ustio
-
Posts
281 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by ustio
-
Do we know if we are going to get other essex class carrier with angled deck for the F-8?
-
btw how long is the flight deck are compare to Nimitz?
-
yeah Im gonna bet that there will be some easter egg on the Forrestal release video
-
well we do know that one of their Dev from Truegrit was an F-4F pilot
-
just wondering. Is the navy phantom with its draggy Gunpods still a better dogfighter compare to the E because of the CG placement? I assume because of the gun is place at the nose would make it less maneuverable ?
-
well HB did say that one of the reason why Forrestal was delayed was because they want the carriers to be compatible for their future module. If its not the F-4 with their bridle then idk what. Its definitely not their A-6 because they use launch bar
-
The best middle ground is to have atleast the Plane Director, the Shooter and a plat cam while leaving the rest of it out. Assuming ED doesn't allowed HB for a full animated deck. I own the supercarrier. And i ended up being in a lose lose situation because everytime we do a carrier ops mission with myfriends. we either have to - have 2 carriers SC and non SC - or stick with the stennis. And yes Stennis does not have a lot of slot like the SC.
-
I remember BN saying that a while ago. I thought things have change after this interview. But it seems that it still where it is
-
might have to take back what i said. it seems BN are saying that ED are not making a Phantom
-
It would be a bad move if ED announce a 3rd party module before the 3rd party dev announce it. Especially when its a highly anticipated module like this. Besides im not sure if ED are willing to give a popullar aircraft that will give them big bucks
-
sorry to bring old topic but this makes me curious. Can the Lantirn without PTID and CDNU update slave to a waypoint from the INS when you press QWEP +\- IRL or is it just one of those compromise that you have to make because you cant make the PTID
-
Idk how FIOA submission work. But i wonder if we can have another submission with everything readacted except for the PTID and sparrowhawk so we can atleast have the B(U)
-
well IMO they should at least have the Plane Director and the shooter for those who doesn't own SC. or perhaps plat cam access as well while leaving the rest of it out
-
Okay both station has control right, and you are probably going to fly it for combat in online since you are kibda limited if you seat in the back for combat. So i was wondering if its a good idea if the CPG is the host station and leave the starting procedure to AI
-
more importantly, does the pylon have any drag at all?
-
Ok so the ATIS says arriving runway is 21L, However during and overhead break my wingman is on left echelon, when i kiss him off he breaks to the right nearly collided with and join right downwind and then land at 21R
-
wasn't there was a GIF couple years ago regarding animated deck for the Forrestal? I guess ED wont let them do it since that will effect SC sales
-
PSA: F-14 Performance/FM Development Status + Guided Discussion
ustio replied to IronMike's topic in DCS: F-14A & B
am i reading it wrong or is the ITR speed is lower than the STR speed? -
yeah I had this problem aswell. I crash into the water and DCS would just freeze
-
an alternative way to hide the stick is as soon as the missions start before the spacebar prompt command shows up. but its one time only
-
Theres your answer. Someone try to get the documentation, the US navy approves it, but then the US DOD redacted it
-
option to remove external fuel tank pylons from under intakes?
ustio replied to Strikeeagle345's topic in DCS: F-14A & B
Im going to guess that the pylon is probably part of the F-14 main model instead of a seperate model. So making it seperate would require a new model. I wish they are seperate as well. Its a tiny thing that makes the Zone 5 campaign more immersice -
Yep it happen randomly but most of the time you wake up when you are at the end of the cat shot. Now if I have to guess. There is an animation bug where during launch, the shuttle would sometimes compress the nosewheel strut in an unrealistic way. See here at 1:14-1:18 So when that happen, the game would recognize it as an instant negative G acceleration Now compare it with this at 0:45
-
Please HB pretty pleaseeeeeeee
-
I feel there is something missing in WW2 DCS when you can't control a bomber. However I understand that it would take a lot of effort and resource to make a full fidelity. so having the current AI to be flyable as an FC3 included in the WW2 asset pack seems like a fair middle ground. what do you think?
