IronJockel

They do attack low lvl fighters. However with no effect at all. The AI's slaughtered the the flak 36.

I tried them at 5000 meter with 300 kph, 4 flak guns, 16 bombers and 4 bombers died before reaching the bombing target and one more when leaving. I will try it again at different settings today. Did anybody already check if the 88 fires at low flying fighters?

on the other hand the 88s take out a B17 formation with results so impressive that Berlin would probably never burned, if the RL counterparts would have similar results. Over all all flak guns seems way to accurate to me.

The Infantry looks neat. Didn't expect them to be this detailed.

Bug should be fixed.

Alpenwolf's update is up and i (hopefully) got rid of the views restrictions.

So people that can afford a gaming PC capable of running DCS don't have the extra 40 bucks for the map with units?? Besides ED released an entire sim with a map and tons of AI and 2 planes to fly yourself for FREE. I don't know how you want ED to pay their bills and who knows how ED worked on the tech for the new map, the map itself and the units without gaining a single penny for these products. It maybe expensive but all modules are worth the price. I certainly never felt like being ripped off by ed. Something i can't say about every flight sim dev.

Server will stay on stable. I'm continuing work on a Nevada version which I will set up as soon as I'm done.

I'm guessing blocking bugs like clipping trough the map, stuff disappearing from different angels, performance problems and so on. The usual reasons.

The Idea of the EWR for the RU side was that this way is the more common approach (as far my limited knowledge, forgive me if i'm wrong) for the Russians to detected enemy aircraft's. But as the the EWR got destroyed so many times leaving the entire situations one sides i decided to make them have a AWCS that re spawns for balancing reasons. As for banning: Don't hesitate to report violation of the rather simple rules i've set up. We can and will ban people, if we get evidence (TACVIEW etc.) of violation. Just report it.

Server Now includes the Viggen. Ships should now respawn.

Alpenwolf helped me update the mission. Here are the alterations: -No more ground EWR on RU side. Instead 2 Awacs one for mig15 and one for mig21 are cycling the airfield. -both Korea planes moved to airfields closer to the bulls eye. -Ships as on both sides added. Currently without re spawn function. I will change this as soon as the Viggen is on stable release. I hope you enjoy and thanks to Alpenwolf for his help! He offered to help me more with alterations, what is very appreciated.

Sorry guy's i'm currently studying for exams, so my time is limited for now. However i am working on something the nevada guys will surly love ;) I will add the Viggen as soon as it is part of the stable version. If it is already i will add it as soon as i can.

Please don't say that, we waited enough :music_whistling:

The Jagtpanther and Panzer 4 are missing parts of their side skirts! Will we be able to blow them off? :thumbsup:

Even if it's low poly, it will probably be the most detailed 3d version of south England we had so far in a video game^^ Gesendet von meinem GT-I8200N mit Tapatalk

I never said i am against the addition of higher boost settings. Actually i am in favour of it. Every possible additional variation of an aircraft is a good thing. Hostility also wasn't my intention. All i did was to point out that this particular test noted a mechanical fatal failure. (How dare I??) The reason for why he used the paper was edited in after i got accused of being a troll, instead of before.

I got my answers from Solty already. Nobody forced you to "waste time" on anything. If you consider he Mk9 backward i wonder why not the K4 aswell. Both are not great in high speed manoeuvring in an environment where high speed surprise attacks became the norm and slow turning fights in the vertical or horizontal the exception. Both are planes from the 30s on steroids.

Guess all you want. :lol:

Why didn't you use a more representative paper then, if the content of this one is irrelevant? According to Solty, these exist. They faced the La-9 over Korea, the top notch Russian prop plane of that time. How dare i to assume that it would be logical for the US Airforce to equip their pilots only with their best aircraft. :music_whistling:

All of the WW2 in that list have been spotted by the screen shots.

So the paper is a valid source to prove an increase in performance but it's not valid to prove a possible reliability issue that comes with it and since all engines can fail it doesn't matter anyway?

Doesn't really matter on what setting these engines can run with post war cooling systems. Nobody sad they can't handle it. However, according to that paper the higher setting came with a price and this should not be ignored. And everybody can get cancer. What's the point?

http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.org/mustang/AL_963.pdf I wonder, if anbody of the +23 fraction has read page 4 of that paper. "...... some severe handling tests to check rapid opening up and acceleration, an internal mechanical failure of the pump occurred, ......." It isn't all sunshine with higher boost settings. And about the P51 H thing: If it was so great, why didn't it replace the D even after the war????

I added Simple Radio to the Server.