Jabbers_

As it was explained to me So basically, both are correct ;)

Strange man, never had a problem. Maybe check this Or tweet to Gleamapp for help. It's there thing, so not really sure why it wouldnt work.

I get exactly this as well... happens in various place for me, flicker is more of a flicker rather than solid like yours seems to act... There are certain places in the cockpit that cause it to happen more often.

Ok, I figured going with what was in the email would be better, glad I did and thanks for the clarification ;)

Understood, but there are 2 conflicting conventions on who this is by (obviously both) from a labelling standpoint. Both are right I guess, and to be more specific it would seem that Leatherneck is actually more proper, as anything by Leatherneck is also from Magnitude 3. So from my vantage point, and from the email I received and as stated above, I believe "from Leatherneck Simulations" is more accurate. But, clarification would be nice for future reference. Thanks guys...

Was the subject of the email, but its all really confusing. DCS Christen Eagle 2 by Leatherneck Simulations Review Inquiry Wish they would unify it. You go to the leatherneck website and see both as well.

The email review copy sent to me was quite clear in stating "by Leatherneck Simulations" Either way you all know who it is.

I thought so too, but in the email to me, it was quite clear that it was "by Leatherneck Simulations"

Thanks to Leatherneck for providing the modules for this giveaway! Good luck to those that enter! Giveaway Entry here: https://www.youtube.com/redirect?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgleam.io%2FkLSZo%2Fjabbers-dcs-world-christen-eagle-2-by-leatherneck-simulations-module-giveaway

Ya, where's the content, c'mon guys!

No, and the side effects of the mod in certain weather conditions drives me nuts, I stay away from mods like that especially since it breaks IC (i know there is a version that doesnt). I can wait for ED to add improvements, and with these improvements HB is done, I hope ED takes them and applies them to it's content as well.

After trying it a lot in VR I found that the shimmer was pretty much missing and I dont use MSAA. I asked HB about it and they said they spent a lot of time working on the textures and model to make sure it was optimized for VR.

You also need to remember the camera isnt the things shaking, the plane is, so your perspective to the horizon is unchanged. Thus, you shouldn't really get sick from it.

Thank you for this, very well stated!

Oh, crap I didnt realize it was at 50, will fix in the future thanks for pointing that out!

I use a Logitech g13, has a mouse joystick Yup works in VR HB has Voice Attack in mind, I believe this is why they have bindings for some of the individual actions I had to move my head because I have an ultrawide and recording some things in 16:9 I have to get creative, so the view is a bit different

In all fairness I may have moved my view back for those shots, I have an ultrawide and the record some things in 16:9 I have to get creative with the camera.

I was going to cover VR in this video but it started getting to long so I cut it. Ill do a separate video on that, or just post something on twitter, I need to do some more work in VR, I stayed away quite a bit for this because I needed to record so much non-VR footage As for LANTIRN, I believe it works, but cant show the RIO pit. I dont think Jester uses it yet, and the only way I would be able to show it is to repeat it in the pilot seat, but didnt have have the ability right now as it required a 2nd person and that person's time zone this week didnt match up.

Let's put it this way, I've seen people play DCS world competitively with a mouse and keyboard. Is it possible 100%. Would I do it, no, but thats me. I think you can do it just fine if you really wanted to.

It does, and with them adding the very specific Jester bindings you could ultimately do some really cool Voice Attack support as well.

either one, you can press a key binding, or you can look at the one you want and press the select binding.