Jumbik

One has to wonder why are the sales pretty much every month. ED caught itself in a loop when people do not buy modules outside of sales because they are so common and thus ED has to do them so common in return? Never ending circle? Btw the Steam version does have a reason because then I have the freedom of choice if I want to play it directly from Steam or not because buying the game on steam gives me also the standalone key. It's not the other way around though and I'm automatically cutting myself from the Steam community.

Official WW2 scenario will be Normandia.

Releasing F-18C without at least reskined and working USA carrier would be a shame. I can understand that they would charge for a whole package DLC with working Naval ops, air control, radio, deck action, navigation etc. But releasing only airplane with no option to use it on carrier would be really bad. Maybe understandable for beta but not full release.

Does anybody know if there is any eta for Win10 drivers? Thank you.

I would like to ask a question. What is the difference between the Iba effect software and SimShaker? If I want to use the Jetseat with DCS, what software should I install? Thank you.

So it seem we will see the improved RDI radar in Mirage :) https://www.facebook.com/Metal2Mesh.Development/posts/908156169256586:0

We are in first row looking at DCS radar revolution in action. :D

I'm so glad to see that you are on good way. I suppose the Mirage will be first DCS aircraft with advanced radar modeled (not counting MiG-21 here) and that's an achievment on it's own. I wish you the best for 2015 release, I hope you can make it. It would make an excelent Christmas present for us all and some nice holiday bonus for you I hope. :) Great work!

Few months back they said that the Nevada looked mostly perfect in the editor but when they imported it for the first time to the game engine, it got a lot more orange color to it and stopped looking good and realistic. Since then they are trying to correct that and its part of the reason we dont have the map yet.

I have asked my friend who is working at the airfield here in Czech Republic if he could ask the L-39 guys for some nice photos. Hopefully I will report soon with them. :)

I would say try both and choose the one you like better. The Aircrafts are close in performance but are used in very different ways. For example I LOVE the helmet sight in Flanker coupled with R-73 and datalink. And at the same time I LOVE the active missiles in F-15 and the ability to engage more than one target at the same time. But in overall the Flanker is much more demanding for pilot skills and you have to maintain the control over the plane pretty much nonstop. From a pure begginer point of view you will do better in F-15 most of the time though.

From what they have wrote they want the DCS version be based on the Tacpack version in FSX. http://www.razbamsims.com/store/product_info.php?products_id=86 Here is something more...

For those who do not follow the Facebook page of Razbam sim, they have mentioned there yesterday that they will indeed bring A-7 to DCS but it will have to wait after the Mirage. I'm so pumped for the Corsair I cannot even express it. I wish you the best with DCS development so we can see it as soon as possible. :) See here: https://www.facebook.com/RazbamSims?fref=nf

Thank you, that's what I was looking for.

Can we expect the stream again tomorrow?

Check their Facebook page. They mention from time to time in comments, that they are planing to have it in DCS. For example in todays comments.

So what improvements Will dcs world 2 have for CA? The question is not what/if, but when. :(

Wags will not be making an archive from the first stream so If someone else will not record it, then it will not be available for replay.

Does this also mean that there will have to be a pilot AI? Because if I will want to play as a RIO for a moment then someone will have to fly that thing for me... and probably good enough to continue in the dogfight I have entered. Will the pilot bitch on me for not targeting fast enough? :D

No Im not. I dont mind flying WW2 plane over Gruzia even though it does not fit in time and place nor do I mind flying F-14B in a campaign that could have been flown only by F-14A. The same goes for other airplane variants. What I was trying to point out is why would they bother with A in first place when they will be doing B for first release too. But if they would do the B strike capable right away then I would understand it quite easily. DCS community is used for UFOs all over the place because there is lack of theathers anyway.

A proper multiplayer campaign will still be limited by enemy aircrafts and available maps. You cannot simulate it to the exact point in past as you will never have ideal background for it. So my question still stands.

What I do not get is why would they develop A version when there will be the B version too. Why put work in a separate flight model when they can differenciate the versions a lot more than just with engine upgrades. From a marketing point a B version with strike capabilities would be a lot better than a B version with only upgraded engines. Then we get to the point where the A will be used only for campaign purposes as everybody else will use B in multiplayer.

That would be really shame to not have the Bombcat in for release. :( But if you can sell it as an upgrade later then I have no problem with that. :)

The manual would be my first choice if it would be available.

So basically you would buy a licence for being able to pick up hitchhikers? :) I want thinking about similar thing, but this is maybe a question for ED and not LS.