TomCatMucDe

not coming even close to what HB is doing. The Mirage is arcade to what we will have now.

If you think, these are the problems with the Mirage, you obviously dont fly it.

I wonder who’s job gonna be the most interesting with all this workload, the RIO or the Pilot. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

thanks!

If you want a place where you don’t see unhappy people about an unfinished low quality product, you can create a closed fanboy page on Facebook Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Haha Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Neither the A10C nor the Ka50 nor the Mig21 have unfinished central things like the Mirage with it’s radar and PCA. The comparison is therefore invalid. The Hawk is not not a DCS level module. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Of course people hate the mirage out of all the other DCS level modules for no reason according to you. Some people care about quality, you don’t. It’s fine. I personally do care. And I find it unacceptable that Zeus left the radar broken, the PCA as a place hold r and went to develop the Harrier. Result, 3 years after and the 2 key things of a fighter jet are not properly working and too arcade. Look at what’s being done at other devs and maybe your expectation would raise one day.

It’s not harsh when key things like radar abs armament deployment systems are placeholders or very buggy, other devs call it Alpha. Razbam has a lot to catch up compared to Belsimtek ED abs Heatblur. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

DCS: F-16C by EDSA & BST They didn’t say the F16 is a typo. It was about something else. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

They will be busy with the F18 for some time. Belsimtek will get back to the F4 and then maybe the F16. It’s gonna be some years before we have it, but with the F18 in our hands, we can’t complain. [emoji4] Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It was sarcastic of course. They are not stupid, it is not a typo. It not even news. And no need to write it is NOT in development in capital letters because the caption does NOT claim it is in development but simply COMING to DCS... Read carefully, it avoids you these uncomfortable situations. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Haha. You are amazing :) Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

sure. I have been using SRS for some time already. But if all modules come with a seamless integration, it would be more widely adopted.

Thanks a lot. I hope one day SRS becomes standard with DCS and supported by all high fidelity modules

they are probably already more complete than the Mirage now. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Do you have any personal stake in Razbam? Why is this over reaction as if somebody touched something precious and private to you? Yes the Mirage is in a bad shape 3 years after release. I bet the F14 and F18 are more complete than the Mirage now. It looks indeed in Alpha quality.

Will we see some 4gen Russian fighters? Is there a way to get the ok from th per Russian government? And why do they actually care?

great!!!!! :)

Are you saying we shouldnt give any value to promises and great “certainty” of devs? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Another failure to deliver on a promise... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You are right. People compare renders of the Tomcat and actual ingame cockpit photos of the Hornet. We need to have them both in hands to be able to judge. In my case I even need to see how they look in VR, that's what matters to me.

opps quoted their post hoping for a 2015 completion. Dig deeper and you will find the 2016. this is not to blame HB, but just to say that any date should not be taken very seriously. Even a 2018 release.

You mean like 2015, 2016 and 2017? Every year was announced to be the release year Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You see Cobra, we are simple people, we don’t need fancy staged videos. Throw any gameplay at us and our jaws will drop Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk