ustio

I mean I dont agree with the direction aswell as this will gamified DCS even more. but if we take a step back and take a look from ED position, what any other aircraft can they make that can bring them a lot of income? chizh said making Russian aircraft are Risky at the moment with whats happening. and 3rd gen cold war aircraft, the majority of popullar ones are already taken. but with that being said tho, I do hope that ED make earlier F-16, F-18, F-15 variant(as long as they finish the current one) as a paid upgrade. or the very least allowed other 3rd party dev to make other variant like F-16A. if a new player just got into DCS, then he will probably purchase the modern F-16C instead of the A. so i don't think if other dev make other variant it will compete

I dont disagree, but from business stand point, this would sell less if they marketed it as "lower than full fidelity"

guess moving forward DCS will be more oriented towards a Game rather than a simulator than before whether we like it or not.

So my take away from this thread is, the quality of ED upcoming module will decline in term of realism whether ED like to admit it or not. And yeah, nothing is gonna convice me then.

Regardless if this is true or not, having a dev claim something like having his access revoked from his own modules is a clear indication that thing are not going well. Doubt he would said anything bad if things are getting better. Which is why I would like to ED to give an update

the HQ-7 has an option for player control for its launcher so why not SA-11 aswell ?

I mean to be fair, Since that DCS players don't mind the early access business model, then I don't think we don't mind if the the Nike use the same guidance as SA-2 as long as it has some propper FM, G-limit and booster thrust and time Even SA-2 guidance isn't correctly modelled, like making the the missile to dive into the ground.

No 2D

No what im saying, because F-4 has a darker canopy than other aircraft, i thought that was the reason why spotting in that aircraft is difficult. But it turns out that was not the case. Even when there are nothing in the way, im having a hard time seeing a contact. So i assume your FPS has something to do with the rendering

I have a theory but i cant prove it yet. it seems if your PC is struggling with performance, the spotting become worse Currently playing with I5-10400, RTX 3070, 32GB RAM with an app the constanly clears cache. I can't spot anything while flying on Enigma while flying F-4, F-1 even when i jettison the canopy since they run heavy on PC. however, when im flying F-5, Mig-21, contact are way easy to spot even when im 20 miles out.

Does ED, plan to make any more statement at all now that it's been proven that ED haven't paid/ paid them late of two 3rd party developer to regain costumer trust? Cause i surely not planing to buy any more module if the module could potentially left unsupported.

do you need to wait for 2/4 seconds if jester acquired lock in Boresight?

When you mean lock by Cage/Boreaight, you mean locking it with jester context in Cage/Boresight after getting positive return right?

Yeah try flood mode. Go to boresight, wait until the eadar went from vertical line to single contact then fire

From my experience using the E and F(MP that is) using flood mode with NOSE aspect has a better chance that the missile would guide compare to CAA and Jester lock. I Never use CAA and jester lock again.

the BUK has its own Tracking radar hence why it's called a TELAR. recent conflict show the TELAR operating independently. in multiplayer and with how the Fog of War system work in DCS, placing BUK for ambush and do shoot and scoot without relying on the Search radar vehicle would open up a new gameplay. yep. been doing that in MP server the thing is, you can't have it's radar deploy while turning it off like when you drive it

I just hope a peaceful resolution. I'm not an expert in law, but I just don't see how realitically ED can take Razbam to court. And even if they win the court, I don't see how ED can realistically obtain the source code if RB just went nuclear. Like the Owner is in Ecuador, Radar dev is in France, with other dev around the world Nobody win if this is taken to court

unlikely since UB doesn't have a radar

They can operate independent from command post and radar. So why not give the ability to drive it

Ingame they are almost identical. The P has a slight advantage over the J on the aspect angle (120° vs 103°). Personally it never bothers me since i never fire close to firing envelope always way within.

Does the E still retain the bridle hook?

Performance improve significantly. But still experiencing some stutter although not as bad as before. Overall great patch

I'm not using my radar and the FPS would sometimes drop below 10 in Enigma. other airframes FPS are fines. is other optimization plan other than the radar ?

Yes please. Not being unappriciated of your work. But how currently unpotimzed DCS is. Would be great if you can have an option to turn it off. Specially in large complex mission and multiplayer

currently ingame, you can uncage the seeker for the AIM-9B by pressing the uncage button enabling you to take lead and off bore shot. this is however is incorrect since uncaging was introduce in AIM-9E. And I believe this problem is specific to F-5 airframe in game here is the track file and reference below 9Buncage.trk