Jump to content

myHelljumper

Members
  • Posts

    3170
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Everything posted by myHelljumper

  1. If you don't mind, could you tell me where this info comes from ? It's very interesting :).
  2. Are you in PIC (STT) lock ? IIRC the AA-gun pipper only shows in PIC, not PID, but in PID the range bars disappear.
  3. Same, I was able to detect a player F-14B at 45nm range.
  4. That is not the real function of the RDO button.
  5. Not the best place for this question, but I will answer it :). RDO is still not available. POL is available as it was before, but it's more useful now. It allow the pilot to see intercept information on the HUD without selecting a weapon or switching master arm to on.
  6. From what I understand, the triangle means magic+radar lock, it means that if you only have magic lock, you will still have the circle. The missing part here is if you have a radar lock and a magic lock without using the magic slave, you still have the the square+circle. I might be wrong :).
  7. Have you read the first post of this thread ?
  8. This change is nice, I will help to keep the SA even with the PID target :).
  9. 1: Triangle is not implemented yet, square + circle is magic and radar lock. 2: As said above, gun safety and the only way to select the AA gun is with the HOTAS command, should be called AA gun select 3: You have to turn on the systems and bind the correct HOTAS controls, the manual would be you friend here.
  10. PLEASE, stop the off topic.
  11. No you did not :). If it works it's a bug, it does not work IRL.
  12. Have you read the link that 33-DFTC provided you ? Those two lines in particular ? 5. Selecting an AG weapon will NOT set the HUD to AG ATTACK mode. Only the PCA will enter into AG mode. 6. To set the HUD, actually the entire aircraft systems, into AG ATTACK mode the pilot must click the PIP HOTAS switch forward (it is the same switch that sets the Special Modes when in AA mode).
  13. Read it on the french forum, that's some good news :).
  14. OOF, please, no more ! I can only get so erect
  15. That was confirmed yesterday on the discord :).
  16. They are called "camions a bombes" -> bomb truck :).
  17. The mirage 2000 can't mix any ordinance except the magics. It means that you can only have one type of weapon with the magics at any time ( you can't have bombs + 530D, rockets + bombs, 2 types of bombs... but you can have 530D + magics, 1 type of bomb + magics, rockets + magics...)
  18. Those loadouts are not possible IRL and should not work in the SIM. You can only mix magics and 530D or magics with 1 A/G ordinance (no bombs + 530 or rockets + bombs or 2 types of bombs). If it currently work it's a bug, and it should be fixed. And I don't agree with your analysis, to me, the efficiency of an A/G platform is not determined by the number of target you can destroy, but by the dedicated systems that the plane have to help the pilot deliver the weapons. IMO the viggen is a far superior ground attack plane, due to the A/G radar, the weapons (BK-90 OP as f*ck) the INS and general systems of the plane that allow it to be used in a high threat environment far easier than the Mirage. The only thing that the Mirage have better than the Viggen is the D2M (MWS), but if you fly in pair, you can reduce the probability of an undetected manpad launch. That's only my opinion regarding my experience using the two aircrafts :).
  19. OR You can read the first post and the manual.
  20. You need to use the special mode forward to get the AG weapon symbology.
  21. My opinion is that since this is present in the real aircraft and that it's already partially implemented they will finish the functionality. Also, quoting Zeus : We can see here VTH and PCN, the two systems that are concerned by the synthetic runway. It is not written if the synthetic runway is part of it, so I don't know for sure if it will be updated, but in my opinion it will :). -- Off-topic: I only asked you for a source and then said you were stating your opinion, not a fact (as you provided no source). I did not want to attack you personally, sorry if it felt that way.
  22. Okay then, that's your opinion.
  23. Hum, I would need a source on this, I don't remember it at all...
×
×
  • Create New...