Jump to content

JumpinK

Members
  • Posts

    376
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by JumpinK

  1. I think NVGs are a built in feature of the JHMCS but I could be wrong.
  2. DAMN! I can not even think about flying in DCS with an Xbox gamepad! :huh: TM Warthog must have been a huge game changer to you...:joystick: ...but the fact that it is more difficult to use the sensor slew on your warthog is really funny! :lol:
  3. ...cat shots and carrier traps all day long... (same as with the F-18 but not as lonely because of Jester):pilotfly:
  4. Wenn das Ding kompatibel mit dem Warthog is, dann MUSS ich es einfach haben!!! :joystick::D
  5. Thanks a lot, Sir!!! Working like a charm now! :)
  6. Mr. Alerax! This script is really really nice! Absolutely GREAT!!!:thumbup: There is only one little suggestion i want to make. Could you please get in contact with mr. funkyfranky, because he also did a very very cool script, but due to some different "unit name"/"carrier name" requirements in your scripts it seems they do not work simultaneously. Maybe it could be possible for you guys to make it work?:music_whistling: This would be amazing!
  7. Today I found out, that this script (which is really awesome btw!!!) does not work with Alerax's LSO script (which is also awesome btw!!!) due to the specific "unit name"/"carrier name" requirements. Could you mr. funkyfranky and mr. Alerax please communicate with each other to make these two scripts work simultaneously?!:music_whistling:
  8. Great script! Thanks a lot!!!
  9. Are there any news on this one? The viking-model isn't very nice to watch during refueling and the KC-130 got really boring now... ...i think we all waited long enough to get a working KC-135BDA. I wonder what could be the problem since it doesn't look like it would be too much of coding work to get the connection points between probe and drogue right?!
  10. +1 cat-launches, aerobatics and carrier-traps all day long!!!:D (sometimes i even forget the hornet can carry weapons!);)
  11. +1 ground crew: "extend/retract ladder" <--- this would be a really nice option!
  12. Sounds very good. A cat that runs as smooth as the viggen might get some (still not very smooth) hornets grounded...
  13. Same here. BUT rebinding the keys every few updates is a bit annoying. I hope they got it now.
  14. ...unless you're at bingo fuel somewhere over the deep blue sea and your only available landing field is a tiny little aircraft carrier... :P
  15. +1 :D
  16. I'm quite sure a licence is needed even for having backseat-ride only. But trust me, it will be totally worth the money!:D Though you can decide yourself then if you wanna play as maverick or goose...;)
  17. Both. If you play in RIOs seat, AI-pilot flys the tomcat. (Forgot the name heatblur has mentioned)
  18. Sure, but not every virtual pilot is also a photoshop-pro. :smilewink:
  19. THIS would be a great implementation! (not only for F-14 but for F-18 as well) +1:thumbup:
  20. just purchased and super happy now! :D (maybe a little off topic, but I really wanted to tell somebody that I'm gonna be a tomcat pilot very very soon!):pilotfly:
  21. :thumbup: These screenshots are absolutely georgeous!
  22. JumpinK

    F-15E?

    I'm just making my own fun out of this thread... ...personally for me it doesn't matter if the F-15E will come with removable CFTs or not. I'm eagerly waiting for my most favourite bird anyway! I don't wanna offend anyone here, but why not think "bigger"?! Meaning, it would be an awesome extra-realistic feature if the CFTs were removable but it is absolutely not necessary in DCS. I'm curious now whether RAZBAM will implement this feature of the Strike Eagle or not.
  23. JumpinK

    F-15E?

    Ok. I'm out. Just one more: F-15E without removable CFT shouldn't be called full fidelity then. because IRL regardless of usage they can be removed! Sorry, i had to.
  24. JumpinK

    F-15E?

    well... ...to me it seems that this video is the best argument for removable CFTs in DCS. :D
  25. JumpinK

    F-15E?

    I don't get it, sorry. Because why would they ever build an aircraft with removable CFT's and then not ever remove them? I assume, they wouldn't be called CFTs if they had been modeled together with the rest of the airframe and if so they would not be removable then. No offence. Of course i could be very very wrong with my opinion, because I'm not an expert, just a hobby-aviator and a DCS-enthusiast.:smilewink:
×
×
  • Create New...