Flycat

The Air Combat Evaluation (ACEVAL) and the Air Intercept Missile Evaluation (AIMVAL) : / I even don't know what is the meaning of this two words before your thread. LOL And you can search "f-14 progress report", and it seems have 7 part of it at least, but missing #2, #5 and #6. XD Thank you for share.

Best picture of this thread 10/10

su-27 and f-15 doesn't have the clickable cockpit like ka-50. ka-50 is full detail and the same modules as it are a-10, l-39, f-86, mig-15, mig-21, mi-8, uh-1 and 3 wwii bird. and some of aircraft in fc3 will upgraded flight model, cockpit texture and external model to detail and high level, just like f-15/su-27. fc3 is worth to have it.

Is this site for the dcs(when we have hornet in the future)? XD Well, it always said I didn't select runway, and let me return to plan page to change that. : /

It seems during this Russian support Syria airstirke, most of loadouts are unguided bomb... Some of them are FAB250, others are FAB500, there are 2 or 3 bomb on one rack, That's really horrible. Rus guys use less guided missile or bomb could save money, and for the terrorist or other armed organization with less air defense weapon, this way is enough for them. I saw the video from their channel on youtube, maybe they did't show more guided missile or bomb in the uploaded video.

Well, after reading all of these post, it's very useful to me, and costs me lots of time. :D And it really helps me get some more new understanding about r-27 and 120. 120 is not such scary and r-27 is underestimate by my mind. lol ============== Other thinking about the thread: And the ED said before is really helpful: the performance and capability of weapon is the R&D department(OKB/ company) and DoD's should take care about. Under this way, I think we need keep our mind on how to use the advantage of the weapon to defeat enemy('s disadvantage). If we're in another "game", just like the Sorcerer won't defeat a Berserker in melee combat(typical battle, a range witch with null armor and a melee warrior with medium armor, ; P), the witch should always keep away from hostile, and it's the Sorcerer's way to win the combat. There is no balance or always feeling comfortable during the real world combat, and there is no perfect weapon to defeat every enemy in the battle, every weapon have it's own way to use and win. So always focus on original "limitation" topic. Sorry to out topic. : (

I remember the old bezel studio said they will work on mig-23 after mig-21, however they had gone and now for LNsim. LOL If it's 23MLD, well, which could launch r-60, r-23/24, r-27 and r-73, a bigger and faster fishbed with powerful missile and VG wing. :O

Don't forget only the Persian boys have the ace of tomcat and one shoot with 4 kill record, US cat's had been destroy by the Excavator and only 4 air combat victory during service. Just like the ace of eagle is in Israel, XDDD

:/ DCS: MAZ-7910, DCS: Su-26 or DCS: Ekranoplans

The rocket engine doesn't work until the missile jump out of the tube by the gas generator, then use the attitude control engine to turn to the target direction. After that, the mine rocket engine will work and go on. It's called cold launch, the other type is hot launch, the missile use its own exhaust to leave the tube. Soviet VLMS likes to use cold launch, and nato (mostly is USA) VLMS likes to use hot launch, It's not correct for our SA-15, the fire will break the top armor, LOL Good point you have fond, dude. :P

I bought the MiG-21 on steam, and I try to de-activate it, but it said "Application deactivation is impossible. Your license does not allow the deactivation or the number of deactivations allowed by the license is exceeded. Contact the product publisher." I only install it on my personal only once, is it the same problem which is mentioned by the cobra? So should I delete the series key in REG? And de-activate it again?

Much better fps for now @medium level, looks awesome @high level, and if it's on runway or taixing, it won't lost lots of frame, but it costs more RAM than before.

ummmm, I'm downloading the client, thnx your working, and hurry up! dude!

They have uploaded the beta branch of client to the steam, just let it on open beta, I've deleted the old client for many days, come on dude.

Nah, dude, I think we should come back to the discussion how these two aircraft in combat. we only have these air suprerior aircraft in dcs now, no rafale, no viper or other, if it compare to these, it's no sense for dcs. Also it could compare with su-27 and f-15. However, many of our forumer have combat victory during the fight between mig-21 and f-15. :/ Finally, it's a realistic game. (I only saw the first and the second pages of these thread.

It's a recon pod for "F-14R" like rf-4 before. Maybe we could have in the future, but I don't really know how to use it in DCSw. I mean that it seems we don't need tactical information from it in the game, or if we have those information, what can I do with it in current element. :/ And in that site, the fans of cats list many interesting pods and weapons, such as alq-167, adm-141, and these two are also suit with early type of cats. However the ecm pod of mig-21 haven't fix well, so I should keep calm with adm-141, and hope we can have a interesting cheater for the SAM as the feature.

So it's another wishlist thread? I'm prefer on Kamov series dual rotor and I agree with Looney's word.

well, It's a new external model. Before he said we are working on this and it will released on somedays, I will keep calm.

Reply to Lt.snake: You can select do not upgrade your game on steam, that's easy on steam client, but maybe you could not play MP on others' server.

It seems like to discuss about giving the capability of 120 to f-14 again, you guys have type lots of words already, and that boring thread had been closed, why restarted?

After some module with high price and expectation, I think 40usd is a good price for now to me and it could get 2 free mission, hope it won't broken my high expectation.

To Buzzles: It's a little about Taxonomy and Rhetoric. I have read that product terms for many times, as they said EFM could be every FM, known as sfm/afm/pfm, used by the 3rd party studio. Under this explain, "external" just means "the FM used by 3rd party", and you know the antonym of external is internal, and for the dcs studios, that means ED and Belsimtek as well known. Under this way, "internal FM" that include SFM/AFM/PFM for every first party studio's module. Also for the EFM, it should include SFM/AFM/PFM for every 3rd party studios' module as the same way. So, if I ask the actually accuracy FM of 3rd partys' module, someone just give the answer "EFM", that means "I give the answer, but no meaning". Above all that, I said that EFM is just a sick, totally different with S/A/PFM, they are under different systematics.

just pay patient, last year ed said they will release dcs1.3 as wll known as dcs2 for now at Q4 2014. they delay it for a whole year. they always said everything is subject to change, so the calander is just a alphabet for them, for us? just wait. wait wait and until the day, they post the announcement for the new one, if they don't finish the project, whatever you tpye the words on the forum is totally useless, just let them done it. we just need wait the announcement and prepare the money, and also need a little more patient.

so ed set the EFM is just sick, we have the flight model but which level is it? It's EFM! wtf, EFM is？ Have no comment, no one will tell you, I try to get the answer, they just say EFM, so I only buy the pfm in the future. Just like you want to buy a car, you ask which engine does it have, they told to you it has the engine. If you ask them is it an L4 or V8 engine? They still told you, welp, it has a engine, which type of engine have no comment. That's all the feeling of EFM to me. Top secert of DCS.

Thanks for you guys reply the thread again with useful example for the detail of every FM. I can have a better detail explanation of it to my friends. And could I have the official announcement about the Flight &System level confirmed by ED for every module? I think the EFM is like "we have the flight model, but the detail of it have no comment", always make others confuse for it.