TomCatMucDe

Don’t hold your breath though :) Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

good to know that ED is upping their quality requirements from Razbam. Things are going in the right direction IMHO

Thanks Cobra! In 8 weeks it’ll be already towards end of Q4. Maybe very early 2018 is realistic, meaning right after my holidays in Brazil. In fact I’m looking forward more to your F14 than Brazilian beauties! Until then, keep these tasty renders and videos coming please! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

when I see this I regret I'm an oculus CV1 user... It wont give justice to your work.

Looking more real than real. I have an annoying question, is Q4 early access still on the table or we can expect a delay? [emoji4] Top job Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

We shouldnt believe people just because they said something. WIP of cockpit doesnt prove a thing. Even that cockpit wasnt worked on for long. There amateurs doing great cockpit and 3D models. It doest mean they can code. VAEO had obiously a strong marketing and communication but proved with a simple trainer that a Typhoon is a too big bite. On the DCS Typhoon itself, i dont believe we will see it at all. It is a front liner aircraft, it s the top aircraft for the German, UK and other European armies. It is insane to have a full fidelity model of it.

it was obvious that they were never able or gonna do it.

The message was to Prowler, not you. Since it's a free forum, I can give Razbam my feedback and express my concern and tell them as a customer I'm not happy, in a mature and respectful manner! Nobody needs to know/or cares what you will or won't do I didn't hear you saying this to the other who said that they will buy the Harrier Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hi Prowler, Bashing you would be a childish thing to do. You have had an honest and simple, no marketing bullshit communication with us. Praises for that. However, you have left the Mirage unfinished (not buggy, but unfinished) and moved to another product leaving many customers who paid for the Mirage hanging. It is a disappointment. I am glad that ED is cautious this time and will take time checking the quality of this product before putting it on sale. As for me, I won't purchase the Harrier, even if I want to, until I get what I have paid for in the Mirage. Thanks and best of luck with your work on DCS.

430 into the huey? Edit: I mixed you up with somebody else. Sorry for that. I deleted my post. As of the NS430 in the Huey, I don't know how realistic it is. If it could be supported, it's a welcome addition in my opinion. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Great to see you propping up your marketing material. Good sign that we are very close to have it!!! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I came to the forum to "complain" about the silence on the F14. Looking forward!

Fantastic work! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

By unrealistic I was actually meaning it is wrong. But I have to agree that "wrong" is a better description. Because people enjoy it, it does not become correct and realistic. I was flying almost only the Mirage in DCS but now I see that it's abandon it I don't fly it anymore and therefore I'm not flying DCS at all. I am waiting for some more serious modules like F18 F14 and F4 in the future. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Mirage 2000C Update this week? You are just trolling or you are truly unable to see the differences in Zeus post and the actual implementation. Or you truly fly the Mirage the way you describe it. You only shoot 530d, you never shoot anything else, no magics no guns, no AG. You would have obviously seen that it's very different from current implementation. no need to discuss further with you in afraid Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It doesn't operate exactly like the real thing? All the sequence is wrong. So it is NOT realistic Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What are you talking about? DCS or Mirage. You didn't answer the point. Forget about perfection of the Mirage. I am talking about its realism. Does the weapons deployment look realistic for you now that you know how the real thing works? The Hotas and PCA implementation is different from real. How can you consider it realistic? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I didn't quote the full post because it is contradictory. You just showed how different is the real system from the one simulated now, and you say it is realistic but not perfect? How can it be different and realistic and different the same time Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'm not near the computer now but you can search a post from Zeus himself around beginning of the year where he describes how the real systems works. You will see how different it is from now. Basically you will have to learn how deploy magics guns, how to engage NAV mode, ag mode, as mode ... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

of course it is not realistic! what's realistic about it if the the armament deployment sequence is totally different???

The advantge for MiG is that, in MP, you score 2 kills for one F4 downed:P

Did they state "not the majority of systems will be available" or "not all systems will be available". I think it's rather the second Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I start to wonder if you are really objective in your Defence of this third party dev. Is it only because you enjoy the Mirage ? The F5 has also a radar and it works well! The Mirage doesn't. This is NOT ED problem. The Viggen has a NAV system with drift and it works well. The Mirage doesn't. This is NOT ED problem. The Viggen and the F5 as a correct weapon deployment. The Mirage doesn't. This is not ED problem. The F5 has a correct CCM, yet simple by its design, the Mirage doesn't. This is NOT ED problem. Why do you intentionally want to blur the lines and say that these basic problems in the implementation and coding are because of the changing DCS platform and ED itself. Clearly they are not. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Then we are on the same page. What bothers me, is that I am in a bar, I pay for a drink, the tender pours it in front me, he stops when it's half full only and goes to fill other glasses of other customers who haven't even paid yet. It's unfair. That's my problem here. I paid from day one and I supported even with the pre alpha release. It was fair that they need to fill their treasury. I was against those who complain about unfinished stuff while Razbam was working on fixing and implementing new systems. Now it's not the case anymore. I see that the glass is half full and half empty, but we didn't pay half price (pre release had a 20% discount though but that's another story) Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk