Jump to content

Teknetinium

Members
  • Posts

    2068
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by Teknetinium

  1. Why would a MIG-29 be possible to make but not Su-27S model witch would be able to fight with modern fighters thx to its DL, stronger EOS, Stronger radar and Jammers.
  2. We would violet the rule that AIM-120 should be like laser beam not effected by Jammers or ground clutter.
  3. In the picture I show ER-27/ET look different on several parts compering to older pics.
  4. Only in EDs world, Su-35 use new R-77-1, updated ER-27/ET and R-37 A2A. I know that Russians/Ukrainians call their ER/ET-27-1 now but I dont know what 1 stay for. Regarding R-77 it is a new version. Could as well stay for export. https://www.artem.ua/index.php/en/products/special-products/air-to-air-missiles-r-27
  5. All can blink but not Flanker! Typical ED bias approach! 15 sec was implemented so F-15 could take TWS shot, it was done for pure balancing. As you noticed ED do balancing only for Blue regarding jammers or SD-10. It is a shame by ED end the answer why no one fly Flankers, Its thx to ED nothing else. If ED showed no BIAS community would feel better.
  6. I think the cold war could be simulated better now then modern arena. - F-14A/A-7/A-6/MIG-29A/MIG-23/Su-22/F-5/MIG-21/AJS-37 - UH-1/SA-342/Mi-24/Mi-8 - Iraq Iran war Iraq: Mig-29A/Mig-23/Su-22/Mi-8/Mi-24 Iran: F-14A/F-5/UH-1/SA-342 - Falklands Argentina: AJS-37/Mi-8/F-86 United Kingdom: AV-8(limited weapons)/UH-1
  7. I really hope ED look in to F-18/F-16 fly longer distance then F15/Flanker since F-18 came out witch should be only possible in DCS WORLD.
  8. I could even pre order it since Deka and HB released almost complete model compare to some other developers.
  9. Then some ask why so many feel ED has BIAS approach.
  10. Regarding Su-27/F15/F-16/16/18/14 there is no intel how effective jammers would be. I understand what you mean but that difference should seen between MIG-21/23vsF-16/18 or similar situations.
  11. ED dont balance! Only when it regards Nato! 7.99$ for no blinking jammers would be great! Could we get explanation why 15 sec warm up was implemented in first place, realism or balance?
  12. I think it works as intended, Chaff and jammers should mess up the missile to some extent. In DCS that has not been the case at all regarding active missiles.
  13. As much as I was for the idea that ED should have control over all weapons Im changing my opinion because we who fly anything els that use aim-120 have to wait for over 3 years to get heard, still waiting! And why would some of the companies give data to ED they got from actual developers. Best wishes Deka, if you would get a green light for a Su-30MKK I will offer my services as 3d modeler or anything else you need as videos, testing, or what ever you need help with. Our team have very dedicated and competent people.
  14. Is the Su-30MK2s not a updated Su-30MKK? As J-11A was updated to J-11B?
  15. It was lobbied by those who flew F-15s back then in order to stop the blinking that broke the TWS lock. I just want to hear the realism behind it now when we have blinking to the left and right.
  16. Chiz/BIGNEWY can you tell me why 15sec jammer warm up was implemented on Flanker? Cmptohocah, Taxdollaratwork spot on on the bias approach by ED! The community might look bigger and you might get more profit but in reality A2A has become less realistic and fun if you ask me. BMS 2.0, 30Gs with tanks and magic INS where F-16/18 have more play time then Flanker regarding fuel But hey ED had time to add inverted lock loss below 1500m on Flanker to make it more realistic Dont forget the hud repeater for MIG-29 and and DL for Flanker with AI I did get all EDs models in order to support ED with updates. I have to stop and get only what I fly for obvious reasons.
  17. Can Su-30MKK use SD-10? I think Deka will be done with Su-30 faster then ED updating the ER-Family
  18. The relevance is in that I have been saying before that 15 sec was implemented that it was only bias balancing reason and had nothing to do with RL. As so many other bugs regarding missiles/jamming jammers should effect all typs of radars including aim-120s in a defensive way. At them moment the jammer in Flanker have no purpose .
  19. Even a J11A/B would do as good.
×
×
  • Create New...