Fisherman82

+1 definetly

Would really like it but cant open any mission, get some error message that something is outside of index or something like that. Feel free to try this one. Testmission.miz

Do they realise that they are killing of a bit of the interest for flying DCS by doing this? it would be fine by me if they would add liverys for aircraft that are needed to create realistic missions for the maps but they are not doing that. As far as I know there is only one S3 Tanker livery for example.

It would be good to have at option for this for the map in the Special options where module specific options are located.

+1 I have been hoping for this to be added to the Military Air Mod pack so it could be used as a AFAC at least.

There is no other at the moment on the map? Im not familiar with Germany yet so im asking because I have been wondering.

I just did these skins myself, the ejection seat texture is from the textures for the A10, thats why its not mapped in the textures for the F15C.

No on first question, no on second also it has never been communicated at least but only ED knows.

Downloaded your file, great file, just some info in case you are interested: Near Slagnäs in Sweden you have written "Training area?" twice. Those are car test tracks, if you look around Arjeplog a bit more north you will also find many more.

Anyone here that still got this on v72?

I dont know what you are after either, but there is a script called Simple Statics that you can use to activate and deactivate statics since this is not possible completely in the mission editor yet.

Its not my first Early Access DCS module, I I know perfectly fine what it is. There is no lesson about that to be learned here about that. This base was perfectly fine earlier in Early Access, instead of improving it they decided to change into a fictional layout that makes it look nothing like the real thing and makes it possible to use it totally different than the real thing. Early Access is for adding features and improve things so the product reaches the end goal that was advertised. Not a period to decide if it should be a realistic or fictional map. They never advertised that this or any other base should be fictional to this extent. With this logic they may very well add extra runways on other bases or extra fictional bases in the middle of the forrest to make a better setup for multiplayer airbattles with many aircraft for example. This base should have limitations regarding parking and taxing and the side runways should be narrow to land on because that is how a BAS 90 base is in real life. And now they have announced it complete both here and in the changlog so Early Access for this base is over. Well you know the ground textures are what I want to remove so that wont help me at all.

@Marina Will you be accepting refunds for this map now that you have chosen to deviate from the path of realism and instead switched to adding fictional stuff to enhance gameplay? I cant think of any other similar feature being added to any other DCS map like this so this was not something that you expect when you buy a DCS map. Any buyer should be entitled to a refund if desired since the map is no longer up to expected DCS standard.

Oh my god they dont intend to remove the big apron at Jokkmokk. Thats a showstopper for using that base for me sadly. The base is not intact anymore, they created a Nellis AFB in the middle of the Swedish forrest, obviously no clue what a Bas 90 base is irl. They could have done this and the widening of the side runways way better, they could have done it with grass/snow textures instead so its not a total monstrosity for people who expected a realistic representation of the base. This marks a shift in striving for realism, they are pulling fantasy stuff out of a hat and adding it to the map now.

I to want to know if the big Apron at Jokkmokk will be removed. And the short runways are way to wide. Its horrible, I dont understand why they decided to mess up a base they already had done quite ok.