RAZBAM_ELMO

+1 Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk

Yes locking in missile mode then switching to guns is how it's done. Technically guns is your last resort and because it's an interceptor it's not really mean to track radar locked targets in a dogfight. It's meant for bombers with rear gunners so they can use that standoff range but use the gun accurately. That's why if you're using locked beam or trying with the gyro it may not be as accurate. It's really the gunsight making an estimation rather than a calculated guess. Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk

I like the idea of heaters but the idea of having 15s and 27s and other modern craft is a bit dodgy. I would have rathered the migs and sabres or migs and tiger2s. I like the thought of bfm up close with heaters but I don't think having the modern planes in will do it justice as if it were gyro gunsights and early gen heaters. Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk

Set missile type selector to neutral if you have not already. Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk

Let's just wait to see what Rd9 actually is first. It may or may not be another Rd8 lineup or modern airframes. Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk

Unless the helo is moving away from you at a significant altitude or is stationary you really shouldn't be engaging it at all, call in to gci and let the friendly attack helos and CAS assets take care of it for you. Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk

It should. I tested it last night vs an f15. Did you make sure to set the target wingspan in the view box and not on the dial? Piper stabilize the target and track? Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk

If you're pulling 6gs i doubt you would have a valid gun solution to make a kill, at that point i would just go ahead and force lock the pipper straight ahead untill the target in within a 3g maneuver or snapshot if all else fails.

This is what we in HCG tried doing a while back in rd6 but alas not a lot of pilots understand why this is and know how to restrain themselves in a theatre while just rushing head in with no a b or c plan. I applaud you. Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk

Range scale does for me. Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk

Comrade you come close to objective. Is good enough vodka on the kernel da Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk

But then the reds would need the su33 am both tankers would be prime targets for high flying cap or loners looking for an easy meal. I like the idea of a commander and the AAR but tbh in an open dynamic capaign server unless there is some rules and regulations that you must abide by I don't see it working out very well in all likely hood. Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk

I'm just looking at it as if I were to play my mig. I'd want a sporting chance for the f5s Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk

Yes they fire off in pairs. The kh66 can fire one at a time. There is no way I believe unless you asymmetrically load the aircraft up on the ground but not recommended as flight performance will suffer. Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk

So far as I know the use of the ASO dispensers works fine, the SPS is IRL designed to be used against SAM threats more specifically patriot missile systems. As far as the gunsight and radar goes it is accurate if set up properly and all it really takes is memorizing your dive angles and speeds for the weapons you have to employ. Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk

Awesome dude Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk

Which systems? AFAIK the floodlights and fm are the only small things being worked on. The FM just had a bunch of minor tweaks in the high aoa scenarios Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk

Sure. I'd wanna test it out tho. Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk

Quigons right. The Case Blue version worked well and with fewer units this could address the issues in BF. It really evens out the playing field as the 15 and 86 are out of beta and there are next to no playable issues with either the F5 or the 21 that break the game or the balance. Only thing I could see needing to change that would be taking maybe the R3R away from the mig and just keeping the cruddy sar missiles now or just doing away with MRMs completely. I think that F5v21 IR only would be tits. Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk

They look really nice hegy but would resources and time not be better spend on your spring mod and stick grips. Not to mention warthog slew? I mean if someone were to buy a panel or a stick you could offer a free placard of choice for free as a bundle. Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk

Nice dude. Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk

I think for next round keeping it east vs west with mig21 and f5 taking the lead fighter roles, su25a and a10a taking the a2g role and mi8 and huey for helos would be really cool and a great challenge. No fancy tech. I would suggest tho that if we do do a f5/mig21 scenario that we take the SAR missiles out for us migs as then it would be a pure a2a ir fight. The only debate for that would be why not add the gazelle? Maybe the m version but not the L. Also the ai spawn aircraft would have to be mig21 and f5 as well. Spotter aircraft could remain hawk/ l39 I think and air defences could be bumped down to tungustas or aaa platforms Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk

Please let the next round be Korean era or f5 v 21 Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk

There's a radar button that will account for slow moving or slow speed targets. Forget which one atm but look it up in the manual. It might not be 100 percent but it may help. Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk

Yeah I'm talking about paper back or hard cover books cause it's always nice to sit away from technology every now and then. Thanks for the suggestions guys Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk