Bogey Jammer

Voice attack can do that. There are commands available for all gear handle movements and its lock. At first bind keyboard commands for them then program your voice attack profile to replicate them. About the breaking of the flaps and lights I'm not sure it is modeled though…

I had also the feeling that landings are much more harder to perform since 1.5.6. According to the comments and the video just above, it seems OK. But still, I wonder if the gear's suspensions are out of tune and stiff like rock. Even during take off, I pull the stick at the last moment because the MiG doesn't like AOA anymore and the main gear bounces violently along the roll axis.

Pfff, if I had a billion dollars, I would buy a real jet. …and give 20% to ED :P Now give me a billion :D

1) +1 :thumbup: 2) see my signature that may be what you are looking after. 3) ATC overhaul is said to be in the pipe but way after the 2.5 version release 4) with an animated 3D model please

Nevada, Caucasus or both ? I think that things are already getting some optimizations for the 2.5 version.

Don't worry my joke is a total failure anyway

I was just kidding ;)

Yes, the MiG-28

Roles are quite the same which would be the main issue for willing to get both, but fighting styles are very different. The Gazelle is more social (multicrew, needs to fight in packs) while the Ka-50 is more lone-wolf, Rambo style. FLIR and RWR in the Gazelle may also fill a gap. So I'd say I you like the Ka-50, the Gazelle would be satisfying too. Beside most of the basic aspects, everything else is different enough.

Or even better: a colored picture of the longitudinal shape of the weapon to recognize them at first glance without to have to popup their names with the mouse pointer.

Since the last updates of the FC3 cockpits, I noticed the presence of white color shades hard painted in the color map. The Su-27 is perhaps the most affected (for example, on the black circle of the main instruments). While it was acceptable for me in the first place, it is too evident in VR and it makes the cockpits look unnatural and cartoonish. I would recommend if possible, to remove the white shades from the textures, and replace them with true material shaders. :)

I'm impressed how fast the Win 8.1 proportion has been reduced so much in general. But why ?

I usually don't like trainers but… Where's my Alpha Jet ?

I think it's possible to at least recreate the tables based on measurements with the help of Tacview, but I'm currently too lazy to do it…

OH LA VACHE That's what I said yesterday when I tested my CV1 specimen. It is priceless to discover how years of simulation play on flat screen has been misleading about the aircrafts' cockpits. Switches are a lot tinier, frontal instruments are bigger and lower, leg funnels are shorter, some displays are a lot bigger, wings are also impressive, general cockpit design is looking actually very challenging. But the most amazing were the shapes totally unnoticed until now, the ones perfectly aligned with the line of sight, like the MiG-29's display's sun guard, or all the cables and rods around the MiG-21's ASP. Ka-50's cockpit is huge and Mi-8's is wonderful. The feeling of being in the cockpit highly compensates for the low resolution and high price. The external views however are not very improved except when contemplating aircrafts on the ground at human height.

Please don't underestimate me dude, I can't understand how you can consider people so low with so lame hypotheses. "the MBOT work here…" are you a fanboy to speak like this ? I've followed the thread until some time before the test version came out. Unfortunately I don't have the NTTR module, so I have not tested the thing at all, and barely followed the thread that was mainly about issues that were already solved in the development version. Indeed, I didn't get the detailed picture but if you want to play smartass, you'd better to make a nice presentation of DCE for everyone.

That is worrying me. So it is a fixed story dynamic campaign engine ? There is no flexibility for the user to create his own initial conditions ?

Of course but the point is to do the guesswork the most credible as possible. Problem is… many other features of the M-2000C were developed from guesswork, so your reasoning would eliminate the whole module ;)

BTW after watched that video above, and considering the relative straightforward bulky architecture of electronic applications of computing in the 80's, I'm wondering if the RWR rendering would just be pictograms giving Left/right information only instead of a perfectly aligned segments to the origin of the threat :music_whistling: Yet this Razbam's solution is ergonomically logical and convenient but giving the fact that the laser detectors don't have this luxury and must be satisfied with usually 4 sectors, perhaps this has to be reconsidered ? Who knows if the SAMIR's sensor are just giving global levels instead of a digital picture ? What can be the properties of the prisms related to the direction of the input light ?

I can deduce the answer from this : Thanks Jojo for pointing it out. By comparing the measured levels with the characteristic ones it would be possible to discriminate the nature of the sources. :) I think… The IR seeker of the modern missiles may use the same trick which explains why they are considered flare-proof. :book:

I don't know about the laser codes, but the KH-66 is more likely to be played into mission tailored around that element. The D2M can be in that case too BUT this would be a PvE scenario. Now the D2M can also be used during PvP close range combat. That's not the same psychological effect for the opponents based on the fact that the presence of this equipment is fictional. I already roughly said that earlier. However against FC3 aircraft it is indeed a worthless difference. But against hardcore realism enthusiasts embracing the original concept of DCS, it is unacceptable, multiplayer fairness or not. BTW the KH-66 is regularly thrown in the face as a counter example but nobody cares about the CCIP inexistent feature on the real ASP. That would be the typical case of convenient exploitation concept mentioned by Zaelu :megalol:

Not that dead, that's the wish of yours. I have a question : Does it have to detect flares ?

The possible issue is the advantage provided by this whatif feature, then the counter effect would be to ask for and allow more whatif equipments to everything else just like war thunder does. That is what I wanted to express in the first place :music_whistling:

I did not intent to be this aggressive with you and I'm sure I wasn't. You don't need to repeat what others already said 4 times either… About the sources, there is no one on the internet. I would need to buy books that have to be found used so no thanks I prefer to be the loser today :D

Ok I stop ;) And I'll use it whenever I can :P