sobek

You'd have a point if they hadn't explicitly stated in the changelog that DLC campaigns trigger the IC for this build. You are angry, we get it, but in this case, you asked for it when you installed the update.

6 posts up from yours, all you need to do is read it. It is not unreasonable for things to go wrong in a beta build.

So you have experience with a system that you've never used? That's interesting... According to c0ff himself the system will accept whatever modifications the server owner configures it to.

I want whatever you're smoking. Multiplayer. New integrity check system* Multiplayer. New extrapolation algorithm Multiplayer. Added an input adjustment possibility These are all *huge* improvements.

Prevent cheating.

You can already command ground vehicles. Not at steel beasts level, but it's slowly progressing.

The swashplate? I think that's animated, is it not?

You are aware that that is an enormous performance hog for very little eye candy?

Most likely because they use graphics engines out of the box that are built by teams that have 10x or more the budget that the entirety of ED have to make due with for the entire package.

If they manage to pull off procedural terrain and textures by then, then that could give them lots of leeway with regard to filesize.

Define playable. Never made the trip to LA?

Yup, and the Spectre as well. I suppose however that they didn't see enough market potential for those modules (or there were other key issues that prohibited game market release). I doubt they'd make an F-16 and not try *very* hard to make that accessible to the civil market as well.

Also says in that very thread: Probably it is just something that they don't want to commit to, at least at this time. And they have historically been very dismissive of ventures where they would have to relinquish even some of their creative control of core assets. Which is their prerogative.

Wouldn't that mean essentially twice the disk footprint?

Which is pretty moot for DCS though.

How much would you have to prime for the fuel to strip the cylinders of their oil coat? 10 minutes? Fuel in the oil system is not a real problem. Once the oil reaches operating temperatures, the fuel evaporates from the oil system. Same as when the oil is diluted prior to an expected cold start.

I think this is just an incident where visual clues are prone to misinterpretation because AoA is too hard to gauge. Does anybody know if the animation arguments of both swashplates can be exported? That would yield a definitive answer.

2 things: First, as Ise has alluded, in unpowered conditions, the rotor system has to switch rotors for yaw input (or else the yaw behaviour would reverse for the pilot), so when watching the helo on the ground unpowered, it is correct if the reaction is reversed. Second, how do you measure blade AoA? Are you aware that coning/flapping has a big impact on the individual blade AoA? I'm afraid that visual perceptions might be misleading in this case.

And what was the problem? You should add a solution, else this thread serves no purpose to future readers.

Check if any other controller has the prop lever bound to it and remove that assignment.

No amount of referring to handbooks can change the truth, sorry buddy. From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indicated_airspeed furthermore and finally Now please, show me a real handbook that condradicts this. Just saying "You're wrong because handbook" doesn't cut it.

That's sort of my point. Yes, but stall always occurs at same IAS regardless of altitude.

Das Credo des Ingenieurs, sorgt immer wieder für regen Gesprächsstoff mit der Geschäftsleitung. :doh:

Wie oft kommt das vor, dass sich im Internet mal einer entschuldigt? Lasst die Mistgabeln doch mal stecken...

That's my guess also, it made me cringe that you stayed at full power while so slow, usually that doesn't bode well. :)