-
Posts
2068 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
4
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Teknetinium
-
Why would a MIG-29 be possible to make but not Su-27S model witch would be able to fight with modern fighters thx to its DL, stronger EOS, Stronger radar and Jammers.
-
We would violet the rule that AIM-120 should be like laser beam not effected by Jammers or ground clutter.
-
In the picture I show ER-27/ET look different on several parts compering to older pics.
-
Only in EDs world, Su-35 use new R-77-1, updated ER-27/ET and R-37 A2A. I know that Russians/Ukrainians call their ER/ET-27-1 now but I dont know what 1 stay for. Regarding R-77 it is a new version. Could as well stay for export. https://www.artem.ua/index.php/en/products/special-products/air-to-air-missiles-r-27
-
All can blink but not Flanker! Typical ED bias approach! 15 sec was implemented so F-15 could take TWS shot, it was done for pure balancing. As you noticed ED do balancing only for Blue regarding jammers or SD-10. It is a shame by ED end the answer why no one fly Flankers, Its thx to ED nothing else. If ED showed no BIAS community would feel better.
-
reported AIM-120C losing targets easily for chaff even at close ranges
Teknetinium replied to Comrade Doge's topic in Weapon Bugs
Sounds about right. -
I think the cold war could be simulated better now then modern arena. - F-14A/A-7/A-6/MIG-29A/MIG-23/Su-22/F-5/MIG-21/AJS-37 - UH-1/SA-342/Mi-24/Mi-8 - Iraq Iran war Iraq: Mig-29A/Mig-23/Su-22/Mi-8/Mi-24 Iran: F-14A/F-5/UH-1/SA-342 - Falklands Argentina: AJS-37/Mi-8/F-86 United Kingdom: AV-8(limited weapons)/UH-1
-
OOOOOOF
-
Has Deka decided yet? What's their next module?
Teknetinium replied to J-20's topic in Deka Ironwork Simulations
I could even pre order it since Deka and HB released almost complete model compare to some other developers. -
Then some ask why so many feel ED has BIAS approach.
-
Regarding Su-27/F15/F-16/16/18/14 there is no intel how effective jammers would be. I understand what you mean but that difference should seen between MIG-21/23vsF-16/18 or similar situations.
-
Has Deka decided yet? What's their next module?
Teknetinium replied to J-20's topic in Deka Ironwork Simulations
Deka plz save ED -
ED dont balance! Only when it regards Nato! 7.99$ for no blinking jammers would be great! Could we get explanation why 15 sec warm up was implemented in first place, realism or balance?
-
Has Deka decided yet? What's their next module?
Teknetinium replied to J-20's topic in Deka Ironwork Simulations
As much as I was for the idea that ED should have control over all weapons Im changing my opinion because we who fly anything els that use aim-120 have to wait for over 3 years to get heard, still waiting! And why would some of the companies give data to ED they got from actual developers. Best wishes Deka, if you would get a green light for a Su-30MKK I will offer my services as 3d modeler or anything else you need as videos, testing, or what ever you need help with. Our team have very dedicated and competent people. -
Has Deka decided yet? What's their next module?
Teknetinium replied to J-20's topic in Deka Ironwork Simulations
Is the Su-30MK2s not a updated Su-30MKK? As J-11A was updated to J-11B? -
need track replay Russian ECM not working.
Teknetinium replied to Sol 1 Mihaly's topic in DCS: Flaming Cliffs
It was lobbied by those who flew F-15s back then in order to stop the blinking that broke the TWS lock. I just want to hear the realism behind it now when we have blinking to the left and right. -
need track replay Russian ECM not working.
Teknetinium replied to Sol 1 Mihaly's topic in DCS: Flaming Cliffs
Chiz/BIGNEWY can you tell me why 15sec jammer warm up was implemented on Flanker? Cmptohocah, Taxdollaratwork spot on on the bias approach by ED! The community might look bigger and you might get more profit but in reality A2A has become less realistic and fun if you ask me. BMS 2.0, 30Gs with tanks and magic INS where F-16/18 have more play time then Flanker regarding fuel But hey ED had time to add inverted lock loss below 1500m on Flanker to make it more realistic Dont forget the hud repeater for MIG-29 and and DL for Flanker with AI I did get all EDs models in order to support ED with updates. I have to stop and get only what I fly for obvious reasons. -
Has Deka decided yet? What's their next module?
Teknetinium replied to J-20's topic in Deka Ironwork Simulations
Can Su-30MKK use SD-10? I think Deka will be done with Su-30 faster then ED updating the ER-Family -
The relevance is in that I have been saying before that 15 sec was implemented that it was only bias balancing reason and had nothing to do with RL. As so many other bugs regarding missiles/jamming jammers should effect all typs of radars including aim-120s in a defensive way. At them moment the jammer in Flanker have no purpose .
-
Has Deka decided yet? What's their next module?
Teknetinium replied to J-20's topic in Deka Ironwork Simulations
Even a J11A/B would do as good.