twistking

Is this bug fixed now? The patch notes don't have anything on the F-5, but i'm hoping for a stealth fix. Did anybody check already?

Can someone else confirm that disabling ASW in OTT does not in fact disable ASW in DCS?

Are the current external textures confirmed to be WIP? I mean i surely hope so, as they clearly look worse than other modules while also not offering a lot of variety.

Wouldn't the YAK-52 fulfill that role? Shouldn't we demand the Yak to be finished before wishing for more GA or non-tactical AC. I absolutely understand the appeal of offering these types of AC in DCS, but i think the YAK could deliver that well enough, if it would get finished...

a very crude solution to a real problem. i think ED should find a more elegant solution than forcing players to place "invisible" RWR over non-functional map objects: there should be no combat-relevant non-functional map-objects to begin with...

*bump*

+1

I would also like to see other (civilian) POIs marked, not just tactical/strategical sites. Ideally those markings could be toggled in ME to prevent clutter.

that's cool! wonder how i could have missed that.

Wait...i can create a flightplan on the F10 map and it will show up in the jets (F-16 f.e.) avionics as waypoints???

judging only from videos, i also feel that the greens come out a bit too strong. related to that i found the normal maps a bit too strong where grass meets dirt. the strong normals make it look as if the mud areas were stenciled out from the grass areas. again... this is only from watching on youtube, which is not ideal for judging subtle texture details... but i think the map would look better with a slightly (!) desaturated and slightly (!) flatter (normals) look. ps: in general this seems to be a very nice looking map though!