petsild

I'm looking forward to the expansion thank you. Suitable voice will be (radio)

Exactly

Hi, voice-over is a great enhancement, it is possible to so remodel the basic mission?

Unfortunately, you misunderstood what I first wrote, I just wanted to write the benefits of G-sync technology at low fps. When during the decline at 30fps visually conjures 60fps. Yes, it is better to use 144Hz if the game allows such a high framerate. At the present time, but such hardware does not exist, mainly in the multiplayer and challenging missions the frames drop below 45 fps on a lot of good hw machine. Until then, I will recommend only the 60Hz setting.

These and similar visible defects spoils the good impression.

Stick to the recommendations user Goa, you will see a noticeable improvement.

A lot of users not only DCS are back to a stable smooth W7.

Another update but not for the Spitfire, how long do we have to still watch the sci-fi world?

A small detail but it makes a considerably better :D experience of flight, big thanks. I combine with my modifications, for improved readability air instrument speedometer. https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=189399&page=3

I did manage to get it working and assign the three views. - Natural Cargo View - Camera External Cargo - Indicator Cargo I'm going to train and once again thank you.

Yes I didn't use the Cargo View, thank you. You write that you have to the function assigned to the button. I can assign keyboard shortcut, but not the button, is there some sort of trick?

Hi, I need advise please, I still can't more move than is in the picture, thank you.

A very authentic :thumbup: finish, thank you for sharing your perfect work.

Much does how much do you have programs running in the background, other times DCS after you start running better and sometimes worse, nothing more. If you want to lift the performance of the graphics card you need to use MSI Afterburner, Evga Precision or Asus GPU Tweak, I'm sure there are more options.

This part of the FW does not change the voltage/ frequency or power limit, only adds support for DP 1.3 and 1.4 for 0.1% of the monitors. Therefore, it is not possible to achieve an increase in performance!

If you can keep over 145 fps you can leave your monitor at such a high frequency. I guess you didn't understand the principle of G-sync.

The best value will, that at which you are closest to the average fps. If it's not to guarantee high framerate 144Hz is a bad choice. Smart :) monitor G-sync offered the best efficiency in the 30-60 fps, everything above is working v-sync.

Friends, just do a simple experiment, where the error is stuttering manifest itself the most. Turn off g-sync/v-sync or fast-sync. Set lock framerate in the game to 60fps and leave the monitor Afterburner for the OSD value graph. The surprise is instead of 60fps you get 62fps which is the first fault. You will see clearly the fluctuations in frames -3 calmly +3 fps completely unreasonable. The problem occurred from the N44 alpha and unfortunately it is here to this day. In such an extreme is not an effective nor G-sync crutch. So unnatural acts only DCS world, no other game is as brutal fluctuations in the framerate. Lock fps: path: C:\Users\xxxx\Saved Games\DCS.openbeta\Config\autoexec.cfg edit and add a line... options.graphics.maxfps = 60 I use makeshift solution, where I can partially eliminate the stuttering, more precise management of locked fps, and I get much smoother looking in the cockpit. In the Nvidia Profile Inspector in the tab for the Digital Combat Simulator: Black Shark Frame Rate Limiter – 60fps Frame Rate Limiter Mode – Limiter V2

The profile is right, but no other AA method, even the Nvidia Profile Inspector is not supported.

I use the function of the TrackIR Z to zoom quite a long time. Still works the same as with the Mustang, or Kurfurst. You can demonstrate on a short video?

The current support AA is ineffective, I don't know how to SLI, but otherwise you can force the NV panel MFAA or pseudo FXAA.

Recently the module was promoted with Early Access to Realase, but the quality of the processing it at all does not correspond. Well I remember when Spitfitre came out, as the novelty did not suffer so many graphical defects, as the current version. Let me remind you that they are too visible and spoil all the joy. - During the open cockpit is present senseless reflection. - Sun has a weird size and color, not that it would dazzle. - The filter glass of the reticle against the sun is only for show. - The double reflection of the windscreen. - Too green windshield. - After two years of development, no option to own the cockpit. - It is not possible to use manually the directory of the Liveries for the adjustment of the cockpit from Update #6. - Even more errors that are not seen... A lot of enthusiasts prefer warbirds of WWII, devote all the resources on the Hornet is not fair. Thank you for understanding, written in a friendly concept.

Again the extreme defect, that should be addressed immediately by hotfix. Why so visible defects takes to fix such a long time?

Where is the natural effect of the sun? Size or coloration does not resemble the sun, but rather the full moon. The other modules are fine.

So ugly the sun is the fault module Spitfire, other aircraft are fine. Please admin move post to the correct threads, thank you.