OverStratos

Здравствуйте Только большие винты будет смоделирована с этой детальностью. Также, Это WIP. Однако, если кто-либо из вас думайте, что что-то не так, пожалуйста, дай мне знать.

And in top speed.:)

That´s because you have run into "maximal" stop(military power) which is around 100% RPM. In the real plane you need to actuate two levers to continue moving the throttle, the first is minimum afterburner and the second is full afterburner. (Forzash in russian) It syncs as suppossed to, also different engines have different idle speeds. In response to another post, the RPM gauge needle move a little more when both AB regimes are activated, because the engine actually overspeeds a little.

Amen.

Flaps actually retract at exactly 320km/h airspeed (in RL). It can be +/- 1 in some aircraft. Landing gear can´t be retracted when on the ground, because a small micro in the front gear leg won´t allow this to happen. Also, airbrakes should auto deploy at M = 0.72. Does anyone has tested this? I have DCS L-39 but right now I´m kind of bussy.:D

Up to now, only MiG-19P. Regarding the S I was thinking that it would be cool to have the best performing (and known) variant and a very powerful gunfighter, but those are only my thoughts. We have to see the possibility once the P is finished. I know that many of you like the PM, but you need to understand that with that variant you will be restricted to only 4 underperforming missiles. No AG, no guns, it´s a very limited aircraft.

Спасибо ALF7, Я имею в виду панель управления в правой консоли кабины. Кроме того, этот ASP-5 на вашем снимке - от МиГ-21Ф-13, У этого есть переключатели в прицеле.

Может ли кто-нибудь здесь получить хорошую картину ASP-5N панель управления?

Фиксированные неточности:

Я не считаю себя и "художником". Я просто знаю, как сделать 3d.:) Я аэрокосмический инженер, Годами работали с МиГ-21, 23 и 29, также L-39. Я также летал на некоторых из них. Вот почему я сказал, что вам нужно быть осторожным.:D

Dents? вмятины? Вмятины сделаны в текстура, если это то, что вы имеете в виду. Или ты шутишь?:smilewink:

Итак, вы без проблем летаете на трехмерной модели МиГ-17 с моделью полета МиГ-19? На мой взгляд, визуальные эффекты так же важны, как и ощущения.

Здравствуйте, Use Google Translator or if anyone is so kind to translate. What determines which one makes an aircraft? If anyone, having the knowledge, the possibility and the desire, makes a good simulation of the aicraft, isn´t that good enough for everybody? I´m not even taking into account that you don´t even know who´s working on the thing, but rushed opinions are always easy to throw. The purpose of posting work in progress pictures apart from showing the aircraft to you, is also that anyone with cause knowledge can spot deficiencies and let us know (like Chizh did) to fix them. Modelling an aicraft is hard, even more if every drawing (even factory ones) have errors, so you need to go and take measurements by yourself. Also, we are modelling an aircraft for a game, not for a movie, so many things have to be made simple. Leading edge correction. I think it´s good enough: Aircraft side view compared with a drawing: You can take all the defects you want, I´m not afraid of that. Further more, I love discussion about aircraft, even more if they are russian.

Well, there´re some differences, apart from the streamlined panel.

You have to dial distance, intercept angle and size (base) for ground targets. The sight use a basic ballistic method calcullation (speed and height). It does not take yaw, slide or angle of attack into the equation. (like its next iteration mounted on MiG-21F-13 and Su-7). The best altitude for rangefinder use against ground targets is 2500-2000 mts and range accurancy is around +/- 100m. Pilots preferred to use caged sight and manual methods then, because as every "first", the system was not too acurrate. The MiG-19P uses a second sight for ground attack. Engagement of air targets is fully automatic, you can almost say that the radar is a "track-while-scan" type, as it can lock a target while still showing others. It can detect bombers around 11km and fighters around 9km. Once the target enters the 4 km zone and within a 7º cone, it will be locked automatically. Around 1.2-1km the aim solution will be presented. Best firing distance is between 800-300mts. About F-100 vs MiG-19, the MiG-19P had less performance than the S variant, but still is better in acceleration and climb than the Super Sabre, losing only in top speed and range. I can´t talk right now about ITR or STR as I don´t remember. I will check later.

MiG-19P NR-30 cannons without muzzle brake.

Some arrangements, please don´t pay attention to the weird tint the before image have, I don´t know how it ended like that.:D Leading edge at the root. Wingtips.

Well, I already made the models for the old bombs and rockets, it´s just that with all the development train going on I still have not looked at that.

Because the reason all muzzle brakes are installed, recoil. In the MiG-19P you have 2 cannons instead of 3 like in the MiG-19S. I supposse the recoil was not that of an issue in the P.

We have to see if the ones present in DCS are good enough.

Well, at least the maximum accurancy available to humans.:D Anyhow, if you spot any other discrepancy, please warn me, be here or by PM. It helps to reach that maximum acurrancy goal.

Yes, that has been noticed and is almost fixed by now. Thanks for the walkaround, but I have an example here I can visit at any time.:)

Good morning/evening/night everybody, As you may know, we have been working to bring the Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-19 fighter aircraft to DCS World. We have been spending the time since the announcement doing the 3D work, manuals search, translation and data compilation from meetings with pilots and measurement of real aircraft. It is necessary to mention that hard data about this aircraft has been very difficult to find, but since then we have been able to get a very clear picture of aircraft operation, systems and performance. We have good documentation now, including some rare manuals, but if some of you have something that you think may be important, feel free to PM me. I would like to thank Foxbat155 and Vincent90 for the quite valuable help that they have provided. The MiG-19P: The MiG-19P, which entered service in 1956, was the Soviet Union first all-weather supersonic interceptor. It was designed to take care of bombers, strike and reconnaissance aircraft in any type of weather, including inside clouds and at night. As a development of the MiG-19S day fighter, it shares many parts and systems with it, but as a consequence of the weight increase because of the installation of an interception radar and the related avionics the performance was degraded, like top speed and rate of climb, among others. However, because of the incorporation of some modifications, the MiG-19P had a much better handling at his operational ceiling than the S variant. Is very interesting to know that among the fighter aircraft in service then, the MiG-19 showed very good performance characteristics, some of them better than the first variant of the MiG-21, the F-13. The subject of our work are the late series MiG-19Ps, with the following characteristics: - RP-5 Radar instead of early RP-1, with increased search and lock range. - Two NR-30 cannons instead of two NR-23. - Possibility to mount two R-3S air to air missiles. We have been taking very seriously also the performance of the available armament, here you can see an example of one of the graphs that show the launch zone of the R-3S missile: Here you have the available armament: The ORO-57K rocket pod was able to use the ARS-57, ARS-57M and OARS-57 rockets, known later as the S-5. We have been debating the probability to also make a MiG-19S, but nothing is concrete yet. All this pictures are work in progress and do not represent a final product. Also check: https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3142047&postcount=15

Oh my god! My wallet! ... it has started running away from me a few minutes ago. PS: Is that normal?