Teknetinium

We have decided to extend the timetable with a month or two in order to have a chance to stream all flown matches. Obviously we wish to keep the schedule as is but have concerns for all the competitors to have a chance to get streamed. I hope streaming all matches will compensate 2/3 of the frustrated squads that would like the event to continue with current timetable. We will get back to you shortly with new format for a timetable as well as times. We are really sorry for the in vain planning you had to do. Best regards!

Source? If we talk about what pilots told me or you, jammers would fry AIM-120 radar

I like the RWR in that picture you sent Chiz! Look in to Nato DCS RWR sensitivity and all this discussions about that aim-120 is bad will go away!

Timetable is up, check first posts.

ED could look inte RWR as well, that could improve aim-120 and the rest of the missiles. Lets face it, F-18/F16 has been overpowering for ages.

Trust me I know what Im doing in Flanker and made tests compering F-16, F-18, Su-27 before making statements.

Its F-16/F-18 RWR that is way to good with the pression it has, If-16/F-18 did not have so precis RWR where they put the AIM-120 in perfect 90 degree notch every time, you would see AIM-120 work as good as it is working on FLANKER.

Sign up is closed, we are working the the groups, schedule and missions.

The sign up is extended to 11th October.

The 51st PVO & 100th KIAP are sincerely grateful to all those who are supporting SATAC 2021! Eagle Dynamics, Magnitude 3, Razbam, Heatblur, Tacview, LotATC.

Good Work Comrades!

https://youtu.be/MvQ5ynbwfHM

SATAC 21 - Final Stage | Week 13 SATAC 21 Final Stage.webm

SATAC website - https://51stkiap.com/satac SATAC 21 Timetable - https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1yn1_IjCkQXoCjogqVqkjU4Ap2scH2wg7W87Laq1FS2o/edit?usp=sharing SATAC 21 YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDkxM2SulbjJoEY8HVz_N7Q SATAC 21 Missions SATAC_2021_Missions_29.11.21.z SATAC 21 Missions - Final Stage SATAC_2021_LotATC_Example_Missions.zip

Best wishes with EF-2000, Im sure it will be done as well as the rest of your products. Congratulations on your new team up collaboration!

Thank you Bies, appreciated. Will do some more tests using data you provided.

Tacview-20210721-024213-DCS-test11.zip.acmiTacview-20210721-023301-DCS-test11.zip.acmiTacview-20210721-022815-DCS-test11.zip.acmi Su-27/33 has higher T/W then F-18C and should have around same as F-16C, Why do we see so big difference? All aircraft's are full fuel, no payload.

Great with transparency, ED will get to a conclusion much faster like that. Appreciate that the ED show the graph you worked on.

Chiz mentioned that AIM-9m has same value as R-73 in DCS, I would say that it is reasonable.

Why would R-73 be worse then 9M?

EOS bug seams to be sorted, appreciate the time putted in ED.

Same rules regarding jammers should apply 4gen aircrafts or we could go the road clamming some aircrafts jammers should be better or worse with no intel behind it.

GG has a point, there are worse things people are doing. I hope ED remove 15 sec warming up jammer on FC3 so we all can apply jammers with no hypocrisy.

Unfortunately the EOS bug is still present. I hope ED are on it. Has chaff resistance changed?