DefaultFace

Of course it's seeing it. It becomes almost impossible to fly. 99.99999999999999999999% of the time you will never recover this but occasionally you can balance it with the rudder. Not easy though.

If the 150 hp it added are so insignificant then why do people lose their mind about an extra 200 for the Pony......

^^hehehe. :music_whistling: totally never had this conversation. I really struggle to understand what more people want with the spit. I find it very competitive. If you can't kill things in the spit you're doing something wrong.

A nice fighter sweep yesterday with: 9./JG 27 Diesel 9./JG 27 MAD 9./JG 27 DavidRed 9./JG 27 Knauf 9./JG 27 Pete Erlkoenig

So this happened again yesterday.... Don't think I ever posted the first one here so just for good measure:

After fighting with Spits at 8K yesterday I gotta say it didn't seem any more or less dangerous than usual.

But also yeah player bomber modules for the win! +1

eekz already has a mission with bombers. We tested it at the burning skies event last year. Was a fun mission but when I asked when he was going to add them to the regular mission he said he didn't want to till Normandy. Not sure about the altitude changing the balance too much but it'd certainly be interesting for a change.

Wouldn't be surprised if it ends up being handled the way Tonopah etc were handled in Nevada with it just being airfields now and then more detail later on.

I hope this means what we think it means. Very cool. Thanks Racoon!

My god. Solty please read the last line. There are a grand total of 0 people here saying that the Mustang shouldn't get it's fuel. ED already said they are doing it. Not once did I say that only allies complain. They complain about this issue alot more. Which is understandable. Also what do complaints about russian bias in Il2 have to do with this here?

The difference is admittedly close and probably has alot to do with who manages their rads/prop better but it is easily possible for a Mustang to drop the nose and move around a bit and drag a 109 all the way across the map, just outside of effective guns range. I agree 190's are cool. No not every thread. But I've seen it alot. Not always necessarily the same people but it gets brought up often. It's happened here, in the 109 section, in the Dora section, and in the Mustang section. Every time it devolves into rants about production numbers of the K4, someone saying the P-51H is awesome and that all 109 pilots are noobs and my charts are better than your charts bla bla bla. And no of course it's not just allied pilots.

Well I have but ok. Feel free to disagree with me on that. My main point is that the never ending complaints about German OP only serve to get people warning points and not towards anything that will change the sim. Edit: Also I don't know what you want ED to admit? They developed the models they promised to develop. Whether their not changing the planeset was a wise decision or not is quite obviously debateable as we do it here every day, but I really don't think you are ever gonna get them to comment on that... Even if they did come out and say that they feel it's lopsided, what then? Still doesn't mean they would develop anything else. I think alot of guys here would be the first to hop on the Hype train towards a G14 but that train ain't leavin any time soon....

I don't think anyone here is against having a 109G or a 190A/F/whatever the relevant variant here is. I don't think anyone is against giving the allies a Mk XIV, and as much as I'm pretty sure it will be a monster I would look forward to flying it and fighting against it. And I don't personally think that flying allied is that much harder than flying axis. Complaining that the K4 can run away from a spit is like if I were to complain about Mustangs running away from K4s. Yeah they can drop the nose and run away, and there's nothing I can do about it. It's cause that airplane is faster. If I wanna be able to catch him I ought to fly a Dora. Sure there were some questionable choices made. But saying the combat is horribly lopsided to the point where it's unplayable or not enjoyable is IMO not true. So having said that no one is against this idea..... Does every thread need to turn into a huge whingefest about axis are so Op, only noobs fly 109, my life is so much harder than yours etc etc? This stuff will never convince ED to make a G10/14/6/whatever your dream opponent is. Can't we maybe think about some way we could convince ED it's worth their time to make one? Or to try and convince some other dev that making it would be a good idea. Or the even more out there version... Scour the Internet for people who know what they're doing and put a team together. Either way it's not gonna happen anytime soon.

Don't the trucks at the end of the runway already do this when you radio for landing? Can't be that hard to implement per radio. Might be an idea for that new atc system sowing soon tm

That new Mustang will not stop people complaining about the K4.

Well it's because the pylon from the big bomb can't be jettisoned. I assume the signal from the weapon release switch defaults to the bomb rack and then goes to the wing stations if there is no rack there. Not sure if this is how it worked irl. Tbh would imagine it was a a switch set when loading the aircraft on the ground and therefore only one or the other could be used but like o said not sure.

Last time I tested it only works when using the 4x SC50 loadout. With the SC 250 (or 500? can't remember haven't flown in a few weeks) you cannot jettison the bomb rack, therefore you can't 'switch' over to the rockets.

40m is about 4 plane lengths... not really negligible... however as we already discovered the v0s seem to be correct anyway so..... @Little D good question.... ask ED. rel4y already has a bug report open on this. Linked somewhere in the first few pages of this thread i believe.

Ok interesting. Never seen the spit ai head straight down like that before.

Looks pretty decent to me :) that ai or players? Gunnery and spotting are both mostly practice so I wouldn't worry about it too much.

Nice flying! Your shooting looks pretty good to me ;)

Yeah I have pretty much never primed for as long as I've been flying the 109 and only ever once have I had a problem. And that was in a mission with extremely cold weather. I do remember though that a few patches ago the way the engine catches was changed. Just hold the handle until the prop really stops spinning, no matter how slow it looks. Often it'll catch at the very last minute. Also make sure you wait for the inertial starter to be spun up all the way. Pulling too early can also cause it not to start.

+1 :thumbup:

Not sure if I'm understanding you correclty but theoretically yes you can bind any joystick to any aircraft. If you have 2 joysticks plugged in you could theoretically completely bind both to both aircraft and switch on the fly if you really want to.