is testing this thing, I won't believe you"? Somebody must have felt offended after I posted four or five bug reports withing half an hour just for one aircraft and found the first opportunity to send me on a forced holiday. I don't see any other reason, people make such comments here all the time. I also did not have any active warning points before that, so please don't spin it like I made multiple offences and this was just the last one.

You describe one type of bugs: hard to find, easy to reproduce, easy to fix. In all other categories, (Hard to reproduce - even with tracks, or hard to fix), your help is negligible compared to amount of work the devs need to put in order to solve the problem. But yeah, in the end we get a better product, so our motivations don't matter that much. Of course not! Officially it was for "I don't believe it was tested" comment in one of the reports, which surely qualifies for a ban here.

Don't kid yourself, I got 40% warn and a month long ban on this forum for reporting too many bugs and complaining about lack of proper QA on the developer's side. Bug reporting is mostly for your personal gain, as you have a chance of getting a better product in the end. A product for which you've usually paid in advance BTW. If the thread author wants to help ED, there are better ways to do that than sending more work their way. :)

It's quite possible that recoil has been removed from the rockets intentionally, and they simply forgot to adjust the autopilot accordingly. There was some debate whether rockets should push back the plane or not.