Enduro14

Nice input but sounds like some setup errors where done with the vive. Aka not forcing the pixel density. When all said and done im banking on the vive having more features in dcs compared to rift aka the full walk around experience and others. Only time will tell.

It's great their is feedback. YoYo I ask kindly that you take a look at the document that was just recently provided of actual engine Tems data. If it needs a FM adjustment Rgr that if it does not Rgr that. It's obviously on another forum which I'm sure everybody knows all about. Thank you for your time.

No no improvement on my end

True that and what i was trying to get at with first line was i usually speak from emotion before the brain kicks in sort of thing... Bad Army Habbit

Very cool thanks for sharing!

Well I'm not really a civilized person on certain matters. But this thread and the other that was closed is quite interesting. Didn't recently ED add a humidity factor to the game engine? Also if information is eventually provided or testing in all weather and weight drag config does prove our beautiful hog is not up to snuff can changes be made? Do realize and I'm not here to defend fellow service members but some fellas around here have the true data and see it in person everyday. That being said I fully understand certain things due to contract may prevent certain accuracies. Either way we should have a good discussion on this and take feedback not as criticism but as us as a community helping you maintain the highest levels of Allowed accuracy. Also I have seen 3rd party developers base their FM on all the geek numbers and more importantly actual pilot feedback. Food for thought but I'm sure I just stated the obvious. Hog is one of my favs and in a couple weeks will get to see her up close and personal so hope the best for her in the sim as well.

I think that is a good idea also even after the testing phase this being my first blue flag I'm still figuring it out. Like for instance can you drop what you carrying from a hover or is it a requirement to land?

Expect the unexpected. Helicopters make the perfect recon platform. Enough with balance baloney. I'm sure if the hells where able to laze in bombs people would go bananas about it too. Just wish instead of bombers we had artillery as that is a primary successful asset of Russia. Just wait next round you will have a gazelle with 4 air to air missles that will be fun and interesting. Instead of having a mindset of of oh man they can do this waaah waaah think of tactics to deny recon platforms into your area and execute.

REAPER, IRENE IRENE IRENE

Well maybe we should post a ticket about it and draw attention of testers and developers. Doesnt hurt to try right?

FACT! Well said as, they say competition brings the best out of people........

Here's something and yes I am one that asked for it for ka50 or mi8 as I think all rotor wing should have the ability. Will it make us a more hunted tgt yes and sorry the way I think and look at things is comparative to what I do for a day job. So realistically everybody with a radio could call in Airstrikes yes..... Understand the fairness police will kick in here hence why rotor wing or those trainer aircraft makes more sense I. The blue flag scenario. At least it does in my mind. Really dont know what the complaint is as one man used the feature last night and I believe no bombers where successful? Good job shooting them down. Sorry some had to take a break from Air Quake. I think it's a great feature brings about a more dynamic sandbox battlefield and isn't that the goal of Dcs World?

So I was told in ka50 if you fly at or slower than 27 kilometers per hour you will not be seen by radar... It's in the Lua files.

Just like real life nothing is more powerful than a radio. Quit whining and hunt we have to do the same for your gazelles all the time.

Crom wills it! Red side we need more GCI.

Bump can we get an answer to this as this is very interesting and important. THank you to be more clear im trying to get the total object count down as in 3d it really hammers the fps now when around cities and such.

I have noticed this exact same problem I thought I was hallucinating. Glad I'm not. Dood example is the a10c hot start on runway mission look towards the mountains and frame rate slaughter.

very nice look forward to this as its a very unique part of the world. This update is a hard one to wait for!

Awesome glad ill be here for this one woohoo! Red side!

Warhead mod!

I'm relatively new to the mig but from understanding the radars and airframe capabilities it seems to me it's functioning correctly. But it would be nice if Dev could do a quick check to make sure the decimals are in correct place just as a what if. Other than that this module is amazing and highly impressed with the work and detail!

Same problem here but in 3D I turn off 3D and run 2d I still maintain 60fps.

I'm not a real life Russian missle expert but would think ballistics wise it will become more un stable as it slows to sub sonic speeds. And since it requires a spin for stabilization I would see it definitely having an effect as its speed slows. Plus it sort of feels like environmentals have more effect in game now. We would need info from ED on exact modeling and changes.

I can tell you that the vikhrs are not nearly as accurate they once where past 8km.

What I love about red side is the fact it got me to learn the mi8 and mig21 had them all this time and have definitely missed out. Blue flag is a perfect environment to truly learn not very well known modules for me anyways. I never knew putting in Kub systems and Man pads could be so fun!