PL_Harpoon

Let's clear something out. While the title says "realistic" the OT states that the missile behaviour is illogical not wrong. So, instead of searching for documented evidence (which IMHO might be impossible for a system that's in active duty) let's find out if it really is illogical. First of all, we all agree that it totally makes sense for the missile to blow up if it cannot reach its target. I can think of only two reasons for that. 1. It doesn't have enough energy. In this case an arbitrary 6km limit would be stupid. 2. It doesn't receive guidance. In this case, if the radar can't effectively track the target above 6km it makes sense to blow up the missile. So, the most important question is: do we have any evidence that the Tor can track targets above 6km or not?

There are also easy and quick ways of distinguishing whether a target is detected by your radar or not. First of all, targets which aren't detected by your own radar have their symbol slightly smaller. Secondly, you can place the TDC over the target symbol. If additional data shows up (speed/altitude/shooting cue) you can lock it up. If not then your radar can't see it.

There may be a lot of reasons why the aircraft doesn't show up on your radar screen. The most obvious to me is that perhaps your radar isn't pointing at the target. Check your radar elevation first as this is the most common culprit.

Who would've known that so many would feel threatened by an option of easier refueling for those who need/want it... ... and if you're not threatened by it, why oppose it so strongly?

This might not be the correct procedure but this is what I do: Use the throttle to place the AOA brackets on the horizon and simultaneously use pitch to place the FPM on the AOA. Then slowly add trim to ease off the stick.

Also, how does the aircraft when taking off?

I think you derailed the topic a "little bit" here. :P

+1 I also think the kneeboard needs a lot more default pages. A mission page for example, with target data, TOT and detailed info about the waypoints would be great.

That is IMHO the only valid reason for not having this feature. Nevertheless, I think an "Easy AAR" is a good idea. First, if they're going to include it in MAC (which I'm 99% sure is on the same engine) than applying it to DCS shouldn't be that difficult. Second it would smooth out the learning curve for new players, possibly reducing their frustration and keeping them onboard for much longer. It allows AAR for those of us who are physically unable to do it. Apart from possibly taking resources from other features there is literally no other valid reason for not having it.

Well, judging by what saw yesterday (a WW2 server was among top 5 most populated servers with 30+ players) I'd say it's far from dead.

And obviously everyone has the same standards as you as to what a simulation is...

Actually a thought just occurred to me. I might be wrong but last time I heard ED is working on their new low-fidelity sim called Modern Air Combat. If so, then I'm sure they are already working on or perhaps already have an easy AAR mode. It's just a matter of implementing it into DCS when it's ready.

My take on the subject is that while I believe that free visual upgrade is in ED's best interest, if they decide that it was too much work and charge for it, I wouldn't hold it against them.

Since this thread is brought back from the dead... Does it break IC?

Wait, are you saying that you're entitled to free model upgrades for your modules?

What I can see is that he is just turning on everything. Anyway, this was not a serious post as I'm aware that MIDS/Link 16 isn't fully simulated.

Acutally, this is exactly what this pilot does. :D https://youtu.be/yeij-YX9MdY?t=625

I agree. 100% I didn't notice anyone demanding it though. If they decide to give us a free GFX update like with previous models I'd be very happy. If they decide to upgrade the Mi-8 to the modern standards and charge money for it - I'd be happy too. And I'll gladly pay.

Send us a track file or a video. I've just done that myself yesterday and it worked without any issues.

Yeah, judging by the upcoming release of MSFS 2020 I too would bet on the civ gear. Which is fine for me cause just recently I've bought a new Warthog setup and would be sad to be just a few weeks too early with my purchase ;)

I like this idea as you could also make slider that would change the "strength" of that tractor beam. Just like the take-off assist for warbirds. That way one could learn AAR without the frustration by slowly reducing the assist as they get better at it.

Points 1, 2, 4, 5 - totally with you. Point 3 - ok, but only with labels on. Point 6 - Would be great to have (perhaps available on the rearm/refuel page) but to be honest I already got used to fixed convergence (I mainly fly the Spitfire). Point 7 - I don't remember how it works right now, but I think that you can select your own presets on the rearm window. If so, then I'd rather choose them each time I start than automatically start with my previous loadout. If not then I'd like the option to select my own presets (that could include liveries).

There are many options, for ex. something like a rudder assist, that would dampen your inputs or perform small adjustments. You'd still feel like it's you doing the job and could "brake" the assist by rapid movements (sort of like braking the autopilot in the Hornet).

Just a quick example off the top of my head: Let's say you enjoy DCS but you only have a low-end stick and you can only play for several hours on weekends. You're also a member of a squad and they've set up a cool mission with AAR. Now, without easy AAR you're excluded from the flight. It's a lose-lose situation: you lose because you can't enjoy the mission, your squad loses because they have 1 less person to fly with. Literally no one benefits from not having such a feature.

Wow. The sheer amount of smugness and arrogance in this thread is staggering. Just because you've spent hours practicing AAR and spent life savings on the best hardware on the market doesn't mean everyone has to do it. After all, DSC is a hobby at best, not an exam to get you into the actual Air Force. Just for the record, I always play on max realism and have learned AAR on every plane I own.