sobek

Have you checked whether the instant action mission has a different realism setting than the cold start mission?

The problem with that is it can be quite hard for a layman to tune a noise filter, and the noise can be really quite different. This topic is a can of worms. In all honesty, this should be the hardware suppliers responsibility.

Hey, i think it would be nice if the module manager had an option to check several modules and download/install them at once instead of having to do it for each one separately (which is kind of a waste of time). Optionally it would be nice if it could be told to install all modules that are linked with my account but not yet installed.

More like undying.

Not sure if that is waht you are getting at, but AFAIK, all physical calculations for DCS run at a fixed (or at least minimum) framerate much higher than the framerate of the graphics engine to ensure that errors due to temporal resolution remain constant and deterministic.

Seh ich nicht so, es gibt einige Services, die in den letzten Jahren eine Möglichkeit für Sofortüberweisung eingerichtet haben. Bei Blizzard ist das z.B. möglich. Ist halt auch eine Kosten/Nutzen-Frage

Looks a bit like the hairdo of Tintin.

All caps statements, speeding up development since... oh wait :P;)

They are.

Press Windows key, then type 'cmd'. Now you have to type the following (note that this is an example of how it looks like in my case, you need to adapt the path depending on where your install is): "c:\Games\Eagle Dynamics\DCS World\bin\dcs_updater.exe" update 1.2 That should do it.

Die haben bis jetzt nicht auf dem "Consumer"-Markt operiert. Ich bezweifle stark, dass sich das dadurch ändert.

I'd venture to say if you spend a lot of time looking at the gui of a media player, then you're using it wrong. :)

Never tried it, too happy with VLC...

Nice catch...

Yeah, why don't we go back to writing everything in Assembler? 512k is enough for every instruction set, right? :) Ah, the sweet irony. :D Edit: Not that i'm actually opposed to reducing bloat of any kind, just so there's no misunderstandings. ;)

Why can't they? It's much more probable that the shadow of a house will entirely fit onto a plane surface part as compared to the shadow of a mountain. Given that the surface area is much bigger, it most certainly won't be flat, making computation a lot more complicated. Have any of you tried if terrain shadowing is on if you set shadows to non-flat?

VLC player, very lightweight, cross platform, open source, plays any codec i throw at it, never had a problem.

Yes i meant too low viscosity, sorry. At operating temperatures, you don't get nominal pressure at idle RPM. As long as you're not below minimum pressure at idle, evaporation is working.

Have you ever suffered from too high oil viscosity when the oil has warmed up after diluting? Basically the same plus working weapon systems and centerline fuel tank. On a sidenote, it's not nice to hijack someones thread like that. ;)

Unless the off the shelf engines don't cater to your product.

If you change the color of the vehicles, they'll stand out even less, unless you also adapt the TGP implementation, which i currently doubt is possible via .lua.

I seriously doubt that's in the budget.

[OT] If we apply that logic, then MP has much more growth potential. :D There may be a generation of people out there that learned to enjoy their sims offline and they may still be the majority, that doesn't mean that that can not or will no change in the future. If i had the time right now, i'd rather play with dedicated humans than with AI. [/OT]

New users already get 2 planes for free... ;)

Posts of the type "Can't you guys see it's broken? You better damn fix it" or "They way you did it sucks, you can do better!" usually don't generate a lot of attention with the devs. If you want to contribute, write posts of the type "Feature x has problem y, when actually it should work like z. You can reproduce it if you follow steps a,b and c. See the attached screenshot and track for illustration." Or on the topic of wishlists: "Feature x works right now but if we also had y, it would be a lot more useful to players". Telling a dev he needs to invest some "love" into a feature really isn't all that much to go on. He probably knows himself that it needs work. What he possibly doesn't know about is a cool feature that you saw somewhere else or thought about that would enhance capability. Oh and rewriting the netcode is *not* a small wish.