Teknetinium

Then some ask why so many feel ED has BIAS approach.

Regarding Su-27/F15/F-16/16/18/14 there is no intel how effective jammers would be. I understand what you mean but that difference should seen between MIG-21/23vsF-16/18 or similar situations.

Deka plz save ED

ED dont balance! Only when it regards Nato! 7.99$ for no blinking jammers would be great! Could we get explanation why 15 sec warm up was implemented in first place, realism or balance?

F-4 in Vietnam did better or MIG-23

ER-family is effected by jammers and chaff already.

I think it works as intended, Chaff and jammers should mess up the missile to some extent. In DCS that has not been the case at all regarding active missiles.

As much as I was for the idea that ED should have control over all weapons Im changing my opinion because we who fly anything els that use aim-120 have to wait for over 3 years to get heard, still waiting! And why would some of the companies give data to ED they got from actual developers. Best wishes Deka, if you would get a green light for a Su-30MKK I will offer my services as 3d modeler or anything else you need as videos, testing, or what ever you need help with. Our team have very dedicated and competent people.

Is the Su-30MK2s not a updated Su-30MKK? As J-11A was updated to J-11B?

It was lobbied by those who flew F-15s back then in order to stop the blinking that broke the TWS lock. I just want to hear the realism behind it now when we have blinking to the left and right.

Chiz/BIGNEWY can you tell me why 15sec jammer warm up was implemented on Flanker? Cmptohocah, Taxdollaratwork spot on on the bias approach by ED! The community might look bigger and you might get more profit but in reality A2A has become less realistic and fun if you ask me. BMS 2.0, 30Gs with tanks and magic INS where F-16/18 have more play time then Flanker regarding fuel But hey ED had time to add inverted lock loss below 1500m on Flanker to make it more realistic Dont forget the hud repeater for MIG-29 and and DL for Flanker with AI I did get all EDs models in order to support ED with updates. I have to stop and get only what I fly for obvious reasons.

Can Su-30MKK use SD-10? I think Deka will be done with Su-30 faster then ED updating the ER-Family

The relevance is in that I have been saying before that 15 sec was implemented that it was only bias balancing reason and had nothing to do with RL. As so many other bugs regarding missiles/jamming jammers should effect all typs of radars including aim-120s in a defensive way. At them moment the jammer in Flanker have no purpose .

Even a J11A/B would do as good.

Su-30 No bullshit plz!!! All of them are fine but I would say the biggest profit would be in Su-30.

Same argument was used to implement the 15 sec warm up so you could make home on jam or having TWS working. Now you want to remove 15 sec There is ways to break the home on jam as the F-14 by blinking in DCS or other measures in RL. Just because you advertising paper say aim-120 can go around jamming dont mean that it dose it in RL or DCS. When flares were tested, Same outcome for Russians as Americans, testing own flares did not help the seeker in RL situation because the opponent was using other type of flares witch made the opponents flares better then expected. I would assume same pattern fallow other countermeasures.

Show me one example or prove that aim-120 can hit a target home on jam, it is EDs world and workaround, home on jam is like homing on targets that don’t exist. Only in DCS Aim-120 hit a target home on jam

What could you expect from GG, Jammers should help GGs AIM-120 to hit the target not the opposite. I dont know where you get all your intel regarding jammers . I bet its from advertising TV-shop brushers of F-16/F-18/F-15.

51PVO/100KIAP have sent reports as well for 13 years, dont make of your self some sort of hero when it’s obvious what you are:) All good let the Flanker break the TWS as the F-14 dose. Im just pointing out how funny it is to watch you talk depending who it effects MP community is hunting exploiters thats how far we are in to DCS BVR code! the competitive modes are exchanged finding who is exploiting a rolle or 32sec magic INS or pulling 30Gs with tanks, list is long, Great work with your reports

I dont see any solution from you! I see only bias talk that suits you! You are welcome!

ED agree now when it affects Nato fanboy toys the Same way. That is Bias approach and very low by ED as many other things I will not mention here. just a reminder, people dont fly Flankers because it has only been improving to more realism . But when same realism reach Nato toys F-15 and F-18 make 30G with tanks

I dont paint, I see the hypocrisy and pointing it out.

Funny, you were the one that wanted 15 sec warm up and was for it when your TWS was effected in F-15, Why do you want to remove it now? What has changed regarding this topic? Why is the 15 sec not good anymore? 51PVO/100KIAP were saying from the start that 15 sec was just implemented for balancing a bias approach! Some things are fine to balance until it dont suit you. Dont worry I will point out double standards. I know you love me for that:) YES, plz remove it so we can blink to the left and right make Nato fanboys cry . ´With that goes all your credibility regarding realism with bias approach Would like a reply from ED regarding this topic as well!

Totally agree Fox! Its sad that ED don’t understand that we fly in MP as matches and tournaments and all missiles that are used in DCS need to be to date around same time. You are braking the community more the you think by this BIAS approach. With that fallows costumers. Its funny if you dont remember Chiz when I told you that ED should have control over missile performance. Back then you told me its up to each developer. I replied by telling this will become a good borch and got band. Look at us now Plz take my concerns with some afterthought.