Teknetinium

I will show you the difference;) Can you explain what is going on here Chiz? This kind of things are not unusual but actually the opposite!

I would not blame ED for not making Su-27SM or anything Russian. American laws that stepped in around 2014 made it difficult, Im sure Russians have replied with thire own response to American sanctions as well. But that dose not mean that we should not give as much attention to all missiles that are used in DCS.

The difference should be there and no one is saying anything different, its just that ER-27 go for chaff, or for something unexplainable many of the times compared to Aim-120. Im totally fine if Aim-120 is at 70% and ER-27 at 30%. Chiz I know for a fact that ER-27 have became worse 3 years a go, ask anyone. Servers were using R-77 on flankers because people thought it was a bug. Then time went with no explanation and people accepted it while aim-120 was as effective. Then people have to prove that there is a bug for three years and then we have to wait for it to get fixed for two. We fly against one another in MP as tournaments and matches and would like weapons to be bug free first! I will show on track for you all the difference between how Er-27 eat chaff or what ever compare to aim-120 from 10KM.

I will show you what I mean, 70% is clinical test from no escape zone in MP.

I have data on more then 1000 missiles fired. Just sending a proximate. This data is public. i will send some tracks soon

Chiz If you want 51PVO/100KIAP can start supporting you with data from matches on missiles performance. Tracks and % per missile. Cant share those tracks in public.

If Aim-120B 60%, Aim-120C 80%, ER-27 30% in MP would be perfect. As it is now Aim-120 is around 60% while ER-27 15% in MP.

Max, you can fly what ever you like but I would like products that are in DCS to work as close as possible to RL. At the moment ER-27 Family have been bugged for over 3 years and need some attention. Let me assure you that Flanker is more realistic then F-16/F18/F-14 when it regards air to air.

Missiles need to work in MP and tested there Player vs Player!!! It is pointless to talk about numbers and data vs AI, as Datalink for Flankers only with AI! Blinking jammer to the left, Blinking jammer to the right, NATOfanboys start to cry, Now same people dont want it. What is realistic Chis? Or was the 15sec warm up just a balance thing so fanboys TWS could work? It is pointless to send track or wright reports to ED, have done it not once but for years as 51PVO/100KIAP with no results. This is a combats simulator A2A/A2G weapons should be priority to work, Not waiting for a bug to get fixed regarding missiles for over 3 years. Regarding all platforms and not only the ones that are flown the most, I pay for them all! My question is why ED dont make Su-27S? Even if Russian companies/organizations are sanctioned by the States you should be able to make the S model to go around the risk.

So funny to watch the double standards! Would be good if ED fix3ed bugs that are over 4 years old as well!! I acctully paid for that product to get supported!!!

LOL; Jamming BLINKING BIAS, NOW we should remove it remove 34 sec magic INS as well . A video to ED https://youtu.be/yRKfovi_KMY

15% is a fake? Show me data that its not in DCS. Thats the only thing I told you with data supported with 1000s of missiles fired. If you believe that ER-familly should have 15% hit rate then it fine by me:) Dont tell me who is fake because you just dont have the numbers in DCS or in RL. Not my intention to sound rude but after three years you start yelling...

LOL Chiz I leave this forums, look up your own fact before calling fake R-37M is nice developed 1986? I think Su-35 or Russian Su-30SM3 would have even more F-15 kills then MKI.

Yemen 2xR-27T fire 1 hit 50%.

Pointless!!! DCS missiles are not even close to RL so ED could just change any parameter to get the % up!

Im not talking about balance, dont put words in my mouth, Im talking about that ER-27 should be around 30% and not 15% hit rate. I have data that proves 15% case. Who talk about balance? Making ER-27 hit 30% will just make DCS more realistic. At the moment it is a Vietnam standard on ER-27/ET. Im not here to teach you anything, Im here to talk about DCS compare to real life!

I dont know what to tell you more that this broken missiles for more then 3 years now!!! Vietnam standard for 3 years

Talking in circles with no result, still 15% for more then 3 years! Just make a fix. Just for you knowledge, people stopped flying Flanker because of there is no attention to missiles for years, not that it missing clickable buttons!!!

Another topic we should not talk about it here. Very easy to replicate, fly faster then 1300km/h below 6000meters and pull the stick gently, the lower you get the worse it gets. G limiter should not allow you to break the plane!

Some pilots have better some less, but we will land around 15% if you look over all.

.

I hope so, It just ridicules that supported data that is very easy to get is declined and with that claiming that the ER family should be this bad for years

Im sure you know more then me but you dont use Er-27 in DCS MP as much as me and I dont think you know how bad the ER/ET are. I think we all agree that ER-27 should hit more then 15%. Its not my job to know how you fix it, I think we booth could agree on that ER-27 should be around 30%. Efter 1000 missiles fired in a MP arena you can make the judgment of the missiles performance. At this point we are over that