Teknetinium

Sunday 9th Jan, 1800z - 36 vs TMC - https://www.twitch.tv/ke8ab Sunday 9th Jan, 1800z - Alamo vs Cobra Aggressors - https://www.twitch.tv/51breakshot

Saturday 8th Jan, 1800z - https://www.twitch.tv/ke8ab

Saturday 8th Jan, 1500z - https://multistre.am/51breakshot/d3liverator/layout4/

SATAC 2021 Match Streamers Saturday 8th Jan, 1500z - inSky vs VTAF - Breakshot - https://www.twitch.tv/51breakshot Saturday 8th Jan, 1500z - CNF vs 420th - Deliverator - https://www.twitch.tv/d3liverator Saturday 8th Jan, 1800z - GC vs 107th - Kebab - https://www.twitch.tv/ke8ab Sunday 9th Jan, 1800z - 36 vs TMC - https://www.twitch.tv/ke8ab Sunday 9th Jan, 1800z - Alamo vs Cobra Aggressors - Breakshot - https://www.twitch.tv/51breakshot

51PVO|KIAP100 Aircraft: MIG-21, Mig-19, Mig-15 Map: Syria, Persian Gulf, Caucasus

The point is that you fire sometimes at max Range for tactical reasons with a goal to kill!

i Fake as well? Disappointing since I dont see this as impossible. We have seen MIG-29 work on a drone and R-27T work on a F-15E.

Yes, in RL missiles have less probability to hit at max range, I dont underhand what the argument is. I just asked you if you used same analogy when building your educated opinion about AIM-9X/AIM-120 as R-27?

That's why I fly DCS I think you misunderstood me, Fire within DLZ at max range 30-60 is not the same as waiting to 10km.

I think you would do a lot not to get killed in A2A combat.

Great work so far, keep up the good work! Best wishes comrade! a3e9658d6f9ff519.mp4

Do you think with same analogy about AIM-9X in Syria as R-27 in Eritrea? Or could it be that we were dealing with untrained pilots using this at the time new weapons? If we will go that way, count how many AIM-120 it took to bring down one Serbian MIG-29A with no Jammers/CCM or SPO and build your analogy from there as well. Im not arguing with you and Im sure you have more intel then me but some of your comments dont hold ground as neutral. As you probably know In a fight 90% of the missiles are not fired to kill but to get a tactical advantage in order to kill.

We have decided to extend the timetable with a month or two in order to have a chance to stream all flown matches. Obviously we wish to keep the schedule as is but have concerns for all the competitors to have a chance to get streamed. I hope streaming all matches will compensate 2/3 of the frustrated squads that would like the event to continue with current timetable. We will get back to you shortly with new format for a timetable as well as times. We are really sorry for the in vain planning you had to do. Best regards!

Source? If we talk about what pilots told me or you, jammers would fry AIM-120 radar

I like the RWR in that picture you sent Chiz! Look in to Nato DCS RWR sensitivity and all this discussions about that aim-120 is bad will go away!

Timetable is up, check first posts.

ED could look inte RWR as well, that could improve aim-120 and the rest of the missiles. Lets face it, F-18/F16 has been overpowering for ages.

Trust me I know what Im doing in Flanker and made tests compering F-16, F-18, Su-27 before making statements.

Its F-16/F-18 RWR that is way to good with the pression it has, If-16/F-18 did not have so precis RWR where they put the AIM-120 in perfect 90 degree notch every time, you would see AIM-120 work as good as it is working on FLANKER.

Sign up is closed, we are working the the groups, schedule and missions.

The sign up is extended to 11th October.

The 51st PVO & 100th KIAP are sincerely grateful to all those who are supporting SATAC 2021! Eagle Dynamics, Magnitude 3, Razbam, Heatblur, Tacview, LotATC.

Good Work Comrades!

https://youtu.be/MvQ5ynbwfHM