Shmick

No official word whether it'd be considered a showstopper for getting the final 2.0 out the door, as far as I know. But it's definitely something they're conscious of (though I can't seem to find the recent-ish poll where it was asked what kind of priority users'd place on that feature)

I think that'd be better than not showing servers, as then folk could see that there's a lot more going on and make their own choices about purchasing

I suspect he's worried about fragmentation of the relatively small pool of online players

I really think "outer pylons only" meant you aren't adding two more missiles, but replacing the existing SRMs...?

Unless I've missed something, at the moment it simply won't be possible because DCS requires a DX11-compatible graphics card. Hanging out for a dedicated server for 2.0, though :)

I spawned cold in MP the other night with an engine on fire, which I don't remember happening before unless actually spawning on top of someone. Suppose it might have just been a sync thing though...

Use the Module Manager within DCS World 1.5. The 9-box icon at the top. Also, grab 1.5 stable :-)

What if it were settable per-unit in the mission editor, e.g., "Takeoff from parking aligned"? It wouldn't be the same and I'd rather enter the cockpit fully cold, but just a thought :)

Well that's based on what you've been watching mate :-P That said, it'd cracked me up a few times getting a shampoo advert before a military vid!

Where? It isn't, it's that the pre-release is available to those who've purchased the module

It engages for me both in 1.5 and 2.0, though http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=148223 still applies

Touché ED, touché :-)

Ooooohhh... I like that :-)

Last I played on a server will kill messages turned on, they listed the wrong target / shooter anyway :-)

I was chatting to AussieGhost recently about this (when attempting a carrier landing in an F-15C :-P) and he made what I thought was the good point that on the F-15 and the Su-27 for example, the speedbrake's also going to exert a downward force, opposing your flaps to some degree. That'll mean that for an on-slope approach, if you're trying to maintain a given AoA, you'll need to have relatively higher speed to maintain it with the speedbrakes out.

I'm seeing the pilot rendered in both, just at a different angle because of where the shot was taken...?

No such problem on my end... Tried a repair?

See http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=148223

Sometimes when the beta's so good, you forget it's a beta :-P

TacView. TacView is what you could have done better :-) http://tacview.strasoftware.com/product/about/en/

Is it? The takeoff runway's gonna depend on wind direction and whatnot more than which direction you want to go after take-off, isn't it?

Hmmm... I'm not seeing this with the F-15C

"MD-SIM.COM (...)"

Top-right in the server list

It is - now with flashin'! RCtrl+RAlt+L I've seen this too, and think it's ATT hold or ALT hold related, but can't seem to reproduce right now. Autopilot engage / disengage does seem "surprisingly" jerky, even when it's temporary - pitch input with ALT hold on in particular.