nickos86

Attached a screen shot of a MIG25 that was hit by a AIM120 and then hit some more by a gun. No wings, no nose cone an engine on fire and it was still flying for quick some time (with a missile under it's non-existing wing). Would be cool it that would be tuned, thanks!

No. It's not. There are too many drawbacks- The MFDs readability is bad, most of the systems - both avionics and weapons - are missing or incomplete. The module is still very much premature and there are many bugs. It would recommend to wait for it's status to get much better before spending money. Personally, I LOVE the F-16 and grabbed it right away as it was released just to get very disappointed and rarely fly it.

Hi, I find it very hard to read any on the numbers or even understand the symbols in the FCR/MFD pages. The fonts are tiny and without zooming in it nearly impossible to read the height of the bandit, the threat number in the middle of a threat circle etc. ED - Is that the real font size? should it be bigger? Thanks.

Oops. Fixed https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3803475&postcount=131 First post on page 14 in the Hornet Mini-Updates. Thanks.

Last year WAGS posted this https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3803475&postcount=131 no news since... ED - please give us some info regarding this.

As the great and powerful Khabib Nurmagomedov once said: "This is number one bullshit". It should be implemented better.

Last year WAGS posted this https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3803475&postcount=131 no news since... ED - please give us some info regarding this.

I've already opened two threads about it https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?p=4080564#post4080564 and https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?p=3666580#post3666580 seems like ED won't do anything about it. At least there is a nice walk around: https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3670348&postcount=31

Chizh and BIGNEWY - Thanks for the quick replay!

Any news regarding the AIM-120 improvements that were said to be released on January?

When I try to do a "pop-up" attack and loft JDAM/JSOW to a target located on a mountain - it mostly miss with odd behavior. JSOW C or JDAM will hit short (it's like they are not even aiming for the target but rather on a point located below the target. JSOW A will try to "terrain follow" to get to it's defined dispense height, fly over the target and won't even open. Is there a bug in the game? Am I doing something wrong?

I've got Track IR. Simply find it uncomfortable to use the X/Y axis. Hiding them don't seem like a big deal... It's an easy task.

Nineline/BIGNEWY - any chance that there will be an option to hide the ejection handles on the sides the same way as with the stick?

Thanks! If you'll ever have the time/power to do the changes - that would be great for simulating a more 2000+ scenario. The SA is a huge asset of the 4+ gen aircraft and a big advantage of the Hornet. And again - thanks for you time and effort!

Dude, A. SUPERB JOB!!! Thank you so much! Tons of fun! B. I do want to play it with 2000+ equipment. Can you provide an explanation regarding what need to be tweaked so that datalink would work? What lau file to change and how? Again - thank you for this effort! Hours of fun!

Hi, It actually might be a feature on the Russian planes as well... not sure. Can you add the EXP (or RAID... not sure what should be in the F-15) to the radar? It would greatly help in BVR. Moreover, although it a low fidelity aircraft - any chance to add small enhancements to the radar? The bullseye of the tracked target perhaps? Thanks!

"Captain Orso"'s principal point is super correct and I don't understand why ED don't do this easy, little adjustments... In comparison to the real world, we need to deal with bought HOTAS systems. There are plenty of them out there and each got it's issues. Why not make multiple options for this switched and dials? Make a master mode switch like in the F-16, make the antenna elevation to work as absolute axis (simply because there is no like F-18 dial in the THRUSTMASTER WARTHOG or any other system)... Make our life easier here... What's the big deal? Its a small and quick investment of time to add it...

Hi, It's already working on the F-16... Any chance it will be implemented on the 18? Thanks.

Second post: 2. An A10C attacking tanks - the target appear on the SA page and A-A radar the moment the AI commits BTW i've checked with F18 attacking a ship- and the it's the same issue. Every AG target that the AI will engage- will appear on SA page and A-A radar DL_SA_AG_tank.trk F18_A10C_on_tank.miz

Hi, Note that ground targets attacked by allied DL capable aircraft appear on the SA page and A-A radar. First post: 1. F/A-18 lot 20 on a SEAD assignment attacking an enemy radar site. The moment the AI is committed to the target- it appear on the SA page and A-A radar. I've attached screenshots, the miz file and a track. DL_SA_AG.trk F18C_no_AA.miz

try changing the chimney smoke density to 0

A guess - if you fly with one external tank on one wing and a bomb on the other. During the flight you put the wing tank to 'stop' to keep the weight balanced. After dropping the bomb, put the fuel tank to Override so that the fuel will be transferred to the internal tanks drying up the wing tank and retaining balance.

+1 Please at least make an option to hide them like the center stick. Thanks!

Hi, While the new cockpit is BEAUTIFUL and is a leap forward on many fronts, the old cockpit's FOV and layout had its advantages. Please add an option for those who prefer to fly with the old cockpit to choose it in the the SPECIAL tab. Thanks in advance!