Guille H. Mono

Thank you very much!! :)

Do you have any source for this other than Silver_Dragon's words? I feel a lot of respect for him and his work keeping the Unofficial Roadmap, but would love to know if there is something official.

Very good question. My guess is they won't since they delivered a Persian Gulf Map without functional ships and nobody seems to care.

jejejej, me cabrea muchísimo. Es lo que peor llevo y de lo que más me quejo por aquí - estamos en DCS 2.5 con la misma selección de unidades AI que teníamos en Lock on - Y es una tendencia que no tiene pinta de cambiar pronto. ED reconoce que la mayoría volamos en SP y en mi opinión está fallando en crear un contexto apropiado para poder usar cada módulo. El caso más alarmante me parece el del Mapa del GOLFO Pérsico, ¡¡no trae un solo barco!! Dejo el tema por que es lo único que posteo últimamente. Os pongo aquí un enlace a otro MOD fundamental que sigue funcionando y suele acabar enterrado en la sección: ATGM Soldier Mod. https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=166007 Un saludo!

You may be interested in this Mod: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=166007

"Actually, DCS World go from 1942 (Spitfire MkIX) to 2009 (F-16CM block 50) aircrafts." Sadly this is not true, In this Digital Combat Simulation there are some modules that are left in a gap due to the absence of era related contents. i.e. I-16, wonderfull plane! What i'm suposed to do combat with? A 109K-4?In Normandy? Mig-15, bought it years ago, a delight to fly but I don't touch it anymore beacause it's just fighting Sabres in 70's Caucasus Map. I know the acces to technical info is what dictates what modules would be feasible and I can only wonder how difficult and costly a task like this would be. But lastly, We can see how 3rd partys are taking the step forward and delivering relevant context where we can enjoy their products. Mostly AI units. i.e. Heatblur adding Carrier and Intruders for F-14 or the Draken for the AJS-37. Razbam with the Tarawa and heavy tankers for the Harrier and M2K. Deka has been releasing some of their work from the Chinese Asset Pack. (note that all the examples I mentioned are free content) As for ED, they have been announcing AI content for a while. It unexpectedly appears in the News those weeks when there is no much to tell. Then, they are not heard of again or are sent to the lowest priority pool. The Persian Gulf Map is declared as finished and We do not know if these motionless ships spreaded arround the water are the only vessels We are getting. I guess this is how we got to DCS World 2.5.5 with basically the same AI units We had in LockOn. Wich was just an 80/90's era sim.

Atazar, echa un ojo aquí, no hay torres de vigilancia armadas pero seguro que encuentras cosas útiles. https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=242793 Un saludo!

Gracias Rudel_chw, por esta y todas en las que apareces siempre dispuesto a echar una mano. Conocía esta solución, era más la cuestión de haber perdido las pickups, MRAPs, posiciones de ametralladoras pesadas y esa estupenda torre de vigilancia que traía este Mod junto con el del Light AAA Pack son fundamentales para mi modo de entender DCS. Espero que ED espabile pronto con las unidades AI que lleva meses anunciando en las Newsletter porque estoy un poco harto de tener los mismos contenidos que tenía en LockoN después de haber comprado 12 módulos.

Creo que hablas de un objeto llamado NATO Tower y que pertenece al mod Ranger Pack 2.4.1, de Ranger79 Productions. A mi me dejó de funcionar en la 2.5.5 y perdí tantas misiones editadas que por poco mando esto a paseo.

I don't support how ED handles PR but I feel an honest effort from ED to do what they consider is best. And They are being as transparent as We've always been asking them to be. I am very happy with my personal experience with F18 EA.

It is a big disappointment for me. It is like ED does not care any more and the fact is that we have the same object pool since LockOn. Look for Mods? Yeah, right. I just have deleted more than a year of mission editting because I used mods that went useless with the last updates.

En el video haces todo lo que criticas en ED.

I understand what you say and appreciate your response. I just seem to have a very particular way of understanding the word free and this is not the topic, so I stop here. I don't think ED owe more that what I have for license I paid years ago in an ever changing enviorment but I will defend the right to express any concern or complaint in an appropriate manner.

Sorry, if YOU are getting things for free from DCS it is maybe because of customers that have been supporting their products from day 1. This may include paying for two or three Ka-50 licenses allready.

I'm not paying again for Ka-50 features. Used it alot in 1.5 and I havent been able to use it for more than an hour in 2.5. Even after reading Wags and Nineline's kind explanations I keep thinking the same.

And what about vessels? As much as I enjoy this map I will be very disapointed if we don't get fast attak boats and tankers.

I will be more than happy with a AI Prowler flying around. It has been a key piece in every naval operation for the last 50 years. There are a lot of things that can be done with scripts and triggers to simulate a jamming plataform. I know It could be very basic compared to the EW enviorment most of us have in mind, but still add a lot for the human experience. If you have been around since Lock-on, you would probably agree with me and welcome every addition made to the DCS enviorment.

Ofcourse, it is clear. I just wanted to add some of my personal experience since this jumped to my atention yesterday. Sorry for the typos and poor choice of words that may have make this look like a complain.

Same here. I have a mission (too many mods to upload,sorry) where there is a known static SAM (SA2) and an unkown SA11 battery ready for the ambush. I set the SA11 both Search Radar and traker to 'Unit emmision Off' from mission start and it still appears in SA page before it is commanded any status change via trigger. *EDIT: Some details, there are 1xE-2D AWACS, other Hornet flight with IRMAVS and a f14 FORCAP.

Thanks Revelation, I expressed some uninformed opinion. I have read about what you explain but kept it in the hear-say folder. cheers!

When F18C came out and people complained about the high price, developers explained that it was a modern complex carrier-borne aircraft. I was okay with that but now I have the feeling that they ask me to pay again for things that should be there and covered by my f18 purchase, like ATC and spawning.

+1, even in a limited EW enviorment would be a great addition.

Let me suggest a little Advanced WP Actions tweak: Delete the default "1-CAP" and create a new tasking. Also adjust other options like ROE, Reaction to Threat, and egagement ranges as you wish. Hope it works, I will try to reproduce this when I get home.

Talking about doing something else... Have you ever considered stop going after every person who express their fact based concerns about Razbam developements? I mean, if the thing is not to be repetitive.

The problem between Razbam and its customers is not solved by releasing new unfinished aircraft and push it in a hurry. Remember that "Cockpit textures will be added soon, after release"? Well, I think this is still Razbam's policy. Mig.19 was first in evaluation yes, but it failed to pass. I really hoped HB's push for complete releases would set and example for other third party developers. I guess that needed some customer self-respect.