MiG21bisFishbedL

Yes, they've absolutely forgotten you. 100% totally forgotten you. Not because 2.8 has issues to iron out, like the Viper's RWR and VR performance. Nope, you've been forgotten, for sure!

Couple this with the asking price of a DCS module and one will see why we don't just slap together a two-seater. ED has standards it needs to maintain.

I'd love it. High-risk missions, penetrating air defense networks, dropping a pair right on target? Sure, it's one mission, but it's a capability unrealized in DCS in this manner.

Okay, guys, build walls around my base. I've got 4 monasteries. I'm going to concentrate on upgrading and making an army of monks.

F's in the chat for @dcsil2pilot he is bringing it home for us. ;_;7

You aren't thinking forward enough. After all, there's even a Jet Cri-Cri!

A beta tester said it, thus COLOMBAN MC-15 CRI-CRI CONFIRMED FOR DCS WORLD

Squawk codes would be much more useful if we had a player controlled ATC of some variety.

Oh I'm totally with you. I'd like to see them brought up to a standard that's not old enough to drink.

Vietnam will require some whiz-bang programming to get it to be decent in the current tech. Can ED do it? Totally, but let's be real: We need the Cricri.

One may have an urge to say it's out of the question, but with the coming Eurofighter, it could mean that the German MoD might be willing to play ball on this kind of thing.

You ain't wrong, buddy! Watch them drop it at like 11:45PM, December 31st just to spite me. "WE KEPT OUR PROMISE, MIG, YOU WERE WRONG. HOW DOES IT FEEL TO BE WRONG, MORON?" -Cobra, probably.

MC-15 Cricri. This year is the year.

Yes, that much is obvious. But, in ED's case, governments are clumsy things at the best of times, so a good third party is needed here. I would think so, too. The Tu-95 is absolutely tragic.

Still expecting 2023.

It was a joke. There aren't any apparent plans for future MiG-21 variants at this time that are publicly known.

And, once more, there could be aspects about even those fighters that are classified to this day. The USSR was famously paranoid and this kind of stuff can get lost in oceans of paperwork. They don't have an expiration date, unfortunately. Sucks, but that's how it is. At least, for ED's side of the equation. They've made it clear that 3rd parties might be much more able. If only it were that simple.

Thank you, very cool.

Exactly!

Even if there were, we'd be looking at something years out. Many years out.

The Fulcrum is a Cold War aircraft. We can't simply judge the availability of information based on the era in which an aircraft served. For many governments and defense groups, classification doesn't have an expiration date. Meaning, there are aspects of aircraft out of service right now and have been out of service for decades that could still be classified simply because that paperwork is lost in an ocean of folders and filing cabinets. ED received a similar answer about the MiG-23 years ago. RAZBAM, however, is not subject to Russian law. That's the important part. The people running these organizations have one job and catering to us nerds is not part of it, sadly. Realistically, all that can be done is inquire.

The 29 is on indefinite hold.

Some do. HB did for the F-14.

It's MAJESTIC.