Ukr_Alex

Yea, the new architecture changes the effect of clocks. Intel is more along the lines of AMD as far as pure clocks go now. My 3ghz Conroe is double the speed of my 3.4 P4 800fsb just for comparisons sake ;) On single core perfomance roughly.

If black shark utilizes both cores then I think its safe to say it will run at least at 50fps as I know IguanaKing and me have the hardware to take care of the rendering end. A combined speed of 6ghz on a x1900 series with 2 gigs of ram....damn. Besides I think BS is more optimized so we simply will run much faster then now.

I had the same problem however Im ok now. I made the mistake as mentioned before of following the target with the piper. And making big adjustments with my joystick once again trying to follow. What I do now is simply wait for the enemy to cross my piper itself and then fire. Once I see him starting to move into my sight I prefire and usualy get a hit. But you always want to shoot slighty ahead of the direction that the enemy is moving in. But Im talking "slight" so these are all very fine movements that someone watching you from the back wouldnt even notice. P.S And is it just me or its more common to simply load up FBP put the AI to excelent and do "guns only" battles? I find my self doing this 70% of my lomac play time.

Oh no I got nothing against Cali Im just surprised he said "you dont need AA or AF ay 16x12". You still see the jaggies at 16x12. Even 3 years ago when I couldnt run lomac with a gun pointed to my head and an angry redneck on the trigger :P I still bumped the AA to see what it looks like, and from that moment it was my goal to run AA as much as I can.

huh? I run 1680x1050 and I wish I had more AA. 8x or 10X, running 6x now. As for AF. Well its an image quality thing, regardles of resolution. But 16x already seems enough as you can see everything ahead of you very clearly at all resolutions when its 16x. I hate jaggies, and no mater what rez you will still have them. And the more AA the less jaggies. P.S On my 1900xtx AA or no AA seems to have an absolute minimal FPS hit. Im talking 2-3 fps with AA at 6x or no AA.

Well there is not much to comment on. Just a bunch of people with random models supposedly trying to stick em into lomac. For example that longbow model is a personal mega detail one with 250 000 polys. The rest just seems like a bunch of unfinished projects or wips. Also an ED team member said that we will see a new Su and Mig model from ED he just cant say when.

Спосиба, ничево так игрушка, даже быстро пичатать могу. :)

W00t you guys talkin' 'bout heeaar.? My lowest FPS seems to be 22 over Sevastopol... either way, even at 22 it still feels smooth as silk... Oh and I dunno how accurate that FPS meter in the game is. I came to realize that a lot of ingame FPS meters are not accurate, thats why I like to use fraps or something along the lines of fraps. But Im yet to use fraps on lomac.

Ny ladna, prosto nichevo pisat' nebydy.... S yvazeniem, Oleksandr Ciao P.S Esli y kovoto est voprosu naschot kompa polzuite PM.

1680x1050 32bit 6x AA 16xAF High Quality, MipMap Quality maximum. V igre vse optscie na maximum. Force feedback na joystike vkluchen. Su-27 Campaign Pervaya Missia FPS: Na zemle pri vzlojote iznutri sushki 26FPS. 250 metrov zemloi metrov iz nutri 30FPS+ kucha F16, F5, Su-27, Mig-29 v nebe raketu sa vseh staron FPS 40-80. Iz naryzu FPS ot 25 do 180 zavisimo at samaloyta, visotu i ygla kameru. Su-33 nad semferopolyom iz nutry nezavisimo ot visotu 100metro do 1000metrov FPS ot 20min do 35. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- No daze kagda 20FPS igra prosto gladkaya,,, kagda FPS menyats s 20 do 50 daze ne zametno. I vsyo shto tol'ko mozno vkluchino na maximum.

Thanks for the quick answer and a great explantion unlike Pilotasso who instead of point out the issue tries to play a smart@ss :) P.S If all these mods can be turned into smooth sailing addons then they will be much more popular. Youd be shocked how many people would have a hard time editing the cfg and would simply give up on a great mod :(

Great model but has anyone made a higher rez texture for it? It looks Ok from distance but up close the texture seems a bit pixalated at 1680x1050 Thanks in advance,

Looks great but have the the modders figured out a away to make the installations easier? Sitting there editing config files such a pita. The mig-29 fuel tank needs texture editing. The Aim 120 needs cfg editing... Just askin if there are fixed modman files or I have to go through the install myself?

Padskazu kak vkluchit' FPS pakazatel' v igre a to ya zabul.

Fignja vse, y menja 3 giga na moyom Conroe i LOMAC gruzit procesor na vsju katyshky. 50-60% kagda ya prosto ALT-TAB nah desktop delayu. A v igre na polnom ekrane gryzit na vse 100%.

WoW man you crossed the line there buddy! :P Blasphemous sh*t!

Nothing wrong, the Catalyst doesnt run at Vmax during regular 2d applications. It only goes to full specified ram/gpu speed when you run a 3d application.

Thank you kindly. I'll be grabing the aerial refuling one.

Dunno, all I can say is that all my settings are maxed out...and I dont like playing around with them cause I have to go back and reset my aspect ratio each time :(

Dont get me wrong. Its a stellar aircraft, I just dont like it. Personal thing. I think its ugly and it doesnt excite me. I come from sim racing, which deals with cars which is all about "soul" not speed:P And I just dont see it in the Falcon.

And how much is it going cost? 200$???100$?

Too bad its a boring ass F16 :( Dunno why I never liked that bird. F15 yea, F18 yea....F16 borring!!! *Puts on the flame suit jumps in his mig-25 and tries to escape the earth's gravity pull. *

I got the same problem with half black tank in 1.12a and installed correctly.

Having worked with a game developer before throughout very early beta to 7months later realse candidates and finaly the release I can tell you that there are tons of things that can be done to make a "game" faster. Its not just about the poly count on the models. Just tons of optimization, from code to models. I remeber bare models in early beta being more FPS hungry then the final full blown version. I think that there is simply tons of code in lomac and physics modeling that is not running as efficinetly as it could. And optimizing it to the max might be a long long long process which just isnt worth it. Because when you look at lomac from third person, graphics wise its nothing spectacular, and its something modern hardware should not have problems coping with. P.S. WTF This thread is like 2 years old lol :P

My questions is why now? To me SLI or CrossFire is a technology that is great for the future. For example I have an x1900. And I cant find any game that puts it to work at this time. In a year or 2 when they release a card double the performance of the current x1900 or 1950 I will buy a second x1900 at a much much lower price then it is sold for now and still be able to keep up with the video cards of 2 years from now. So instead of blowing up 6 bills on a new video card 2 years from now, I can keep my current hardware dish out another 200-250$ and be at the top of the video card food chain. No dx10 goodies? Oh well, but Ill still get the FPS. However having 2 high end cards in one rig at this point in time is a useless benchmark bragging rights practice. A single GPU like a 7900 or a x1900 can more the cope with todays games as long as you are well supported in ram and CPU dept. I guess some people have unlimited budgets...but all these years I have managed to be 10-15% off top benchmarks while buying things that cost much less. Back in the day I had a ti4200 running faster then ti4600s, now I have a E6300 which is running at E6700 but which I now can do 3.3GHz on air with good cooling but I am limited by my ram which already OCed beyond expectations at native timings... Those saying CPU OCs yield little gain well CPUs are not all about MHz. So it's not surprising when a 15% oc on the chip shows little gain in lomac. And trust me its not only lomac, its just about anything. Now OC your chip by 50% and you'll see a difference. It's like running ram at CAS2 or CAS3....well it aint that huge, but price difference is. Ive seen many people with better "paper spec" systems then my'n run games worse then me. It just isnt about putting a system together, smaking Windows on it and off you go. It's a lot about getting the right chipset drivers, finding the right video driver and not just the latest from ATI or NVIDIA. Its about going through BIOS getting that set up...not running bullsh*t apps in the background etc etc...