Jump to content

Flycat

Members
  • Posts

    344
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Flycat

  1. ADM-141, AN-167 ecm pod, expand chaff adapter, would we have pods and loads by these style ?
  2. I don't know the progress of this discussion, but after we have such many pfm level's module, why you guys still expect a module only have sfm for alpha now and afm for far away future, yes, I means that mirage. It just like someone buy a new high performance computer and ask others which system os should he install, the answer is windows 2000 is good as windowsXP. Why we have windows 7 even windows X for now and still use those old fashion one to play game? However I don't really know the FM level of our great Mig, it's only written efm(?).
  3. Sorry about pump up this thread. I think we should limit and focus on the scope of discussion, do not casual to expand the discussion, that will have a result on easy ways. So in order to except the effect of clickable cockpit and aircrafts between different generations, why not compare Flight modeling between FC3's aircraft? And I still confuse about different between every level of flight model, I read that Product Terms many times but could not catch the essence, who can give a clearly example to explain the different between SFM, AFM and PFM during the flight? The last question is what the flight level and system modeling for the module which produced by partner and 3rd partner? ED only list their owned product on that product terms, I thinks it's better to have a list about the realism level of FM and system for every module. Finally, PCFS is still simulator on computer, not the real aircraft, and I just hope much closer to real world, much better, and not everyone have chance to server for the nation and military for many reasons. (however this sentence is not the key point which need to be discussed, it's just my personal thinking, thanks.) Thanks for the guys could answer my questions at first. Have a nice day. (don't blame me plz)
  4. Chuck, thanks for your guide. It seems MiG-21 could launch kh-66 at air to air mode, set the radar mode as the sarh missile and select weapon pylon like the rocket, like your guide said, and it could let the grom seek the air target like the other sarh aam.
  5. thrustmaster warthog or vkb black mamba. everyone knows warthog is great. and mamba is always out of stock, you need to buy another throttle... vkb boys said they WILL product a throttle as good as mamba joystick, in order to form a complete set, but who knows when will released it? lol If they finish to build complete set and metal stick in the future, I will set one pair of it.
  6. >.> could they upgrade the f-14s external model with our new Lnsim one at first? every times I saw the f-14 ingame that was truly terrible.
  7. we have discussed about those pic for one year, but they just the normal pic, no more meaning.
  8. that's he said before... so one of unannouncement project is more complex than f-14, take less time and will be released earlier then it? I could not understand it well, and didn't catch the points. LOL
  9. welp, that's interesting, shall we start a new turn of guessing game?
  10. kkk, blahblah, pewpewpew well, thank you cobra.
  11. Flycat

    DCS: F-5E!

    :/ well, after reading above reply, there is lots of hints, I still think it's better to show some direct proof to tell us hey, tiger is coming. kkk So I should keep ears up and waiting the good news. Thanks guys.
  12. I just joke, don't be serious.
  13. :/ the last day of august.
  14. So is this the secondary one? The first guide I remembered it's mig-21. And thank you Chuck. O/ Your guide is much easy to understand and clear than official one. LOL
  15. Dude, try to ask the question: why the su-27s doesn't fit R-77 in DCSFC3, at FC3 subforum. I just try to quote the words from the ED team member, they said that's the rule of their project. Ruskkiy boys have been discussion about this question for hundred page on Rus subforum. And I need to recommended google translation Rus by Eng, That's really nice and correct. Welp, everyone have different thinks about what the simulator like is. It's better to declaration on another thread, and a little deep thinking for the consumers. And anyway, we still could edit the .lua to let F-15c have capability to fit aim-9x, in order to make a test squad team mod, however it's another story. PS: The last line of my post is always the joke, don't mind that, it's not important and just for fun to make the discussion not such serious, such as this line.
  16. Flycat

    DCS: F-5E!

    sorry for bump up. After 15 pages discussion, the icon in the video is just a eastern egg or trolling? Who can give a answer about F-5E module? Has it been confirmed or do we need to waiting until other project/component be finished?
  17. Yea, you are right, only BOS has that virtual snowblindness simulator. And BOM in the future... ///// And, there is another interesting aircraft - su-26 could list on, aerobatics and extreme sport (maybe training) is such good.
  18. It's just like the Su-27 capability with R-77. Su-27 in our FC3 is SU-27s type, the early type of su-27, not the Su-27sm or others, It could not fit out with R-77, so ED didn't give it. They explain that is the things about manufacturer and defense department, their work depends on the blue print and historical data, not the personal feelings (this question has been discussion on other thread at FC3 sub forum, you can find it). So let the studio finish their work base on their professionals without pressure from consumers. It's just a common fleet fighter squad, not the 603 test weapon squad or such other testing team in cartoons.
  19. this is the creepiest thread I've ever read on this sub forum. "I beg you give us xxx, just like kindergarten boys in WOT." the result of 120 capability in the history is that it could, but not, and it only suitable on latest version of tomcat in lab, ours now is 80s& early 90s series in common. they didn't use it on the common one, only in lab and has been cut down by dear Dick Cheney. even you can beg/ask the studio to develop F-21 superior tomcat or vg wing type of navy raptor which on blueprint, that's more fantastic and much more interesting than F-14s. LOL
  20. B's HUD is same as A+, A+ had changed it's HUD, then upgrade to D. So D's HUD is the same as B.
  21. infantry get skeleton, maybe they could be controled in the future. DCS: infantry LOL
  22. DCS: First Person Shooter DCS: Infantry Power DCS: Combine Paratrooper DCS: Ground Force kkkk
  23. aim-54 is good enough with 60kg tnt in it. it could explosive 4 airecraft at once, could 120 do it? XD
  24. welp, 4 days to sep. count down alarm. LOL well, just paste few pic that's all good enough. it's really boring on forum and waiting for the good news. have fun and fly safe. kkk
  25. DCS is a simulator, so we need thousands people to run well a carrier, LOL buy a new super server, dcs boys!
×
×
  • Create New...