Jump to content

Livers

Members
  • Posts

    348
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Livers

  1. This problem is back in the latest open beta. Pick any track above, all broken.
  2. I cheated, scanned the horizon and continually tried to lock. I should have scanned to the left first. Sill could not see the Abrams, or kill it. F7 view showed I was hitting it. Invulnerable?
  3. Installed successfully moments ago, MSI X470/2700X system. Maybe something else?
  4. Hear! Hear! I'm not looking for cheats - I want to know if this is winnable. If yes, how about a hint?
  5. Feedback thread? The one at the top with one post by @NineLine himself? I don't know where to begin detailing the problems with this campaign beyond the wild AI actions at times. My gripe here is only with the final mission. The fact that I and others are unable to generate any RESULT>0 score is all that needs saying at this point. After hours spent with zero progress suggests to me a major failure somewhere, either in our execution of the mission or some very obscure triggers to record mission progress that we are missing. What constitutes capture of a zone? Is a particular unit/group required to fulfill that? Must the zone be completely free of enemy units to fulfill that? Where is the border? I see a vague line in the briefing but how does that translate to the F10 map? How can I know if I've gained control of the entire area of Georgia, including ghost artillery and zombie helicopters? Would either of those block mission progression? Great emphasis is made in the briefing that that I make sure to load all aircraft in the Mission Planner and use them to their fullest. JFC, I'm a tactical commander and the mission is tankbusting. Having to do the loadouts myself is mind numbing. I'm a NATO guy, now I have to become an expert in SU-25T and and Mi-24 loadouts. Will my lack of knowledge block mission progress? Can I not win this without aircraft usage at all? I've cleared the entire battlefield several times, using only F-15s to swat flies. Result? ZERO. Now I'm ranting. @Callsign112, buy it if you haven't already, give it a go and provide the feedback you think will move it forward. I'm exhausted.
  6. The same problem as shown in the video. The Result of zero in the debrief indicates to me that no mission objectives were accomplished. I find that a bit hard to believe with units occupying all zones and not a single enemy to be seen. I would have liked to see more detail of the Messages log, maybe there is a hint there. Unwinnable IMO.
  7. I await patiently for that YouTuber to show his solution to Mission 11. I do admit to not trying it in recent months, as I am convinced it is unwinnable in CA's current state.
  8. I can assure you, that Single Player missions and this campaign are plagued with AI pathing issues. I see it on a daily basis. If you aren't, please share your secrets. I have given up reporting them until I see some/any progress from ED.
  9. Finally, it is fixed again. First click selects the target, the second the underlying unit.
  10. @NineLine rename the .trk to .miz doesn't work? TF-51 control.miz
  11. Yep, no problem with ground vehicles, just aircraft. Game Master CAN control them.
  12. As a tactical commander or JTAC, only when playing as a game master. Is this intended behavior? TF-51 control.trk
  13. Here's one - the Red T-80 kills 2 Abrams while the Abrams never see the killer. Assuming the track plays correctly. AI_test.trk
  14. Still seeing this also.They have amazing detection and aiming capabilities.
  15. Another test track: Reaper_test.trk
  16. Thanks for the fix, team.
  17. Can someone explain to me what "Expectation" means as a task?
  18. As an addendum BN, as a tactical commander, just jumping into and out of the units will get the countdown working.
  19. Units appear to be stuck in an aiming countdown loop... m270_test.trk
  20. Sure, slightly modified version of my original post: Reaper_test.trk
  21. Yeah, but they are missing, a lot.
  22. Good idea, but my example track included tactical commanders, so ...
  23. Thanks for verifying the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...