Prophet

:megalol: Speaking of mirrors, I notice in Su25T left and right mirror dont have the same rotation to em.

A clickable 3D cockpit, AFM, and system modelling that goes beyond any other sim out there. 2 years is fast.

Depends on what is considered a bug and what is just not modelled fully. I know of very few actual bugs on LOMAC.

Thats pretty much it. If you dont have the $, but want a better stick than the X45/X52, then go CH. If my wife knew how much I spen on the NXT/Hall sensors, she would probably beat me with the broom. P.S. thanks for the link Blaze

Thats what i meant by " Maybe we can show the new feat of tanks........ ya know what I mean GG, :D"

If you bought the download, you have to login to the main page. Log in here; http://www.lockon.co.uk/ Then go to; http://lockon.co.uk/index.php?end_pos=135&scr=products&lang=en And you should see the key. Now if you ran out of activations like I did, they e-mail you a new one, and it doesnt show up there.

Yes but 1 chopper into an older code. The next project is probably going to be re-worked a bit to make it easier. Its been talked about before the short comings and limitations of this code base, so I am sure they will be working hard to improve that aspect. And IMO, a lot of people said the same thing about the 25T, "oh I will never fly that thing", and then they actually do, and find they like it a lot. I think the KA-50 will be like that. There will be some that wont want to fly it at all, but I think a lot that are apprehensive, once they do, they will like it.

Well they are starting from scratch, so kinda have a bit more flexability. I am sure EDs next project will be much stronger than LOMAC is.

If you got the Area51 membership, the new dev diary is a great read.

Where did you get them from, I will need a set once my sensors get here. Got the NXT sitting on my desk tho. P.S. Megapixel only effects the size of the picture, and correspondingly the image quality if you zoom in. A 4M pixel camera is good for an 8x11 picture IIRC.

Ah yes, the Su25 vanilla is quite old school. I know of no way besides knowing the flight plan ahead of time, and like you have said referencing distance given.

very nice

Again? you say it as if you had before.

The increase of usage had nothing to do with this thread, this thread is a result in the increase and endorsement of its use.

you kill me. its fun to think you have some bright idea on how it can be fixed. yup, just more blah blah from you, trying to keep the arguement going. First you try and compare RL radar and ECM, now you want to say its a simulator so we should approximate, guess what, thats what ED did. If you only know the basics, why you trying to bring up pulse rates, ecm pulse length. Yes its a simulator, and a consumer 'game' at that. Want to venture to guess how much simulators cost that do what you suggest? Talk with Agilent, and maybe if you win the PowerBall you can share your purchase with us all, but I doubt that would cover the cost unless its a real big pot. Like I said, the ECM and radar model is the way it is for many reason, one among them is the complexity and time it takes to model. And everything you suggest is far far beyond that scope. And its funny when you cant really debate a valid complaint, you have to call it crying, or whining, sure sign you have nothing else to add worth reading.

And re-write the LOMAC engine while you are at it. Great idea :megalol: . Hope you have a few years to wait on that.

Interpret however you want. And I dont need to tell you when and what I post in the beta forums, defeats the purpose no? And see the problem is we are only simulating. You are trying to give me this nano-second pulse this, and blah blah blah. All things that dont really mean anything to the current, or even proposed fixes, to the ECM model. Its great you know all teh math behind it, but it doesnt amount to much considering it cant be implemented that way in the current LOMAC engine. Why do you think its as simple as it already is. I tried telling you this, but you insist, once again on thinking somehow its relevent. Whatever, enjoy repeating yourself.

Thats a pretty sweet pic.

From what I have read, its not the SLI support that is such a problem with the 680i, but the RAID data corruption. That was the biggest reason I stayed away from it. Normally I love nVidia chipsets, and have used them exclusively since the came out. But I use RAID, and so having corruption was not acceptable at all.

Or didnt you know that I already knew the model was flawed? And that we have known that since day 1 really. And I posted a thread in the beta forums before this one was started. Not sure where you got the notion I had no interest in seeing the problem fixed. I wouldnt be posting here if I didnt.

:thumbup:

Maybe we can show the new feat of tanks........ ya know what I mean GG, :D

@ Brewer - Well I did have a long winded response, but I will just leave it at this. Testers shouldnt be fanboys. It doesnt serve anyone. And just because I will not be supportive in this issue, because it completely ruins the online A2A experience, doesnt mean I havent been supportive of everything else. Maybe you should read more of what I have written. And I pointed out his 'kudos' because they are just as relevant as me being a beta tester. You only point it out in some childish attempt to see me reprimanded by ED :thumbup: Oh, and there is a difference between policing, and endorsing.

Your subject title is a bit misleading. You arent really paying fans, not in the sense that you have already paid for something and are not getting it. Not sure why so many people think ED owes them an explanation. You people should realize that when ED gets BS out, they get paid. The way I see it, you owe them to wait.

It will be faster, but more expensive. 8800's will come down in price, and they will release the 8900.