Teknetinium

Su-30 No bullshit plz!!! All of them are fine but I would say the biggest profit would be in Su-30.

Same argument was used to implement the 15 sec warm up so you could make home on jam or having TWS working. Now you want to remove 15 sec There is ways to break the home on jam as the F-14 by blinking in DCS or other measures in RL. Just because you advertising paper say aim-120 can go around jamming dont mean that it dose it in RL or DCS. When flares were tested, Same outcome for Russians as Americans, testing own flares did not help the seeker in RL situation because the opponent was using other type of flares witch made the opponents flares better then expected. I would assume same pattern fallow other countermeasures.

Show me one example or prove that aim-120 can hit a target home on jam, it is EDs world and workaround, home on jam is like homing on targets that don’t exist. Only in DCS Aim-120 hit a target home on jam

What could you expect from GG, Jammers should help GGs AIM-120 to hit the target not the opposite. I dont know where you get all your intel regarding jammers . I bet its from advertising TV-shop brushers of F-16/F-18/F-15.

51PVO/100KIAP have sent reports as well for 13 years, dont make of your self some sort of hero when it’s obvious what you are:) All good let the Flanker break the TWS as the F-14 dose. Im just pointing out how funny it is to watch you talk depending who it effects MP community is hunting exploiters thats how far we are in to DCS BVR code! the competitive modes are exchanged finding who is exploiting a rolle or 32sec magic INS or pulling 30Gs with tanks, list is long, Great work with your reports

I dont see any solution from you! I see only bias talk that suits you! You are welcome!

ED agree now when it affects Nato fanboy toys the Same way. That is Bias approach and very low by ED as many other things I will not mention here. just a reminder, people dont fly Flankers because it has only been improving to more realism . But when same realism reach Nato toys F-15 and F-18 make 30G with tanks

I dont paint, I see the hypocrisy and pointing it out.

Funny, you were the one that wanted 15 sec warm up and was for it when your TWS was effected in F-15, Why do you want to remove it now? What has changed regarding this topic? Why is the 15 sec not good anymore? 51PVO/100KIAP were saying from the start that 15 sec was just implemented for balancing a bias approach! Some things are fine to balance until it dont suit you. Dont worry I will point out double standards. I know you love me for that:) YES, plz remove it so we can blink to the left and right make Nato fanboys cry . ´With that goes all your credibility regarding realism with bias approach Would like a reply from ED regarding this topic as well!

Totally agree Fox! Its sad that ED don’t understand that we fly in MP as matches and tournaments and all missiles that are used in DCS need to be to date around same time. You are braking the community more the you think by this BIAS approach. With that fallows costumers. Its funny if you dont remember Chiz when I told you that ED should have control over missile performance. Back then you told me its up to each developer. I replied by telling this will become a good borch and got band. Look at us now Plz take my concerns with some afterthought.

You cant test in same way against AI, I can support with tracks from MP.

I will show you the difference;) Can you explain what is going on here Chiz? This kind of things are not unusual but actually the opposite!

I would not blame ED for not making Su-27SM or anything Russian. American laws that stepped in around 2014 made it difficult, Im sure Russians have replied with thire own response to American sanctions as well. But that dose not mean that we should not give as much attention to all missiles that are used in DCS.

The difference should be there and no one is saying anything different, its just that ER-27 go for chaff, or for something unexplainable many of the times compared to Aim-120. Im totally fine if Aim-120 is at 70% and ER-27 at 30%. Chiz I know for a fact that ER-27 have became worse 3 years a go, ask anyone. Servers were using R-77 on flankers because people thought it was a bug. Then time went with no explanation and people accepted it while aim-120 was as effective. Then people have to prove that there is a bug for three years and then we have to wait for it to get fixed for two. We fly against one another in MP as tournaments and matches and would like weapons to be bug free first! I will show on track for you all the difference between how Er-27 eat chaff or what ever compare to aim-120 from 10KM.

I will show you what I mean, 70% is clinical test from no escape zone in MP.

I have data on more then 1000 missiles fired. Just sending a proximate. This data is public. i will send some tracks soon

Chiz If you want 51PVO/100KIAP can start supporting you with data from matches on missiles performance. Tracks and % per missile. Cant share those tracks in public.

If Aim-120B 60%, Aim-120C 80%, ER-27 30% in MP would be perfect. As it is now Aim-120 is around 60% while ER-27 15% in MP.

Max, you can fly what ever you like but I would like products that are in DCS to work as close as possible to RL. At the moment ER-27 Family have been bugged for over 3 years and need some attention. Let me assure you that Flanker is more realistic then F-16/F18/F-14 when it regards air to air.

Missiles need to work in MP and tested there Player vs Player!!! It is pointless to talk about numbers and data vs AI, as Datalink for Flankers only with AI! Blinking jammer to the left, Blinking jammer to the right, NATOfanboys start to cry, Now same people dont want it. What is realistic Chis? Or was the 15sec warm up just a balance thing so fanboys TWS could work? It is pointless to send track or wright reports to ED, have done it not once but for years as 51PVO/100KIAP with no results. This is a combats simulator A2A/A2G weapons should be priority to work, Not waiting for a bug to get fixed regarding missiles for over 3 years. Regarding all platforms and not only the ones that are flown the most, I pay for them all! My question is why ED dont make Su-27S? Even if Russian companies/organizations are sanctioned by the States you should be able to make the S model to go around the risk.

So funny to watch the double standards! Would be good if ED fix3ed bugs that are over 4 years old as well!! I acctully paid for that product to get supported!!!

LOL; Jamming BLINKING BIAS, NOW we should remove it remove 34 sec magic INS as well . A video to ED https://youtu.be/yRKfovi_KMY

15% is a fake? Show me data that its not in DCS. Thats the only thing I told you with data supported with 1000s of missiles fired. If you believe that ER-familly should have 15% hit rate then it fine by me:) Dont tell me who is fake because you just dont have the numbers in DCS or in RL. Not my intention to sound rude but after three years you start yelling...