microvax

Seems != know. Unwilling JTAC not cooperating with you, not RAZBAMs problem. Workarounds only create more workload overall and make existing problems seem less problematic. Neither of the two qualities is something we should want I guess. :D

Depends if pitbull or not.

Delecate requirement: Screenshots of tiny parts only. So we have to do hardcore level guesswork and research. :D Maybee also bi-weekly. Or once a month. :D inb4 3d model for a bolt for wheel mounting screenshot. :D single hydraulic line single light bulb ;P Do you notice the sarcasm ?

You provided a Solution to something which is the correct behaviour for a Simulator. If you are not an software specialist, how can you determine what is easier to implement.

It doesnt seem to have a that low refresh rate like the f14. But as you see, symbology is very non standard ! :D

I would guess DCS simply doesnt have the RADAR model atm. Zeus said before he would do what is possible after conversation with ED. But would be indeed be interesting why. :) Bc' I am only speculating.

That is simply not correct, the mission designer can set both JTAC laser code and mirage laser code. Its simply the mission designer who didnt do that. So its far from useless. And after all, getting a friendly A10c to laze is easier and actually more realistic in many scenarios. IRL 2000n do it for the 2000c iirc. Most realistic is you cant adjust it inflight, JTAC is able to do it. DCS is a simulator. I am fine with stuff like the d2m, which was an catalog option in terms of if you wannted to buy one back then, you could have it. I am remotely fine with having modifications like the quad magics. But something which is just not possible like gbu12 in flight lasercode change from a plane that doesnt even know its carrying LGBs, noo :D to much for me. But having an option in the kneeboard or something else to change it while on the ground, perfectly fine with me.

1.5 especially is not even using my 1080 up to 50% in many scenarios while putting out less then maximum FPS my panel supports, so well, I would say the DCS engine is to blame and not a module with high res textures and high poly count.

There were huge DPC problems in some combinations, but it got better from version to version. Take a look here if you want: https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/941579/geforce-1000-series/gtx-1080-high-dpc-latency-and-stuttering/ And well, DCS is unoptimized as it could be, I mean not getting 144fps or 100% GPU util is just bad. But 2.5 should solve that.

Yup, but if everybody complies with broken things there will not ever be the pressure for them to change things ! :)

I am not sure about the mirages FM, I dunno about low speed turnrate accuracy, but for DM I actually consider at least the Eagle too fragile. I mean hydraulics failing from a few rifle hits just happens way to often. Same as with missiles, someone has to start doing the right thing. :D And unless I discover, that the Mirage can take missile hits without severe and mostly fatal damage, I would say its really the other planes which need to be worked on, and honestly with the 2.5 damage model rework that would probably be an good Idea. And until F15 and Su27 do not take damage from runway craters I am not taking their DM serious anyways.... I mean even the Mig29 crashes from that. :D

I dunno how old the footage is, but that has to be horrible desync if its recent. I did sometestint already with a friend just for the RWR. Shot AIM120s at him. 4 Hits, 4 times pilot dead. It really depends where you get hit, but you are combat ineffective unless someone is so bold and goes in front of a plane which even if its falling to earth still has operational guns and fox2s. I mean you loose Radar EVERYTIME you get hit, RWR as well, additional to that you loose about 70% of the Engine performance if you get hit anywhere near engine parts. But as said, I will test. I think its really just bad memories in combination with terrible DCS multiplayer backbone, blaming the mirage DM for DCS issues. But hey, I just could be worlds unluckiest Mirage driver who knows.

Can I please have that DM ? Don't test against AI ! But know what, I am just going to do test tomorrow player vs player and publish the track. I am flying the mirage only since the last damage model iteration. And I never had that luck many of you describe. So I think it's mainly memories in combination with DCS multiplayer things that leads to that. But hey maybe I am wrong test will show.

Yep, it seems you fixed it ! :thumbup: Only tested preview, but that worked FLAWLESSLY ! :D Honestly you do not need to be shy of not beeing an entire development team. In the end you are more effective then an entire team. :D

Couldn't agree more ....

Now, that the thread is moved, is it automatically approved or something ? Or Do I have to do stunts untill some dev says something ? :DD

LNS isnt going for early access but for direct release as they said to minimize resources needed for post release reworks. So yeah happy to wait until its ready ! :D

Honestly I am happy waiting another 6 months instead of post release rework apocalypse.

Maybee because BK90 has a radar altimeter and that only works up to 500m ? But the graphs given should make range calcs from other altitudes doable. Kinda surprised expected 10km at 50m at mach 0.9. Thats the info I had so far, but well, not going to argue with the Manual, I guess. :D But I didnt see how to target it, so it could well be that the range in the graphs is for turn up to N degrees on final for release heading and the 10km is the range at which it will stall with given params. Would seem reasonable with 7.2km max range. Will be interesting to employ. 100m at 7.2 km is kinda dangerous at M0.9 for engaging any serious SAM systems. Question will probably be, how low you can release the thing. 20m at 4-5km seem way more attractive to me in that case. Question there is not really the range but, how low can you go, without getting into tunguska gun range. ;) Its indeed pretty complicated and HELL is it an complicated plane for early 1970s.

Cobra said soon, but check his last posts here for more detailed info: https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=2901554&postcount=2865 Definitely before f14. Viggen has been leaked by Steam pretty much. I do not think its a PR method. I think its a method to stop people from hyping the shit out of stuff and getting frustrated with it it not beeing released, while they think it _should_ be ready, because with their non software developer view they dont have a clue how ready something really is. I enjoy it, that way we dont have that many people DOS the usefull information flow here. :D

There is also a version on youtube without the terrible overlapping musix. That one is cool though: What is falu ? o.0

Glorious ! :thumbup:

Not officially branded as update but there was better info from some Devs then some official updates imho. And with not worth updating I meant, there is no point in putting a "we are coding" update after a "we are coding" update. :)

;D I didnt expect you to do it, but if you want ;DD

Thx :)) But technically I meant the entire book :D !